Advertisement

Challenge-based learning: an I-semester for experiential learning in Mechatronics Engineering

  • L. C. Félix-HerránEmail author
  • Adrian E. Rendon-Nava
  • José Manuel Nieto Jalil
Original Paper

Abstract

An Educational Innovation approach denominated, “I-semester,” for Mechatronics Engineering students was designed, implemented and evaluated. The teaching–learning concept applied herein is interactive, experiential, motivates students and encourages their creativity to provide solutions to real-world challenges. Within the frameworks of competency-based education (CBE) and challenge-based learning (CBL), learning experiences were designed consisting of educational modules and challenges focused on developing disciplinary and transversal competencies during an academic semester. The modules provided theoretical and practical knowledge, whereas challenge activities promoted the development of competencies and the generation of creative–solution proposals. This educational research effort included a formal methodology that started with a problem statement and a hypothesis, followed by the method and an experiment that consisted of the I-semester implementation with a sample of students enrolled in the Mechatronic Engineering program at Tecnologico de Monterrey. The methodology, the development of the experiment and the findings through the analysis of gathered data could contribute to educational research focused on CBE–CBL approaches in educational programs for undergraduate engineering students.

Keywords

Challenge-based education Challenge-based learning Educational innovation Evaluation I-semester 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to all the professors who participated in the implementation of the Mechatronic Engineering I-semester at Tecnologico de Monterrey, in Hermosillo, Mexico. The complete team consisted of: Laura Yolanda Quiroz, Carolina Félix, Arturo Gil, Arturo Encinas, Ricardo Quihuis, Sixto Velarde, Enrique Martinez, Adrián Rendón, José Manuel Nieto, and Luis C. Félix-Herrán. This gratitude is extended to Mr. Kurt Gerhard, owner of THERVAL S.A. of C.V., for having participated very actively as the partner-trainer during the whole challenge implementation. Also, special thanks are given to the directors of the School of Engineering and Sciences and to the Curriculum Innovation Department of the Academic Vice-Chancellor of the Tecnologico de Monterrey for their support during all stages of this educational research effort. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial and the technical support of Writing Lab, TecLabs and Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico in the production of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    EDUCAUSE: 7 Things You Should Know About Competency-Based Education. ELI 7 Things You Should Know. http://content.ctcd.edu/downloads/online/files/7thingsyoushouldknow.pdf (2014). Accessed June 2018
  2. 2.
    Beneitone, P., Esquetini, C., González, J., Marty, M., Siufi, G., Wagenaar, R.: Reflexiones y Perspectivas de la Educación Superior en América Latina—Informe Final Proyecto Tuning América Latina 2004–2007. Deusto University and Groningen University. http://tuningacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TuningLAIII_Final-Report_SP.pdf (2007)
  3. 3.
    Everhart, D.: 3 Key Characteristics of Competency Based Learning. BlackBoard Blog. https://blog.blackboard.com/3-key-characteristics-of-competency-based-learning/ (2014). Accessed May 2018
  4. 4.
    Argudin, Y.: Educación Basada en Competencias: nociones y antecedentes. Trillas, Mexico City (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valencia, M., Orona, L., Romo, S., Lozoya, R., Aguilar, A.: Construcción de un robot de telepresencia: aplicando el enfoque multidisciplinario en la educación basada en competencias. Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa, Monterrey, Mexico (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rosas, R., Díaz, E., González, C.: Aprendizaje basado en retos: Sistemas integrados de manufactura, retrospectiva en tres años. Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa, Monterrey, Mexico (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tecnológico de Monterrey: Aprendizaje Basado en Retos. Observatorio de Innovación Educativa del Tecnológico de Monterrey: Edutrends, Monterrey, Mexico (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jou, M., Hung, C.-K., Lai, S.-H.: Application of challenge-based learning approaches in robotics education. Int. J. Technol. Eng. Educ. 7(2), 1–42 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, L.F., Smith, R.S., Smythe, J., Troy, V., Rachel, K.: Challenge-Based Learning: An Approach for Our Time. The New Media Consortium, Austin. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED505102 (2009)
  10. 10.
    Membrillo-Hernández, J., de Ramírez-Cadena, M.J., Caballero-Valdés, C., Ganem-Corvera, R., Bustamante-Bello, R., Benjamín-Ordoñez, J.A., Elizalde-Siller, H.: Challenge based learning: the case of sustainable development engineering at the Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico City Campus. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 8(3), 908–914 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaskins, W.B., Johnson, J., Maltbie, C., Kukreti, A.R.: Changing the learning environment in the college of engineering and applied science using challenge based learning. Int. J. Eng. Pedagogy 5(1), 33–41 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i1.4138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Apple: Challenge Based Learning. A Classroom Guide. https://images.apple.com/education/docs/CBL_Classroom_Guide_Jan_2011.pdf (2010). Accessed April 2018
  13. 13.
    Astengo, J.: Reflexiones sobre los procesos de evaluación en los Talleres Verticales. Congreso Internacional de Innovación Educativa, Monterrey, Mexico (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maya, M., García, M., Britton, E., Acuña, A.: Play lab: creating social value through competency and challenge-based learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Oslo, Norway, pp. 710–715 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ramírez-Mendoza, R., Cruz-Matus, L., Vazquez-Lepe, E., Rios, H., Cabeza-Azpiazu, L., Siller, H., Ahuett-Garza, H., Orta-Castañon, P.: Towards a disruptive active learning engineering education. In: Proceedings IEEE-EDUCON—Global Engineering Education Conference, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, pp. 1251–1258 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tecnológico de Monterrey: Modelo de programas formativos de profesional TEC21. http://miscursos.itesm.mx/bbcswebdav/courses/VPR.T00100.1513.A/curso/contenido/pdf/modelo_prog_form_prof_2015.pdf (2015). Accessed May 2018
  17. 17.
    Carlile, O., Jordan, A.: Approaches to Creativity: A Guide for Teachers. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tornkvist, S.: Creativity: Can it be taught? The case of engineering education. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 23(1), 5–12 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., Airasian, P.: Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Merrill Prentice Hall, Columbus (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruner, J.: Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jonassen, D.H., Peck, K.L., Wilson, B.G.: Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trochim, W., Donnelly, J.: The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Thomson, Mason (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hernández, R., Fernández, C., Baptista, M.: Metodología de la Investigación. McGraw-Hill, Mexico City (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandín, M.P.: Investigación Cualitativa en Educación: Fundamentos y Tradiciones. McGraw-Hill, Madrid (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Denyer, M., Furnémont, J., Poulain, R., Vanloubbeeck.: Las competencias en la educación. Un balance. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Mexico City (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zavala, A., Arnau, L.: 11 Ideas Clave: Cómo Aprender y Enseñar Competencias. Grao, Barcelona (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Desimone, L.M.: Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ. Res. 38, 181–200 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stoll, L., Kools, M.: The school as a learning organisation: a review revisiting and extending a timely concept. J. Prof. Cap. Community 2(1), 2–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meirink, J.A., Imants, J., Meijer, P.C., Verloop, N.: Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Camb. J. Educ. 40, 161–181 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tecnológico de Monterrey: Modelo Educativo TEC21. http://modelotec21.itesm.mx/files/folletomodelotec21.pdf (2016). Accessed May 2018

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and ScienceTecnologico de MonterreyHermosilloMexico

Personalised recommendations