Advertisement

Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 131–132 | Cite as

More interdisciplinary research is needed in forensic medicine

  • Claas T. BuschmannEmail author
Commentary

Abstract

Forensic routine consists of more than just the classical legal medicine described in textbooks. It is often crucial to answer forensic questions that involve numerous interfaces with other medical disciplines. These interdisciplinary questions that arise in routine autopsy proceedures can also be addressed scientifically, despite decreasing autopsy numbers. Forensic medicine is not only able to generate epidemiologically relevant data, but can also contribute to the establishment of new treatment pathways based on forensic data (“preventive pathology”), at least for certain autopsy sub-populations. In particular, this applies to cases that present prior to hospitalization, particularly with regard to emergency medical and cardiological issues.

Keywords

Forensic medicine Autopsy Interdisciplinary approach Epidemiology Research 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

The commentary was written in compliance with Ethical Standards.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this type of paper.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this type of paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Buschmann C, Tsokos M, Kleber C. Preventive pathology: the interface of forensic medicine and trauma surgery for pre-hospital trauma management. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015;11:317–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kleber C, Giesecke MT, Tsokos M, Haas NP, Schaser KD, Stefan P, et al. Overall distribution of trauma-related deaths in Berlin 2010: advancement or stagnation of German trauma management? World J Surg. 2012;36:2125–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kleber C, Giesecke MT, Lindner T, Haas NP, Buschmann C. Requirement for a structured algorithm in cardiac arrest following major trauma: epidemiology, management errors, and preventability of traumatic deaths in Berlin. Resuscitation. 2014;85:405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, Khalifa GE, Alfonzo A, Bierens JJ, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2015;95:148–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurz S, Falk V, Kempfert J, Gieb M, Ruschinski T, Kukucka M, et al. Insight into the incidence of acute aortic dissection in the German region of Berlin and Brandenburg. Int J Cardiol. 2017;241:326–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buschmann C, Schulz T, Tsokos M, Kleber C. Emergency medicine techniques and the forensic autopsy. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2013;9:48–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ondruschka B, Baier C, Bayer R, Hammer N, Dreßler J, Bernhard M. Chest compression-associated injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions versus automated chest compression devices (LUCAS II) – a forensic autopsy-based comparison. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-018-0024-5.
  8. 8.
    Lacour P, Buschmann C, Storm C, Nee J, Parwani AS, Huemer M, et al. Cardiac implantable electronic device interrogation at forensic autopsy: an underestimated resource? Circulation. 2018;137:2730–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mittmann P, Ernst A, Todt I, Seidl R, Wilms K, Skulj AF, et al. Superior canal dehiscence: a comparative postmortem multislice computed tomography study. OTO Open. 2018;2:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic SciencesBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations