Does the medical autopsy still have a place in the current diagnostic process? A 6-year retrospective study in two French University hospitals
Medical autopsies have been in considerable decline for several decades, in France and worldwide. We aimed to determine whether a medical autopsy still currently has a role to play in diagnosis, by analyzing its performance and diagnostic limitations. This dual-centre retrospective descriptive study included all medical autopsies performed in the university hospitals of Lille and Marseille, France, between January 2007 and December 2012. Autopsies of fetuses or stillborn infants, or those related to sudden infant deaths and research protocols were excluded. 412 medical autopsies were included. The male:female ratio was 1.5:1 and mean age was 27.3 years. Half of all autopsies were pediatric. Regarding anatomical region and/or injury mechanism, a clinical diagnosis was suggested in 52.2% of cases, an autopsy diagnosis in 55.6% and a microscopic diagnosis in 81.8%. There was very low agreement between the clinician’s suggested diagnosis and the final diagnosis, both for organ specific diseases and cause of death. Agreement was moderate between autopsy diagnoses and microscopic diagnoses for organ specific diseases and low for cause of death. From our findings we concluded that an autopsy associated with microscopic examination was still valuable in diagnosing cause of death. Microscopic examination was indispensable to determine certain causes of death.
KeywordsMedical autopsy Pathology Diagnostic procedure Cause of death
Role of author
• Sarah Humez performed the research.
• Marie-Dominique Piercecchi and Claude Alain Maurage designed the research study.
• Julia Torrents, Caroline Capuani, Lucile Tuchtan contributed essential reagents or tools.
• Sarah Humez analysed the data.
• Clémence Delteil wrote the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
The approval of the ethics committee was therefore not necessary.
The informed consent was therefore not necessary.
This research study was however notified to the representative of the Commission on Data Processing and Freedom (CNIL in French).
- 1.Loi de bioéthique de 1994. n°94–654 juillet, 1994. http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000549618. Accessed 26 March 2019.
- 2.Loi de bioéthique de 2004. n°2004–800 août, 2004. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000441469. Accessed 26 March 2019.
- 5.Gosselin B, Gaillard D, Rambaud C. Les autopsies à l’aube de l’an 2000. Ann Pathol. 1999;19S:56–63.Google Scholar
- 6.Hauw JJ. L’Académie nationale de médecine appelle au don post-mortem de cerveau. Acad Nat Méd 2014. http://www.academie-medecine.fr/lacademie-nationale-de-medecine-appelle-au-don-post-mortem-de-cerveau-2/. Accessed 26 March 2019.
- 7.Hoyert DL. The changing profile of autopsied deaths in the United States, 1972-2007. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;67:1–8.Google Scholar
- 21.Zaitoun AM, Fernandez C. The value of histological examination in the audit of hospital autopsies: a quantitative approach. Pathology (Phila). 1998;30:100–4.Google Scholar
- 29.The Royal College of Pathologists, London. Guidelines on autopsy practice. 2002. www.rcpath.org. Accessed 26 March 2019.