Advertisement

ERA Forum

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 673–692 | Cite as

Data retention: the life, death and afterlife of a directive

  • David FennellyEmail author
Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

In its landmark judgment in Digital Rights Ireland, the Court of Justice of the European Union struck down the Data Retention Directive on the basis that it violated the fundamental rights to privacy and data retention. While the judgment has rightly been praised for its robust protection of fundamental rights, it also leaves important questions unresolved and raises deeper issues about the proper division of competence between the EU and its Member States and the respective roles of the courts and the political organs within the EU’s constitutional structure.

Keywords

Data Retention Directive Directive 2006/24/EC Fundamental rights Right to privacy and data protection 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, D.: A question of trust: report of the investigatory powers review. HM Stationery Office (2015) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron, I.: Balancing data protection and law enforcement needs: Tele2 Sverige and Watson. Common Mark. Law Rev. 54(5), 1467 (2017) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Commission, E.: Evaluation report on the Data Retention Directive. COM(2011) 225 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Commission, E.: Extended Impact Assessment: annex to a proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the retention of data processed in connection with the provision of public electronic communication services and amending Directive 2002/58/EC. SEC(2005) 1131 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fabbrini, F.: Human rights in the digital age: the European Court of Justice ruling in the data retention case and its lessons for privacy and surveillance in the US. Harv. Hum. Rights J. 28, 65 (2015) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Granger, M.-P., Irion, K.: The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland: telling off the EU legislator and teaching a lesson in privacy and data protection. Eur. Law Rev. 39(6), 835 (2014) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lenaerts, K., Van Nuffel, P.: European Union Law, 3rd edn. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2011) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynskey, O.: The Data Retention Directive is incompatible with the rights to privacy and data protection and is invalid in its entirety: Digital Rights Ireland. Common Mark. Law Rev. 51(6), 1789 (2014) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marin, L.: The fate of the Data Retention Directive: about mass surveillance and fundamental rights in the EU legal order. In: Mitsilegas, V., Bergström, M., Konstadinides, T. (eds.) Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2016) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Leary, S.: Balancing rights in a digital age. Ir. Jurist, 60 (2018) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International, P.: National data retention laws since the CJEU’s Tele-2/Watson Judgment (September 2017). Available at https://privacyinternational.org/sites/default/files/2017-10/Data%20Retention_2017_0.pdf
  12. 12.
    Vainio, N., Miettenin, S.: Telecommunications data retention after Digital Rights Ireland: legislative and judicial reactions in the Member States. Int. J. Law Inf. Technol. 23(3), 290 (2015) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ERA 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawTrinity College DublinDublinIreland
  2. 2.Law LibraryDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations