Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 519–520 | Cite as

The Legacy of Jahi McMath

  • Ariane Lewis
Letter to the Editor
  • 142 Downloads

Notes

Author Contributions

A. Lewis was responsible for conception and drafting of the manuscript.

Source of Support

No funding.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lewis A. Reconciling the case of Jahi McMath. Neurocrit Care. 2018;29(1):20–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldschmidt D, Jahi McMath, California teen at center of brain-death controversy, has died [Internet]. CNN.com. 2018. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/29/health/jahi-mcmath-brain-dead-teen-death/index.html. Cited 3 July 2018.
  3. 3.
    Shewmon DA. Chronic “brain death”: meta-analysis and conceptual consequences. Neurology. 1998;51:1538–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    RG15-760730. Latasha Nailah Spears Winkfield, Marvin Winkfield, Sandra Chapman and Jahi McMath vs. Frederick S. Rosen, MD and UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital Oakland. 2015.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewis A, Cahn-Fuller K, Caplan A. Shouldn’t dead be dead?: the search for a uniform definition of death. J Law Med Ethics. 2017;45:112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Neurocritical Care, Departments of Neurology and NeurosurgeryNYU Langone Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations