Advertisement

A CAE method for ergonomic assessment of motorcycles’ driver and passenger

  • Filippo CucinottaEmail author
  • Eugenio Guglielmino
  • Felice Sfravara
Original Paper
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

The designers of two-wheeled motorcycles, in the phase of setting up a new project, have the need to carry out ergonomic evaluations on both the pilot and the passenger, from which the optimal comfort and control conditions will arise during the future use of the vehicle. Commonly, the most used method is based on the previous experience of the manufacturer and on the comparison with the choices made by the competitors. This article describes a methodology developed in collaboration with the Italian motorcycle brand Aprilia, owned by Piaggio & C., a company world leader in the sector, designed for the setup phase of new vehicles. The method provides a flexible tool, starting from the Enduro segment and for the different users’ body size (expressed in percentiles). The analysis was done on five commercial Enduro motorcycles from different leading competitor manufacturers. The authors used a mixed method based on numerical and experimental data, detected on virtual models, and on report cards made by professional testers. The results have been showed and discussed.

Keywords

CAE Human factors Anthropometric Motorcycles Ergonomics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Aprilia and Piaggio & C. for providing the information, Piero Soatti for the precious comments and suggestions and Emanuele Fabiano for the irreplaceable help in 3D modeling and image analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Cox, B.L., Mutel, C.L.: The environmental and cost performance of current and future motorcycles. Appl. Energy 212, 1013–1024 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel, R., Mohan, D.: An improved motorcycle helmet design for tropical climates. Appl. Ergon. 24, 427–431 (1993).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90175-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patil, S., Hegde, M.G., Bhattacharjee, S., Rajeshwari, B.C.: Smart motorcycle security system. In: 2016 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering, Technology and Science (ICETETS). pp. 1–4. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gil, G., Savino, G., Piantini, S., Baldanzini, N., Happee, R., Pierini, M.: Are automatic systems the future of motorcycle safety? A novel methodology to prioritize potential safety solutions based on their projected effectiveness. Traffic Inj. Prev. 18, 877–885 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1326594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Rome, L., Ivers, R., Fitzharris, M., Du, W., Haworth, N., Heritier, S., Richardson, D.: Motorcycle protective clothing: protection from injury or just the weather? Accid. Anal. Prev. 43, 1893–1900 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grassi, A., Barbani, D., Baldanzini, N., Barbieri, R., Pierini, M.: Belted safety jacket: a new concept in powered two-wheeler passive safety. Procedia Struct. Integr. 8, 573–593 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2017.12.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel, K.S., Patel, S.S.: Method and apparatus for safety using inflated bags through smart sports clothes. In: 2016 International Conference on Computing Communication Control and automation (ICCUBEA). pp. 1–4. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kar, S., Bhagat, M., Routray, A.: EEG signal analysis for the assessment and quantification of driver’s fatigue. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 13, 297–306 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2010.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robertson, S.A., Minter, A.: A study of some anthropometric characteristics of motorcycle riders. Appl. Ergon. 27, 223–229 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(96)00007-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Velagapudi, S.P., Balasubramanian, V., K, A., Babu, R., Mangaraju, V.: Muscle Fatigue due to Motorcycle Riding. In: Small Engine Technology Conference & Exposition. p. 10 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramasamy, S., Adalarasu, K., Trupti, P.N.: Evaluation of driving-related musculoskeletal disorders in motorbike riders using Quick Exposure Check (QEC). Biomed. Res. An Int. J. Med. Sci. 28(5), 1962–1968 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koyano, M., Kimishima, T., Nakayama, K.: Quantification of static seating comfort of motorcycle seats. JSAE Rev. 24, 99–104 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0389-4304(02)00251-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Velagapudi, S.P., Ray, G.G.: Development of a seating comfort questionnaire for motorcycles. Hum. Factors 59, 1249–1262 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817735929 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma’arof, M.I.N., Omar, A.R., Ahmad, I.N., Jaafar, R., Fauzi, W.M.S.W., Rahim, A.A., Rashid, H., Mahmud, Z.: The Motorcycle Design Parameter Database (MDPD) for different motorcycle models. Procedia Manuf 3, 2581–2588 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations