Advertisement

Effect of Biohythane Production from Distillery Spent Wash with Addition of Landfill Leachate and Sewage Wastewater

  • Vijaya Krishna Saranga
  • P. Kiran Kumar
  • Kavita Verma
  • D. Bhagawan
  • V. HimabinduEmail author
  • M. Lakshmi Narasu
Article

Abstract

Rapid development of the industrial and domestic sectors has led to the rise of several energy and environmental issues. In accordance with sustainable development and waste minimization issues, biohydrogen production along with biomethane production via two-stage fermentation process using microorganisms from renewable sources has received considerable attention. In the present study, biohythane production with simultaneous wastewater treatment was studied in a two-stage (Biohydrogen and Biomethane) fermentation process under anaerobic conditions. Optimization of high organic content (COD) distillery spent wash effluent (DSPW) with dilution using sewage wastewater was carried out. Addition of leachate as a nutrient source was also studied for effective biohythane production. The experimental results showed that the maximum biohythane production at optimized concentration (substrate concentration of 60 g/L with 30% of leachate as a nutrient source) was 67 mmol/L bio-H2 and with bio-CH4 production of 42 mmol/L.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Biohydrogen Biomethane Biohythane Distillery spent wash Leachate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the University Grants Commission (UGC) BSR Fellow, Government of India/Bharat Sarkar - Sanctions order No. F.18-1/2011(BSR) for providing facilities and Dr. D Bhagawan would like to thank the UGC for the encouragement to carry out the research work (order No. F./31-1/2017/PDFSS-2017-18- TEL-14164 and Dr. Kavita Verma would like to acknowledge the Department of Biotechnology (DBT-RA Program in Biotechnology and Life Sciences), Government of India/Bharat Sarkar.

Funding Information

This work received financial support from the University Grants Commission (UGC) BSR Fellow, Government of India/Bharat Sarkar – Sanctions, order no. F.18-1/2011(BSR).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim, S.-H., Mudhoo, A., Pugazhendhi, A., Saratale, R. G., Surroop, D., Jeetah, P., Park, J.-H., Saratale, G. D., & Kumar, G. (2019). A perspective on galactose-based fermentative hydrogen production from macroalgal biomass: trends and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 280, 447–458.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thangavel, M., Arianna, B., Karthik, R., Desika, P., Manickam, M., Richard, P. L., & Arivalagan, P. (2018). Review on cultivation and thermochemical conversion of microalgae to fuels and chemicals: process evaluation and knowledge gaps. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1053–1064.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu, Q., Jing, W., Benyi, X., Ming, C., Toshimasa, H., Jun, C., & Yu-You, L. (2019). Strategy of adjusting recirculation ratio for biohythane production via recirculated temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of food waste. Energy, 179, 1235–1245.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiran, K. P., Vijaya, K. S., Chaitanya, N., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., & Lakshmi Narasu, M. (2017). Effect of operational parameters on biohydrogen production from dairy wastewater in batch and continuous reactors. Biofuels, 8(6), 693–699.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Preeti, M., Balachandar, G., & Debabrata, D. (2017). Improvement in biohythane production using organic solid waste and distillery effluent. Waste Management, 66, 70–78.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shiva, K. S., Ramakrishna, S. U. B., Vijaya, K. S., Srilatha, K., Rama Devi, B., & Himabindu, V. (2018). Synthesis of titanium (IV) oxide composite membrane for hydrogen production through alkaline water electrolysis. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 54–61.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bolzonella, D., Battista, F., Cavinato, C., Gottardo, M., Micolucci, F., Lyberatos, G., & Pavan, P. (2018). Recent developments in biohythane production from household food wastes: a review. Bioresource Technology, 257, 311–319.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jiravut, S., Chonticha, M., Poonsuk, P., & Sompong, O-T. (2018). Pilot-scale of biohythane production from palm oil mill effluent by two-stage thermophilic anaerobic fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 3347–3355.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jemal, F., Nurelegne, T., & Stijn, W.H.V.H. (2017). Adsorption of distillery spent wash on activated bagasse fly ash: kinetics and thermodynamics. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 5(6), 5381–5388.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sridevi, K., Sivaraman, E., & Mullai, P. (2014). Back propagation neural network modelling of biodegradation and fermentative biohydrogen production using distillery wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresource Technology, 165, 233–240.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karadag, D., & Puhakka, J. A. (2010). Enhancement of anaerobic hydrogen production by iron and nickel. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(16), 8554–8560.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Preeti, M., & Debabrata, D. (2014). Biohydrogen production from Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08 using distillery effluent. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 7496–7507.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Da Silva, T. L., Gouveia, L., & Reis, A. (2014). Integrated microbial processes for biofuels and high value-added products: the way to improve the cost effectiveness of biofuel production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(3), 1043–1053.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saharan, B. S., Sahu, R. K., & Sharma, D. (2011). A review on biosurfactants: fermentation, current developments and perspectives. Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Journal, 2011, 1–14.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ZhiPing, L., WenHui, W., Ping, S., JinSong, G., & Jin, C. (2015). Characterization of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate during the combined treatment process of air stripping, Fenton, SBR and coagulation. Waste Management, 41, 111–118.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Public Health Association. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vijaya Krishna, S., Kiran Kumar, P., Kavita, V., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., Lakshmi Narasu, M., & Radhika, S. (2019). Enhancement of biohydrogen production from distillery spent wash effluent using electro-coagulation process. Energy, Ecology and Environment., 4(4), 160–165.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-019-00122-9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Panga Kiran, K., Vijaya Krishna, S., Verma, K., Pooja, K., Bhagawan, D., & Himabindu, V. (2018). Phycoremediation of sewage wastewater and industrial flue gases for biomass generation from microalgae. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 25, 133–146.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vijaya Krishna, S., Kiran Kumar, P., Chaitanya, N., Bhagawan, D., Himabindu, V., & Lakshmi Narasu, M. (2017). Biohydrogen production from brewery effluent in a batch and continuous reactor with anaerobic mixed microbial consortia. Biofuels, 8(6), 701–707.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yemm, E. W., & Willis, A. J. (1954). The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. The Biochemical Journal, 57(3), 508–514.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiran Kumar, P., Vijaya Krishna, S., Kavita, V., Pooja, K., Bhagawan, D., Srilatha, K., & Himabindu, V. (2018a). Bio oil production from microalgae via hydrothermal liquefaction technology under subcritical water conditions. Mimet, 153, 108–117.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kiran Kumar, P., Vijaya Krishna, S., Swami Naidu, S., Kavita, V., Bhagawan, D., & Himabindu, V. (2019). Biomass production from microalgae Chlorella grown in sewage, kitchen wastewater using industrial CO2 emissions: comparative study. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2(2), 126–133.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thanomsub, B., Anupunpisit, V., Chanphetch, S., Watcharachaipong, T., Poonkhum, R., & Srisukonth, C. (2002). Effects of ozone treatment on cell growth and ultrastructural changes in bacteria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, 48(4), 193–199.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verma, K., Gupta, D., & Gupta, A. B. (2016). Optimization of ozone disinfection and its effect on trihalomethanes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(3), 3021–3032.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chiu-Yue, L., & Chao-Hui, C. (2006). Fermentative hydrogen production from xylose using anaerobic mixed microflora. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, 832–840.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hisanori, W., & Hidekichi, Y. (2011). Biohydrogen using leachate from an industrial waste landfill as inoculums. