Heavy Metals in Indigenous Preparations Used for Sex Selection During Pregnancy in India
Indigenous preparations (IPs) have evoked a considerable interest in alleviating infections and chronic diseases and improving wellbeing. While such formulations have been a part of traditional practice in several countries and many have been reviewed scientifically for their claims, several of them until date remain to be investigated. A class of IPs for sex selection by Indian pregnant women exists with an aim of begetting a male offspring. In view of the leads obtained from our previous studies on detrimental effects of the newborn, for instance stillbirths and congenital malformations, we attempted to investigate the samples for heavy metal toxicity. Three samples were chosen following phytochemical analysis and reproductive toxicity of such preparations under in vivo conditions. The selected samples were examined for heavy metals—lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury using Microwave-assisted atomic absorption spectroscopy. The upper limit level of lead, mercury, and cadmium was found to be 18.56, 0.11, and 0.84 mg/kg respectively whereas arsenic was not detected. The levels of lead and mercury were found to be manifolds high in the IP samples that were primarily contributed by its constituents. The results of our study indicate the potential risk conferred upon, to both the mother and fetus on account of high levels of lead, mercury, and cadmium.
KeywordsSex selection Indigenous preparations Heavy metals Lead Mercury Pregnancy
AG conceptualized the study and provided overall guidance. PR and SBN reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript. SB, RS, RG, AG provided inputs and finalized the manuscript. All the authors agreed with the final version of the manuscript. All other Authors have read the manuscript and have agreed to submit it in its current form for consideration for publication in the Journal.
This study was conducted as part of a large study supported by Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi; Science and Technology Council, Haryana. The funding body had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This toxicity study was a subset of a larger study funded by Department of Science and Technology (DST) under SEED division and S&T Council, Haryana, for which approval was sought from Indian Institute of Public Health (IIPHD) Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC).
Consent to Publish
The study involved collection of samples of indigenous medicine from different genres of the society. Given the sensitive nature of the topic, we did not take a written consent but an assurance was given by the research team that their details would be kept confidential. Due permission was taken from our IEC.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 4.Ashish B, Neeti K, Himanshu K (2013) Copper toxicity: a comprehensive study. Res J Recent Sci 2:58–67Google Scholar
- 5.Chavan NS, Jawale CS (2013) Evaluation of the range of heavy metal concentration and its levels of accumulation in the fish sample of river Savitri at Mahad-MIDC, MS, India. Int Res J Environment Sci 2(7):69–75Google Scholar
- 14.Neogi SB, Negandhi PH, Sandhu N, Gupta RK, Ganguli A, Zodpey S, Singh A, Singh A, Gupta R (2015) Indigenous medicine use for sex selection during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: a population-based case-control study in Haryana, India. Drug Saf 38(9):789–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Rai P, et al (2018) Application of C. elegans for elucidating reproductive toxicity of indigenous preparations claimed for sex selection in India. Under publicationGoogle Scholar
- 26.Hu H, Téllez-Rojo MM, Bellinger D, Smith D, Ettinger AS, Lamadrid-Figueroa H, Schwartz J, Schnaas L, Mercado-García A, Hernández-Avila M (2006) Fetal lead exposure at each stage of pregnancy as a predictor of infant mental development. Environ Health Perspect 114(11):1730–1735CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 31.Anonymous (Nutrition C for FS and A. Metals—questions and answers on lead in foods [Internet]. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/Metals/ucm557424.htm. Accessed 31 Oct 2017
- 33.Anonymous (2004) Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to mercury and methylmercury in food. EFSA J 34:1–14Google Scholar
- 36.Organization WH (2011) Cadmium in drinking-water. (Geneva)Google Scholar