Turnaround time data for Coronial autopsies – time to complete forensic post-mortem examination reports and influencing factors for Australia and New Zealand in 2015 and 2010
This study aimed to provide information regarding key performance indicators (KPIs) for forensic pathology in Australia and New Zealand, focusing on the time to complete a Coronial post-mortem examination report. Data was obtained from the National Coronial Information System (NCIS). The mean and median time to complete a post-mortem examination report in 2015 was determined from a sample of 100 cases from each of the nine Coronial jurisdictions. Results of univariate and multivariable analysis of factors potentially influencing the completion time are presented. The multivariable analysis indicated the time to complete a post-mortem examination report was significantly dependent on if any internal examination had been performed, the Coronial jurisdiction and requesting toxicological analysis. The number of days for Coroners to close cases is also presented as well as the number of days for a post-mortem examination to be performed. A comparison between 2015 and 2010 was instigated. However, this data had to be constrained to eight of the Coronial jurisdictions. Within this dataset, the time to complete a post-mortem examination report when an internal examination had been performed was statistically significant greater in 2015. However, the time to complete reports for all Coronial post-mortem examinations in 2015 was not statistically significantly different to 2010. This could be attributed to a higher proportion of post-mortem examinations without internal examination (‘external only’) in 2015. The time to perform a post-mortem examination following the death being reported to a Coroner increased, but the time for Coroners to close a case decreased.
KeywordsKey performance indicators Turnaround time Post-mortem examination Forensic pathology Coronial
Staff of the National Coronial Information System (NCIS).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
University of Adelaide Human Research Ethics Committee (H-2017-006) and the Justice Human Research Ethics Committee (M0389).
- 1.Saar E, Bugeja L, Ranson DL. National Coronial Information System: Epidemiology and the Coroner in Australia. Acad For Path. 2017;7:582–90.Google Scholar
- 2.Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council. Subcommittee on Autopsy Practice, Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council and South Australia. Department of Human Services. The national code of ethical autopsy practice. Department of Human Services. Adelaide: AHMAC Secretariat; 2002.Google Scholar
- 5.NCIS Operational statistics. http://www.ncis.org.au/about-the-data/operational-statistics/. Accessed December 2017.
- 6.Phillips B, Little D, McDougall J, Langlois NEI. The Coronial system and determining manner of death in Australia - an overview. Acad For Path. 2015;5:436–42.Google Scholar
- 7.Hanzlick R, Hunsaker JC, Davis GJ. A guide for manner of death classification. 1st ed. Atlanta: National Association of Medical Examiners; 2002.Google Scholar
- 13.Langlois NEI, Scott G, Koszyca B, Blumbergs P. Contribution of neuropathological examination of the retained brain to Coronial post-mortem examination cases: an audit. Pathology. 2016;48:96–8.Google Scholar
- 19.Ranson D. The role of post-mortem imaging in preliminary examinations under the coroners act 2008 (Vic): a forensic pathologist’s perspective. J Leg Med. 2014;21:774–9.Google Scholar
- 22.New South Wales Coroners Act 2009. Sydney: New South Wales Government; 2012. https://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/inforce/b864672a-d308-c9d5-ba2a-8ed827ad721c/2009-41.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2018.
- 23.Coroners act 2008. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria; 2008 [amended 2017 Jul 1]. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca2008120.pdf. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
- 27.My Health Record. https://www.myhealthrecord.gov.au/. Accessed June 2018.