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 13, 113–117.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Balasubramani, R., & Karuppan, M. (2018). Influence of sulfuric acid concentration on biohydrogen production from rice mill wastewater using pure and coculture of Enterobacteraerogenes and Citrobacterfreundii. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43(19), 9254–9258.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chang, S., Jianzheng, L., & Feng, L. (2011). Continuous biohydrogen production from diluted molasses in an anaerobic contact reactor. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 5(1), 140–148.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li, J. Z., Li, B. K., Zhu, G. F., Ren, N. Q., Bo, L. X., & He, J. G. (2007). Hydrogen production from diluted molasses by anaerobic hydrogen producing bacteria in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32(15), 3274–3283.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Anubha, K., & Raman, P. (2017). Producing sustained renewable energy and removing organic pollutants from distillery wastewater using consortium of sludge microbes. International Journal of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, 11(6), 520–524.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, B., Wan, W., & Wang, J. (2009). Effect of ammonia concentration on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. Bioresource Technology, 100(3), 1211–1213.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chong, M. L., Sabaratnam, V., Shirai, Y., & Hassan, M. A. (2009). Biohydrogen production from biomass and industrial wastes by dark fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34(8), 3277–3287.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pawinee, S., Pramoch, R., Malinee, L., & Sumaeth, C. (2011). Hydrogen production from alcohol distillery wastewater containing high potassium and sulfate using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39, 12810–12821.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Inara, A. S., Stella, T. L., Marcos, R. S., Marcia Andreia, M. S. V., & Valeria, R. (2017). Landfill leachate enhances fermentative hydrogen production from glucose and sugarcane processing derivatives. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20(2), 777–786.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    O-Thong, S., Prasertsan, P., Intrasungkha, N., Dhamwichukorn, S., & Birkeland, N. (2007). Improvement of biohydrogen production and treatment efficiency on palm oil mill effluent with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41(5), 583–590.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sreethawong, T., Niyamapa, T., Neramitsuk, H., Rangsunvigit, P., Leethochawalit, M., & Chavadej, S. (2010). Hydrogen production from glucose-containing wastewater using an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor: effects of COD loading rate, nitrogen content, and organic acid composition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 160(1), 322–332.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, C. H., & Chang, J. S. (2007). Continuous biohydrogen production from starch with granulated mixed bacterial microflora. Energy and Fuels, 22(1), 93–97.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin, C. Y., Chang, C. C., & Hung, C. H. (2008a). Fermentative hydrogen production from starch using natural mixed cultures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 33(10), 2445–2453.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee, D. Y., Li, Y. Y., & Noike, T. (2009). Continuous H2 production by anaerobic mixed microflora in membrane bioreactor. Bioresource Technology, 100(2), 690–695.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ismail, I., Hassan, M. A., Abdul Rahman, N. A., & Chen, S. S. (2010). Thermophilic biohydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using suspended mixed culture. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34(1), 42–47.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lay, J. J. (2000). Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 68(3), 269–278.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ren, N. Q., Chua, H., Chan, S. Y., Tsang, Y. F., Wang, Y. J., & Sin, N. (2007). Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous-flow acidogenic reactors. Bioresource Technology, 98(9), 1774–1780.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Paolo, D., Estefania, P., Aino-Maija, L., Gavin, C., & Piet, N. L. L. (2018). Temperature control as key factor for optimal biohydrogen production from thermo mechanical pulping wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 137, 214–221.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tugba, K., Kubra, A., Haris, N. A., Cansu, V., Didem, E., Duygu, K., Jale, Y., Guven, O., & Nuri, A. (2018). Determining the effect of trace elements on biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 43, 10666–10677.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Giallo, J., Gaudin, C., Belaich, J., Petitdemange, E., & Caillet-Mangin, F. (1983). Metabolism of glucose and cellobiose by cellulolytic mesophilic Clostridium sp. strain H10. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 45(3), 843–849.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Heeg, K., Pohl, M., Sontag, M., Mumme, J., Klocke, M., & Nettmann, E. (2014). Microbial communities involved in biogas production from wheat straw as the sole substrate within a two-phase solid state anaerobic digestion. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 37(8), 590–600.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Munir, R. I., Schellenberg, J., Henrissat, B., Verbeke, T. J., Sparling, R., & Levin, D. B. (2014). Comparative analysis of carbohydrate active enzymes in Clostridium termitidis CT1112 reveals complex carbohydrate degradation ability. PLoS One, 9(8), e104260.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang, G., Mu, Y., & Yu, H.-Q. (2005). Response surface analysis to evaluate the influence of pH, temperature and substrate concentration on the acidogenesis of sucrose-rich wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 23, 175–184.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yasin, N. H. M., Man, H. C., Yusoff, M. Z. M., & Hassan, M. A. (2011). Microbial characterization of hydrogen-producing bacteria in fermented food waste at different pH values. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(16), 9571–9580.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gazliya, N., Kuldeep, R., Thirugnanasambandam, S., & Vijayanand, S. M. (2018). Mechanistic investigations in ultrasonic pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of landfill leachates. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 6(2), 1690–1701.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vijaya Krishna Saranga
    • 1
  • P. Kiran Kumar
    • 2
  • Kavita Verma
    • 2
  • D. Bhagawan
    • 2
  • V. Himabindu
    • 2
    Email author
  • M. Lakshmi Narasu
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Biotechnology, Institute of Science and TechnologyJawaharlal Nehru Technological University HyderabadHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Alternative Energy Options, Institute of Science and TechnologyJawaharlal Nehru Technological University HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations