To find the sonographic features of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FV-PTC) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of 2017 ACR TI-RADS in FV-PTC.
From June 2017 to June 2019, 104 FV-PTC patients (106 nodules) and 337 classic papillary thyroid carcinoma (C-PTC) patients (343 nodules) with both sonograms and pathologic results were included. Sonographic features of FV-PTC and C-PTC were evaluated and compared, and 2017 ACR TI-RADS scores and levels were calculated.
Pathologically, the incidence of Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and extrathyroidal extension was higher in the FV-PTC group. Most of both the FV-PTC and C-PTC groups were diagnosed as PTC or suspicious PTC by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB). FV-PTC tended to be isoechoic, while most nodules of C-PTC were hypoechoic or very hypoechoic. Compared with C-PTC, FV-PTC had lower percentages of a taller-than-wide shape (11.3% vs. 46.6%) and lobulated or irregular margin (33.0% vs. 61.8%), and a higher percentage of extrathyroidal extension (20.8% vs. 8.2%). FV-PTC featured macrocalcifications, whereas punctate echogenic foci were more frequently seen in the C-PTC group. Other characteristic US appearances of FV-PTC included uneven hypoechoic halo and peripheral vascularity. The mean TI-RADS score of FV-PTC cases was lower in the FV-PTC group, 11.3%, 44.3%, and 42.5% of which were categorized as TI-RADS 3, 4, and 5, respectively.
FV-PTC features isoechoic appearance, macrocalcifications, uneven hypoechoic halo, and peripheral vascularity on US, with lower incidences of microcalcifications and taller-than-wide shape, and tends to have lower TI-RADS scores and levels. For the nodules categorized as TI-RADS 3 or 4, the FNAB criteria should be broaden when these nodules have FV-PTC US features.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
S.Y. Sohn, J.J. Lee, J.H. Lee, Molecular profile and clinicopathologic features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma. Pathol. Oncol. Res. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-019-00639-8
S.Y. Hahn, J.H. Shin, H.K. Lim, S.L. Jung, Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in a multicentre study. Clin. Endocrinol. 86, 113–119 (2017)
G.H. Daniels, What if many follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas are not malignant? A review of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma and a proposal for a new classification. Endocr. Pract. 17, 768–787 (2011)
X. Shi, R. Liu, F. Basolo, R. Giannini, X. Shen, D. Teng, H. Guan, Z. Shan, W. Teng, T.J. Musholt, K. Al-Kuraya, L. Fugazzola, C. Colombo, E. Kebebew, B. Jarzab, A. Czarniecka, B. Bendlova, V. Sykorova, M. Sobrinho-Simões, P. Soares, Y.K. Shong, T.Y. Kim, S. Cheng, S.L. Asa, D. Viola, R. Elisei, L. Yip, C. Mian, F. Vianello, Y. Wang, S. Zhao, G. Oler, J.M. Cerutti, E. Puxeddu, S. Qu, Q. Wei, H. Xu, C.J. O’Neill, M.S. Sywak, R. Clifton-Bligh, A.K. Lam, G. Riesco-Eizaguirre, P. Santisteban, H. Yu, G. Tallini, E.H. Holt, V. Vasko, M. Xing, Differential clinicopathological risk and prognosis of major papillary thyroid cancer variants. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 101, 264–274 (2016)
J. Rosaí, G. Zampi, M.L. Carcangiu, Papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. A discussion of its several morphologic expressions, with particular emphasis on the follicular variant. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 7, 809–817 (1983)
A.E. Walts, J.M. Mirocha, S. Bose, Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC): histological features, BRAF V600E mutation, and lymph node status. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 141, 1749–1756 (2015)
C. Anuradha, M.T. Manipadam, H.S. Asha, N. Dukhabandhu, D. Abraham, M.J. Paul, Can new ultrasound signs help in identifying follicular variant of papillary carcinoma of thyroid?—A pilot study. Ultrasound Int. Open 2, E47–E53 (2016)
D. Ozdemir, R. Ersoy, N. Cuhaci, D. Arpaci, E.P. Ersoy, B. Korukluoglu, G. Guler, B. Cakir, Classical and follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of clinical, ultrasonographical, cytological, and histopathological features in 444 patients. Endocr. Pathol. 22, 58–65 (2011)
S.C. Ng, S.F. Kuo, C.C. Hua, B.Y. Huang, K.C. Chiang, Y.Y. Chu, C. Hsueh, J.D. Lin, Differentiation of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma from classic papillary thyroid carcinoma: an ultrasound analysis and complement to fine-needle aspiration cytology. J. Ultrasound Med. 37, 667–674 (2018)
D.S. Kim, J.H. Kim, D.G. Na, S.H. Park, E. Kim, K.H. Chang, C.H. Sohn, Y.H. Choi, Sonographic features of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinomas in comparison with conventional papillary thyroid carcinomas. J. Ultrasound Med. 28, 1685–1692 (2009)
J.H. Yoon, H.J. Kwon, E.K. Kim, H.J. Moon, J.Y. Kwak, The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: characteristics of preoperative ultrasonography and cytology. Ultrasonography 35, 47–54 (2016)
L. Gao, X. Xi, Y. Jiang, X. Yang, Y. Wang, S. Zhu, X. Lai, X. Zhang, R. Zhao, B. Zhang, Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK-TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules. Endocrine 64, 90–96 (2019)
F.N. Tessler, W.D. Middleton, E.G. Grant, Thyroid imaging reporting and data system (TI-RADS): a user’s guide. Radiology 287, 29–36 (2018)
E.J. Ha, D.G. Na, W.J. Moon, Y.H. Lee, N. Choi, Diagnostic performance of ultrasound-based risk-stratification systems for thyroid nodules: comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines. Thyroid 28, 1532–1537 (2018)
G. Grani, L. Lamartina, V. Ascoli, D. Bosco, M. Biffoni, L. Giacomelli, M. Maranghi, R. Falcone, V. Ramundo, V. Cantisani, S. Filetti, C. Durante, Reducing the number of unnecessary thyroid biopsies while improving diagnostic accuracy: toward the “Right” TIRADS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 104, 95–102 (2019)
E.J. Jeon, Y.J. Jeong, S.H. Park, C.H. Cho, H.S. Shon, E.D. Jung, Ultrasonographic characteristics of the follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer according to the tumor size. J. Korean Med. Sci. 31, 397–402 (2016)
F.N. Tessler, W.D. Middleton, E.G. Grant, J.K. Hoang, L.L. Berland, S.A. Teefey, J.J. Cronan, M.D. Beland, T.S. Desser, M.C. Frates, L.W. Hammers, U.M. Hamper, J.E. Langer, C.C. Reading, L.M. Scoutt, A.T. Stavros, A.C.R. Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and data system (TI-RADS): white paper of the ACR TI-RADS committee. J. Am. Coll. Radio. 14, 587–595 (2017)
Y.E. Nikiforov, R.R. Seethala, G. Tallini, Z.W. Baloch, F. Basolo, L.D. Thompson, J.A. Barletta, B.M. Wenig, G.A. Al, K. Kakudo, T.J. Giordano, V.A. Alves, E. Khanafshar, S.L. Asa, A.K. El-Naggar, W.E. Gooding, S.P. Hodak, R.V. Lloyd, G. Maytal, O. Mete, M.N. Nikiforova, V. Nosé, M. Papotti, D.N. Poller, P.M. Sadow, A.S. Tischler, R.M. Tuttle, K.B. Wall, V.A. LiVolsi, G.W. Randolph, R.A. Ghossein, Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2, 1023–1029 (2016)
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell 159, 676–690 (2014)
L.E. Henke, J.D. Pfeifer, T.J. Baranski, T. DeWees, P.W. Grigsby, Long-term outcomes of follicular variant vs classic papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr. Connect 7, 1226–1235 (2018)
H.S. Seo, D.H. Lee, S.H. Park, H.S. Min, D.G. Na, Thyroid follicular neoplasms: can sonography distinguish between adenomas and carcinomas. J. Clin. Ultrasound 37, 493–500 (2009)
K.T. Chem, J. Rosai, Follicular variant of thyroid papillary carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of six cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1, 123–130 (1977)
J.H. Shin, B.K. Han, E.Y. Ko, Y.L. Oh, J.H. Kim, Differentiation of widely invasive and minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma with sonography. Eur. J. Radiol. 74, 453–457 (2010)
J.Z. Zhang, B. Hu, Sonographic features of thyroid follicular carcinoma in comparison with thyroid follicular adenoma. J. Ultrasound Med. 33, 221–227 (2014)
Z.W. Baloch, P.K. Gupta, G.H. Yu, M.J. Sack, V.A. LiVolsi, Follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Cytologic and histologic correlation. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 111, 216–222 (1999)
L. Zhao, X.Y. Zhu, R. Jiang, M. Xu, N. Wang, G.G. Chen, Z.M. Liu, Role of GPER1, EGFR and CXCR1 in differentiating between malignant follicular thyroid carcinoma and benign follicular thyroid adenoma. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8, 11236–11247 (2015)
This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016 YFA0201400).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, F., Chen, W. Sonographic features of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FV-PTC) and diagnostic performance of the 2017 ACR TI-RADS in FV-PTC. Endocrine (2020) doi:10.1007/s12020-019-02184-5
- Follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FV-PTC)
- ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS)