Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 319–319 | Cite as

Response to Dr. Frederick Adam Zeiler

  • V. Petkus
  • A. Preiksaitis
  • S. Rocka
  • A. Ragauskas
Letter to the Editor
  • 186 Downloads

Dear Editor,

We are very thankful to Dr. Frederick Adam Zeiler for his comments and interest in our article (Petkus V, Preiksaitis A, Krakauskaite S, Bartusis L, Chomskis R, Hamarat Y, et al. Non-invasive Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Assessment Using the Volumetric Reactivity Index: Prospective Study. Neurocrit Care. 2018 June 27; Epub Ahead of Print).

We fully agree that the model of association between VRx and PRx is generally nonlinear [1]. On the other hand, we are using arterial blood pressure (ABP), intracranial blood volume, and intracranial pressure (ICP) slow waves for real-time monitoring of VRx(t) and PRx(t). Amplitudes of all slow waves are much smaller comparing with an interval of mean ABP and mean ICP changes observed during severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients’ treatment in neurosurgical intensive care units. Slow waves are almost always observed in a linear part of mean ICP versus mean intracranial volume curve.

We appreciate the proposal of Dr. Frederick Adam Zeiler to use more sophisticated statistical analysis in order to evaluate the association between VRx and PRx [1]. We intend to do that and to publish more extended analysis results from our prospectively collected data base of VRx and PRx clinical data.

We do not believe that VRx will replace PRx in the near future. Our intent is to apply VRx in clinical fields where invasive PRx monitoring technology is not applicable [2, 3].

We appreciate the excellent idea to validate non-invasive VRx on the Lassen curve [4]. We see the lower limit of cerebrovascular autoregulation according to the Lassen curve in our clinical studies of VRx(t) monitoring data during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and during intensive care of severe TBI patients. We intend to publish an additional article on this aspect of our prospective VRx monitoring studies.

References

  1. 1.
    Zeiler FA. A promising new non-invasive measure of cerebrovascular reactivity—not yet cerebral autoregulation. Neurocrit Care. 2018; Epub Ahead of Print.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumpaitiene B, Svagzdiene M, Sirvinskas E, Adomaitiene V, Petkus V, Zakelis R, et al. Cerebrovascular autoregulation impairments during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass are related to postoperative cognitive deterioration: prospective observational study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.23736/s0375-9393.18.12358-3 (Ahead of Print).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ziginskiene E, Petkus V, Chomskis R, Kuzminskis V, Nedzelskiene I, Grazulis S, et al. Noninvasive cerebrovascular autoregulation monitoring in hemodialysis patients: a pilot study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2017;53(Supplement):7–13.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lassen NA. Cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in man. Physiol Rev. 1959;39:183–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Telematics Science InstituteKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Neurology, Academy of MedicineLithuanian University of Health SciencesKaunasLithuania
  3. 3.Clinic of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of MedicineVilnius UniversityVilniusLithuania
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryRepublic Vilnius University HospitalVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations