Advertisement

Biological Trace Element Research

, Volume 194, Issue 2, pp 596–602 | Cite as

Effect of Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn and Bioaccessibilities in the Hazelnuts Growing in Sakarya, Turkey using In-Vitro Gastrointestinal Extraction Method

  • Huseyin AltundagEmail author
  • Ebru Mutlu
  • Esra Altintig
  • Mustafa Tuzen
Article
  • 110 Downloads

Abstract

Total concentrations of heavy metals such as Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn in different hazelnut samples obtained by different regions of Sakarya city, Turkey were identified for the determination of heavy metal in the first section of this study. In the second section of our study, metal concentrations that can pass to the body by stomach and intestine in case of consuming hazelnuts as in vitro with gastrointestinal methods. It is performed by using enzymes and hydrochloric acid with model intestine and stomach system. In vitro gastrointestinal extraction method aims to identify how much the chemicals obtained by the sample matrices as vegetables, fruits, and soil, which are obtained within daily diet and examines the bioefficacy and bioaccessibility ingesting, used for evaluation of the chemical risk for humans were released. Total metal concentrations in the hazelnuts and metal concentrations passing to the stomach and intestines via in vitro gastrointestinal extraction method were identified with ICP-OES. As the result, heavy metal amounts of hazelnut samples are below the limits identified by Turkish Food Codex (TFC) and World Health Organization (WHO) and in harmony with the literature results so there is no objection in terms of health.

Keywords

In vitro gastrointestinal Extraction method Heavy metal Nuts ICP-OES Microwave digestion 

Notes

Funding Information

This study is financially supported by the Scientific Research Project of Sakarya University (Project No: 2014-50-01-009 and 2017-50-01-018).

References

  1. 1.
    Aksoy A, Öztürk M (1996) Phoenix dactylifera L. as a biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in Turkey. J Trace Microprobe Tech 14:605–614Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang Z, Abuduwaili J, Jiang F (2013) Determination of occurrence characteristics of heavy metals in soil and water environments in Tianshan mountains Central Asia. Anal Lett 46:2122–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sümer A, Adiloğlu S, Çetinkaya O, Adiloğlu A, Sungur A, Akbulak C (2013) Karamenderes havzası topraklarında bazı ağır metallerin (Cr, Ni, Pb) kirliliğinin araştırılması. J Tekirdağ Agricul Faculty:10–11Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Altıntıg E, Altundag H, Tuzen M (2014) Determination of multi element levels in leaves and herbal teas from Turkey by using ICP-OES. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop 28(1):9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lane TW, Saito MA, George GN, Pickering IJ, Prince RC, Morel FM (2005) Biochemistry: a cadmium enzym from a marine diatom. Nature 435(7038):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Codex, Alimenturius (1984) Codex Alimentarius Commission Contaminants. Joint FAO/WHO “Food Standards Program, RomeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ge KY, Chang SY (2001) Dietary intake of some essential micronutrients in China. Biomed Environ Sci 14:318–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tontisirin K, Clarke R (2001) Science as the basis for public health decisions in nutrition and food safety in Asia. Biomed Environ Sci 14:1–13Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen JS (2001) The role of science in Codex standards. Biomed Environ Sci 14:145–148Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ng J, Juhasz A, Smith E, Naidu R (2010) Contaminant bioavailability and bioaccessibility - Part 1: A, Scientific and Technical Review.10. Food and Nutritional Board Recommended Intake for Individuals, Dietary Reference Intakes [DRIs] National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sönmez O, Aydemir S, Saygan E (2007) Kurşun ve kurşun biyo-alınabilirliğinin belirlenmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 11(3/4):1–8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozdemir F, Topuz A, Doğan U, Karkacıer M (1998) Fındık Çeşitlerinin Bazı Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özellikleri. Gıda 23(1):37–41Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Muslu C (2002) Sakarya İlinde Yetiştirilen Fındık Türlerinde Demir ve Bakır Elementlerinin AAS ile Tayini. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarakçıoğlu C, Yalcin SR, Bayrak A, Kucuk M, Karabacak H (2003) Ordu Yöresinde Yeti ştirilen Fındık Bitkisinin (Corylus avellana L.) Beslenme Durumunun Toprak ve Yaprak Analizleriyle Belirlenmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 9(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reiser S, Smith JC Jr, Mertz W, Holbrook JT, Scholfield DJ, Powell AS, Canfield WK, Canary JJ (1985) Indices of copper status in humans consuming a typical American diet containing either fructose or starch. Am J Clin Nutr 42:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turnlnnd JR et al (1989) Copper absorption and retention in young men at three levels of dietary copper by use of the stable isotope 65CU. Am J Clin Nutr 49:870–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (1982) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants: twenty-sixth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives [meeting held in Rome from 19 to 28 April 1982], World Health Organization technical report series; no. 683Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Serifoğlu GA (1993) Ege bölgesi ballarının bazı ağır metal birikimlerinin saptanması, Doktora Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmirGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cabrera C, Lloris F, Gimenez R, Olalla M, Lopez MC (2003) Mineral content in legumes and nuts: contribution to the Spanish, dietary intake. Sci Total Environ 308:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saraçoğlu S, Tüzen M, Soylak M (2009) Evaluation of trace element contents of dried apricot samples from Turkey. J Hazard Mater 167(1-3):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alpaslan M, Güneş A, İnal A (2013) Deneme Tekniği (3b.). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi, Ankara, p 430Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dundar MS, Bahcivanci E, Muslu C (2002) Influence of variety and geographical region on mineral contents of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) varieties. Acta Chim Slov 49(3):537–544Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bahçıvancı E, (2002) Sakarya İlinde Yetiştirilen Fındık Türlerinde Mangan ve Çinko Elementlerinin AAS ile Tayini. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simşek A, Aslantaş R (1996) Fındığın Bileşimi ve İnsan Beslenmesi Açısından Önemi. Gıda 24(3):209–216Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Köksal Aİ, Artik N, Şimşek A, Güneş N (2006) Nutrient Composition of Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Varieties Cultivated İn Turkey. Food Chem 99:509–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smart GA, Sherlock JC (1987) Nickel in foods and the diet. Food Addit Comtam A 4:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grace ND, Lee J (1990) Effect of Co, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Sc and Zn supplementation on the elemental content of soft tissues and bone in sheep grazing ryegrass White Clover Pasture. New Zealand J Agricul Res 33:635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    World Health Organization, WHO (1982) Toxicological evaluation of certain food additives, joint FAO/WHO expert committee of food additives. WHQ Food Additives, series number 17. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    National Research Council (2000) Dietary reference intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, arsenik, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdeum, nickel, silicon, vanadium and zinc, Washington. Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients, Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    WHO (1996) Zinc. In: Trace elements in human nutrition and health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huseyin Altundag
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ebru Mutlu
    • 1
  • Esra Altintig
    • 1
  • Mustafa Tuzen
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of ChemistrySakarya UniversitySakaryaTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Chemistry DepartmentTokat Gaziosmanpaşa UniversityTokatTurkey
  3. 3.King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Research Institute, Center for Environment and WaterDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations