GPTMS-Modified Bredigite/PHBV Nanofibrous Bone Scaffolds with Enhanced Mechanical and Biological Properties
- 96 Downloads
Bioceramic nanoparticles with high specific surface area often tend to agglomerate in the polymer matrix, which results in undesirable mechanical properties of the composites and poor cell spreading and attachment. In the present work, bredigite (BR) nanoparticles were modified with an organosilane coupling agent, 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS), to enhance its dispersibility in the polymer matrix. The polyhydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvaletare (PHBV) nanofibrous scaffolds containing either bredigite or GPTMS-modified bredigite (G-BR) nanoparticles were fabricated using electrospinning technique and characterized using scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and tensile strength. Results demonstrated that modification of bredigite was effective in enhancing nanoparticle dispersion in the PHBV matrix. PHBV/G-BR scaffold showed improved mechanical properties compared to PHBV and PHBV/BR, especially at the higher concentration of nanoparticles. In vitro bioactivity assay performed in the simulated body fluid (SBF) indicated that composite PHBV scaffolds were able to induce the formation of apatite deposits after incubation in SBF. From the results of in vitro biological assay, it is concluded that the synergetic effect of BR and GPTMS provided an enhanced hFob cells attachment and proliferation. The developed PHBV/G-BR nanofibrous scaffolds may be considered for application in bone tissue engineering.
KeywordsBredigite nanoparticles PHBV GPTMS Electrospinning Bone tissue engineering
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Kouhi, M., Prabhakaran, M. P., Shamanian, M., Fathi, M., Morshed, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2015). Electrospun PHBV nanofibers containing HA and bredigite nanoparticles: fabrication, characterization and evaluation of mechanical properties and bioactivity. Composites Science and Technology, 121, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Saadatkish, N., Nouri Khorasani, S., Morshed, M., Allafchian, A.-R., Beigi, M.-H., Masoudi Rad, M., Esmaeely Neisiany, R., & Nasr-Esfahani, M. H. (2018). A ternary nanofibrous scaffold potential for central nerve system tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 106(9), 2394–2401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kouhi, M., Fathi, M., Prabhakaran, M. P., Shamanian, M., & Ramakrishna, S. (2018). Enhanced proliferation and mineralization of human fetal osteoblast cells on PHBV-bredigite nanofibrous scaffolds. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(7), 15702–15709.Google Scholar
- 21.Li, Y., & Weng, W. (2008). Surface modification of hydroxyapatite by stearic acid: characterization and in vitro behaviors. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 19(1), 19–25.Google Scholar
- 22.Li, L., Li, G., Jiang, J., Liu, X., Luo, L., & Nan, K. (2012). Electrospun fibrous scaffold of hydroxyapatite/poly (ε-caprolactone) for bone regeneration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 23(2), 547–554.Google Scholar
- 27.Zhang, Q., RongFu, H., Liang-Hong, G. (2009). One-step and high-density protein immobilization on epoxysilane-modified silica nanoparticles. Chinese Science Bulletin, 54.Google Scholar
- 31.Ashuri, M., Moztarzadeh, F., Nezafati, N., Ansari Hamedani, A., & Tahriri, M. (2012). Development of a composite based on hydroxyapatite and magnesium and zinc-containing sol–gel-derived bioactive glass for bone substitute applications. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 32(8), 2330–2339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar