Advertisement

Applicability of Low-Cost Binders for the Quantitative Elemental Analysis of Urinary Stones Using EDXRF Based on Fundamental Parameter Approach

  • Abdallah A. ShaltoutEmail author
  • Maram M. Dabi
  • Mohamed M. Ibrahim
  • Ahmed S. Al-Ghamdi
  • Essam Elnagar
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The pressed powder sample is a common method for elemental analysis using X-ray fluorescence analysis whereas suitable light hydrocarbon materials should be added to the sample as a binder. The present study demonstrates the applicability of using different commercial binders for elemental analysis of urinary stone samples. In order to confirm the obtained results, a comparison with pure chemical grade binders was presented. Different commercial and pure binders were tested for quantitative elemental analysis of urinary stones, namely, cellulose, starch, wax, and urea. Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) was used for elemental analysis. Differential thermal analysis was used to estimate the loss on ignition (LOI) in the urinary stone samples. The signal to background ratios (I/IB) of the different detected elements in the commercial and pure binders were calculated, compared, and studied at eight different photon energies starting from 2.5 up to 37 keV. Standard-less quantitative analysis method based on the fundamental parameter approach was applied for elemental analysis of selected urinary stones. The commercial and low-cost binders could be an excellent alternative binder for urinary stone analysis using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence. The commercial binders could provide an advantage as pure chemical grade binders or even better especially at photon energy higher than 10 keV. The best commercial binder candidate was found to be the wax. The quantitative analysis results using commercial and pure chemical grade binders give good agreement results, which indicate the applicability of commercial binders for quantitative elemental analysis of urinary stones in the form of pressed powder samples.

Keywords

Energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) Binders Pressed powder sample Background ratios (I/IBUrinary stone samples 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the volunteers who participated in this research.

Authors’ Contribution

Abdallah A. Shaltout, Maram M. Dabi, Mohamed M. Ibrahim, Ahmed S. Al-Ghamdi, and Essam El-Naggar certify that they have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content, including participation in the concept, design, analysis, writing, or revision of the manuscript. Furthermore, each author certifies that this material or similar material has not been and will not be submitted to or published in any other publication.

Funding

This study has no any financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Li XL, An SQ, Liu YX, Yu ZS, Zhang Q (2018) Investigation of a high-pressure pressed powder pellet technique for the analysis of coal by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 132: 170–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2017.11.003
  2. 2.
    Shibata Y, Suyama J, Kitano M, Nakamura T (2009) X-ray fluorescence analysis of Cr, as, se, cd, hg, and Pb in soil using pressed powder pellet and loose powder methods. X-Ray Spectrom 38(5):410–416.  https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.1195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kuz’mina TG, Troneva MA, Kononkova NN, Romashova TV (2017) Error of sample preparation in pressing emitters for X-ray fluorescence analysis. Journal of Analytical Chemistry 72(3):272–278Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Atomic Energy Agency (1997) Sampling, storage and sample preparation procedures for X ray fluorescence analysis of environmental materials. International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jenkins R (1999) X-ray fluorescence spectrometry, vol 152. Chemical Analysis-A series of monographs on analytical chemistry and its application, Second edn. Johan Wiley & Sons, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beckhoff B, Kanngießer B, Langhoff N, Wedell R, Wolff H (2007) Handbook of practical X-ray fluorescence analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haines PJ, Reading M, Wilburn FW (1998) Chapter 5 - Differential Thermal Analysis and Differential Scanning Calorimetry. In: Brown ME (ed) Handbook of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, vol 1. Elsevier Science B.V., pp 279–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4374(98)80008-3
  8. 8.
    Hatami M, Ganji DD, Sheikholeslami M (2017) Chapter 1 - introduction to differential transformation method. In: Differential transformation method for mechanical engineering problems. Academic Press, pp 1–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805190-0.00001-2
  9. 9.
    Wagner M (2018) Chapter 21 - Overview of standard methods for thermal analysis. In: Thermal analysis in practice. Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, pp 336–346.  https://doi.org/10.3139/9781569906446.021
  10. 10.
    Berényi M, Liptay G (1971) The use of thermal analysis in medical science with special reference to nephroliths. J Therm Anal 3(4):437–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02188652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell BD, Birnie AC (1970) Biological Materials. In: Mackenzie RC (ed) Differential thermal analysis, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 673–704Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keattch CJ, Dollimore D (1975) An introduction to thermogravimetry, 2nd edn. Heyden, EnlargedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sherman J (1954) The correlation between fluorescent X-ray intensity and chemical composition. ASTM Spec Tech Publ I57:27–33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sherman J (1955) The theoretical derivation of fluorescent X-ray intensities from mixtures. Spectrochim Acta 7:283–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shiraiwa T, Fujino N (1966) Theoretical calculation of fluorescent X-ray intensities in fluorescent X-ray spectrochemical analysis. Jpn J Appl Phys 5:886–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaltout AA, Gomma MM, Ali-Bik MW (2012) Utilization of standardless analysis algorithms using WDXRF and XRD for Egyptian iron ore identification. X-Ray Spectrom 41(6):355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shaltout AA, Moharram MA, Mostafa NY (2012) Wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis using fundamental parameter approach of Catha edulis and other related plant samples. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc 67:74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shaltout AA, Welz B, Ibrahim MA (2011) Influence of the grain size on the quality of standardless WDXRF analysis of river Nile sediments. Microchem J 99(2):356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spectroscopy Department, Physics DivisionNational Research CentreCairoEgypt
  2. 2.Physics Department, Faculty of scienceTaif UniversityTaifKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceKafrelsheikh UniversityKafrelsheikhEgypt
  4. 4.Chemistry Department, Faculty of scienceTaif UniversityTaifKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  5. 5.Urology DepartmentKing Abdulaziz Specialist HospitalTaifKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations