Advertisement

Alternative elliptic integral solution to the beam deflection equations for the design of compliant mechanisms

  • Alessandro Cammarata
  • Michele Lacagnina
  • Gaetano Sequenzia
Original paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The interactive design for industrial applications is today carried out through methods and tools, with different level of accuracy and simulation times. Consequently, the time necessary for virtual prototyping and analysis phases are often long and may be definitely reduced by means of optimization of tools and methodologies. Compliant mechanisms are increasingly used in the industrial field and the design methods are the subject of several studies, to improve their performance and reliability. This paper provides the reader with reliable numerical expressions to describe flexural beams with large deflections in case of combined end loads and without inflection points. Most of the numerical expressions describing beam deflection already existing in the literature are based on elliptic integrals that take into account strict limitations on the maximum slope angle. Here, we go beyond these limitations at the same time trying to give an order to the most relevant formulations used for determining large deflections of beams subject to combined tip loads. The proposed method provides the same results of the comprehensive elliptic integral solution described in a recent study.

Keywords

Flexural beam Large deflection Compliant mechanisms 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Cammarata, A., Sequenzia, G., Oliveri, S.M., Fatuzzo, G.: Modified chain algorithm to study planar compliant mechanisms. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 10(2), 191–201 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valentini, P.P., Pezzuti, E.: Design and interactive simulation of cross-axis compliant pivot using dynamic splines. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 7(4), 261–269 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bisshopp, K., Drucker, D.: Large deflection of cantilever beams. Q. Appl. Math. 3(3), 272–275 (1945)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hain, K.: Spring mechanisms point balancing, and spring mechanisms continuous balancing. In: Spring Design and Application, pp. 268–275 (1961)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frisch-Fay, R.: Flexible Bars. Butterworths, London (1962)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shoup, T.E., McLarnan, C.W.: On the use of the undulating elastica for the analysis of flexible link mechanisms. J. Eng. Ind. 93(1), 263–267 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shoup, T.E.: On the use of the nodal elastica for the analysis of flexible link devices. J. Eng. Ind. 94(3), 871–875 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su, H.J.: A pseudorigid-body 3r model for determining large deflection of cantilever beams subject to tip loads. J. Mech. Robot. 1(2), 021008 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leishman, L.C., Colton, M.B.: A pseudo-rigid-body model approach for the design of compliant mechanism springs for prescribed force-deflections. In: ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 93–102. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, G., Xiong, B., Huang, X.: Finding the optimal characteristic parameters for 3r pseudo-rigid-body model using an improved particle swarm optimizer. Precis. Eng. 35(3), 505–511 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu, Y.Q., Feng, Z.L., Xu, Q.P.: A pseudo-rigid-body 2r model of flexural beam in compliant mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory 55, 18–33 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, A., Chen, G.: A comprehensive elliptic integral solution to the large deflection problems of thin beams in compliant mechanisms. J. Mech. Robot. 5(2), 021006 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu, Y.Q., Zhou, P., Xu, Q.P.: A new pseudo-rigid-body model of compliant mechanisms considering axial deflection of flexural beams. In: Flores, P., Viadero, F. (eds.) New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol. 24, pp. 851–858. Springer, Cham (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu, Y.Q., Zhu, S.K., Xu, Q.P., Zhou, P.: A novel model of large deflection beams with combined end loads in compliant mechanisms. Precis. Eng. 43, 395–405 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Howell, L.L., Midha, A.: Parametric deflection approximations for end-loaded, large-deflection beams in compliant mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 117(1), 156–165 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Howell, L.L., Midha, A., Norton, T.: Evaluation of equivalent spring stiffness for use in a pseudo-rigid-body model of large-deflection compliant mechanisms. J. Mech. Des. 118(1), 126–131 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saxena, A., Kramer, S.: A simple and accurate method for determining large deflections in compliant mechanisms subjected to end forces and moments. J. Mech. Des. 120(3), 392–400 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyon, S., Howell, L., Roach, G.: Modeling flexible segments with force and moment end loads via the pseudo-rigid-body model. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, FL, Nov, pp. 5–10 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Howell, L.L.: Compliant Mechanisms. Wiley, Hoboken (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kimball, C., Tsai, L.W.: Modeling of flexural beams subjected to arbitrary end loads. J. Mech. Des. 124(2), 223–235 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banerjee, A., Bhattacharya, B., Mallik, A.: Large deflection of cantilever beams with geometric non-linearity: analytical and numerical approaches. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 43(5), 366–376 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Byrd, P.F., Friedman, M.D.: Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Physicists, vol. 67. Springer, Berlin (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: Dynamic analysis of planar rigid multibody systems modeled using natural absolute coordinates. Appl. Comput. Mech. 12(1), 73–110 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pappalardo, C.M., Guida, D.: On the lagrange multipliers of the intrinsic constraint equations of rigid multibody mechanical systems. Arch. Appl. Mech. 88(3), 419–451 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sequenzia, G., Fatuzzo, G., Oliveri, S., Barbagallo, R.: Interactive re-design of a novel variable geometry bicycle saddle to prevent neurological pathologies. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 10(2), 165–172 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Cammarata
    • 1
  • Michele Lacagnina
    • 2
  • Gaetano Sequenzia
    • 2
  1. 1.DICARUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  2. 2.DIEEIUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations