Advertisement

ERA Forum

pp 1–21 | Cite as

Evidence standards in the judicial review of restrictive measures

  • Fabio FilpoEmail author
Article
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

This article discusses, from a practical point of view, the evidence standards applied by the EU Courts in restrictive measures’ litigation, that is, the rules and practices aimed at establishing who must prove what (allocation of the ‘burden of proof’) and whether any relevant fact has been proven or not (‘standard of proof’). While, in principle, the same rules apply across all fields of litigation, the EU Courts take into account the peculiarities of the restrictive measures’ sector and try to strike a fair balance between the EU institutions’ discretion and the respect for due process and fundamental rights.

Keywords

Restrictive measures Evidence Burden of proof Standard of proof Evidence standards Unfettered evaluation of evidence Presumptions 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Castillo de la Torre, F., Gippini Fournier, E.: Evidence, Proof and Judicial Review in EU Competition Law. Elgar, Cheltenham (2017) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chachko, E.: Foreign affairs in court: lessons from CJEU targeted sanctions jurisprudence. Yale Journal of International Law 44(1), 1–52 (2019) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clausen, F.: Présomptions et contrôle des motifs dans le contentieux des mesures restrictives: développements et (in)certitudes jurisprudentiels: CJUE, 21 avril 2015, Anbouba/Conseil, aff. C-605/13 P et aff. C-630/13 P. Revue des affaires européennes 2, 409–417 (2015) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eckes, C.: The law and practice of EU sanctions. In: Blockmans, S., Koutrakos, P. (eds.) Research Handbook on the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2018) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fartunova, M.: La Preuve Dans Le Droit De l’Union Européenne. Bruylant, Bruxelles (2013) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalintiri, A.: Evidence Standards in EU Competition Enforcement: The EU Approach. Hart, Oxford (2019) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nehl, H.P.: Judicial review of complex socio-economic, technical, and scientific assessments in the European Union. In: Mendes, J. (ed.) EU Executive Discretion and the Limits of Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2019) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Triart, N.:. La portée et l’intensité du contrôle de légalité des mesures restrictives de l’Union européenne (personal communication) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Europäische Rechtsakademie (ERA) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Luxembourg CityLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations