Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 157–170 | Cite as

Intensive Care Unit Admission Patterns for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the USA

  • Robert H. BonowEmail author
  • Alex Quistberg
  • Frederick P. Rivara
  • Monica S. Vavilala
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) are frequently admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), but routine ICU use may be unnecessary. It is not clear to what extent this practice varies between hospitals.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank. Patients with at least one TBI ICD-9-CM diagnosis code, a head abbreviated injury score (AIS) ≤ 4, and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) ≥ 13 were included; individuals with only a concussion and those with a non-head AIS > 2 were excluded. Primary outcomes were ICU admission and “overtriage” to the ICU, defined by: ICU stay ≤ 1 day; hospital stay ≤ 2 days; no intubation; no neurosurgery; and discharged to home. Mixed effects multivariable models were used to identify patient and facility characteristics associated with these outcomes.

Results

A total of 595,171 patients were included, 44.7% of whom were admitted to an ICU; 17.3% of these met the criteria for overtriage. Compared with adults, children < 2 years were more likely to be admitted to an ICU (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.16–1.26) and to be overtriaged (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.88–2.25). Similarly, patients with isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage were at greater risk of both ICU admission (RR 2.36, 95% CI 2.31–2.41) and overtriage (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.17–1.28). The probabilities of ICU admission and overtriage varied as much as 16- and 11-fold across hospitals, respectively; median risk ratios were 1.67 and 1.53, respectively. The likelihood of these outcomes did not vary substantially with the characteristics of the treating facility.

Conclusions

There is considerable variability in ICU admission practices for mild TBI across the USA, and some of these patients may not require ICU-level care. Refined ICU use in mild TBI may allow for reduced resource utilization without jeopardizing patient outcomes.

Keywords

Traumatic brain injury Intensive care units Health resources 

Notes

Author Contributions

RHB drafted the manuscript, designed the study, and conducted the analysis. AQ contributed to the manuscript, designed the study, and conducted the analysis. FPR and MSV contributed to drafting of the manuscript and to study design.

Source of Support

RHB received partial, indirect salary support via an educational grant provided to the University of Washington Department of Neurological Surgery by Codman Neuro, who had no role in the design, conduct, or reporting of this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado V. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–54.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yun BJ, Borczuk P, Wang L, Dorner S, White BA, Raja AS. Evaluation of a low-risk mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial hemorrhage emergency department observation protocol. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;61(43):113.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ratcliff JJ, Adeoye O, Lindsell CJ, et al. ED disposition of the Glasgow Coma Scale 13 to 15 traumatic brain injury patient: analysis of the transforming research and clinical knowledge in TBI study. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(8):844–50.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ament JD, Greenan KN, Tertulien P, Galante JM, Nishijima DK, Zwienenberg M. Medical necessity of routine admission of children with mild traumatic brain injury to the intensive care unit. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;19(6):668–74.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nishijima DK, Sena M, Galante JM, et al. Derivation of a clinical decision instrument to identify adult patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk for requiring ICU admission. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;63(4):448–56.e2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nishijima DK, Haukoos JS, Newgard CD, et al. Variability of ICU use in adult patients with minor traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(5):509–517.e4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marincowitz C, Lecky FE, Townend W, Borakati A, Fabbri A, Sheldon TA. The risk of deterioration in GCS13–15 patients with traumatic brain injury identified by computed tomography imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(5):703–18.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phelan HA, Richter AA, Scott WW, et al. Does isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage merit a lower intensity level of observation than other traumatic brain injury? J Neurotrauma. 2014;31(20):1733–6.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borczuk P, Penn J, Peak D, Chang Y. Patients with traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage are at low risk for deterioration or neurosurgical intervention. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1504–9.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pruitt P, Penn J, Peak D, Borczuk P. Identifying patients with mild traumatic intracranial hemorrhage at low risk of decompensation who are safe for ED observation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(2):255–9.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greene NH, Kernic MA, Vavilala MS, Rivara FP. Validation of ICDPIC software injury severity scores using a large regional trauma registry. Inj Prev. 2015;21(5):325–30.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marr AL, Coronado VG. Central nervous system injury surveillance data submission standards-2002. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2004.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maas AIR, Stocchetti N, Bullock R. Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(8):728–41.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rimel RW, Giordani B, Barth JT, Boll TJ, Jane JA. Disability caused by minor head injury. Neurosurgery. 1981;9(3):221–8.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jagoda AS, Bazarian JJ, Bruns JJ, et al. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2008;52(6):714–48.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, et al. ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1553–602.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kleinman ME, Chameides L, Schexnayder SM, et al. Part 14: pediatric advanced life support: 2010 American heart association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2010;122(18 Suppl 3):S876–908.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Goske MJ, Salisbury SR, Forman HP. Rising use of CT in child visits to the Emergency Department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology. 2011;259(3):793–801.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabe-Kesketh S, Skrondal A. Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata, volume 2: categorical responses, counts, and survival. College Station: Stata Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Austin PC, Stryhn H, Leckie G, Merlo J. Measures of clustering and heterogeneity in multilevel Poisson regression analyses of rates/count data. Stat Med. 2018;37(4):572–89.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Myers SR, Branas CC, French B, Nance ML, Carr BG. A national analysis of pediatric trauma care utilization and outcomes in the United States. Pediatr Emerg Care 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000000902.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Marshall LF, Gautille T, Klauber MR, et al. The outcome of severe closed head injury. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:S28–36.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanak BW, Walcott BP, Nahed BV, et al. Postoperative intensive care unit requirements after elective craniotomy. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(1):165–72.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chesnut RM, Marshall SB, Piek J, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral ischemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 1993;59:121–5.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ivascu FA, Howells GA, Junn FS, Bair HA, Bendick PJ, Janczyk RJ. Rapid warfarin reversal in anticoagulated patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage reduces hemorrhage progression and mortality. J Trauma. 2005;59(5):1131–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moore MM, Pasquale MD, Badellino M. Impact of age and anticoagulation: need for neurosurgical intervention in trauma patients with mild traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):126–30.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grandhi R, Harrison G, Voronovich Z, et al. Preinjury warfarin, but not antiplatelet medications, increases mortality in elderly traumatic brain injury patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):614–21.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Levy AS, Orlando A, Hawkes AP, Salottolo K, Mains CW, Bar-Or D. Should the management of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage differ from concussion in the setting of mild traumatic brain injury? J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1199–204.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quigley MR, Chew BG, Swartz CE, Wilberger JE. The clinical significance of isolated traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):581–4.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Milbrandt EB, Kersten A, Rahim MT, et al. Growth of intensive care unit resource use and its estimated cost in Medicare. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(9):2504–10.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000–2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(1):65–71.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lingsma HF, Yue JK, Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Manley GT, TRACK-TBI Investigators. Outcome prediction after mild and complicated mild traumatic brain injury: external validation of existing models and identification of new predictors using the TRACK-TBI pilot study. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(2):83–94.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators, Perel P, Arango M, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. BMJ. 2008;336(7641):425–9.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jacobs B, Beems T, Stulemeijer M, et al. Outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: age and clinical variables are stronger predictors than CT abnormalities. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(4):655–68.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arabian SS, Marcus M, Captain K, et al. Variability in interhospital trauma data coding and scoring: a challenge to the accuracy of aggregated trauma registries. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(3):359–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert H. Bonow
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alex Quistberg
    • 1
    • 3
  • Frederick P. Rivara
    • 1
    • 4
  • Monica S. Vavilala
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Harborview Injury Prevention Research CenterHarborview Medical CenterSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurological SurgeryUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Environmental & Occupational HealthDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Department of PediatricsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  5. 5.Department of Anesthesiology & Pain MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations