Effect of particle shape on the wear and friction behavior of particle-reinforced epoxy coatings

  • Kenan CinarEmail author
  • S. Ozmen Eruslu
  • I. Savas Dalmis
  • Ibrahim Guven


Epoxy coatings are increasingly becoming popular choices as barriers against acids and alkali for protection of concrete and metal products. In applications, metal containers are often coated with epoxy-based coatings to prevent rusting and corrosion. In this study, an experimental examination was carried out to investigate the effect of particle shape and size on the friction and wear behavior of epoxy coatings. Friction and wear experiments were conducted using a pin-on-disk tribometer. Epoxy resin was filled with four different shapes of glass particles (spherical, flake, rod, and irregular shape) and varying particle sizes. Fillers were settled down and filler surface area fraction through thickness was characterized using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). The wear mechanisms such as matrix wear, matrix cracking, particle fracture, particle debonding, and pullout and debris formation were studied using scanning electron microscopy. According to observations, it was found that particle shape has an effect on the wear characteristic. Particle fracture and particle pullout mainly dominated the wear in the samples of flake- and rod-shaped fillers, perpendicular matrix cracks occurred in the samples of spherical fillers, large debonding at the particle–matrix interface without particle pullout occurred in the samples of large irregular-shaped fillers (75–150 µm), and matrix cracks dominated the wear as the size of irregular-shaped fillers decreased to 50–75 µm. Further, it was found that friction coefficient depends on the shape of the particle. The samples with spherical- and irregular-shaped fillers had higher friction coefficient as compared to the samples with flake and rod fillers.


Friction Sliding wear Particle-reinforced coating X-ray microtomography Particle-reinforced composites 



  1. 1.
    Wolfgang Grellmann, SS, Polymer Testing. Hanser, Munich (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xing, XS, Li, RY, “Wear Behaviour of Epoxy Matrix Composites Filled with Uniform Sized Sub-micron Spherical Silica Particles.” Wear, 256 21–26 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Durand, JM, Vardavoulias, M, Jeandin, M, “Role of Reinforcing Ceramic Particles in the Wear Behaviour of Polymer-Based Model Composites.” Wear, 181 833–839 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanchanomai, C, Noraphaiphipaksa, N, Mutoh, Y, “Wear Characteristic of Epoxy Resin Filled with Crushed-Silica Particles.” Compos. B Eng., 42 1446–1452 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Basava, T, Harirao, AN, “Investigation of Dry Wear Behaviour of Silicon-Eglass-Epoxy Composite Material.” Silicon, 9 153–158 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Basavarajappa, S, Ellangovan, S, Arun, KV, “Studies on Dry Sliding Wear Behaviour of Graphite Filled Glass-Epoxy Composites.” Mater. Des., 30 2670–2675 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suresha, B, Siddaramaiah, Kishore, Seetharamu, S, Kumaran, PS, “Investigations on the Influence of Graphite Filler on Dry Sliding Wear and Abrasive Wear Behaviour of Carbon Fabric Reinforced Epoxy Composites.” Wear, 267 1405–1414 (2009). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sahin, Y, De Baets, B, “Friction and Wear Behaviour of Carbon Fabric-Reinforced Epoxy Composites.” JOM, 69 (12) 2443–2447 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sarkar, P, Modak, N, Sahoo, P, “Effect of Aluminum Filler on Friction and Wear Characteristics of Glass Epoxy Composites.” Silicon, 10 715–723 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhieb, H, Buijnsters, JG, Eddoumy, F, Vazquez, L, Celis, JP, “Surface and Sub-surface Degradation of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Under Dry and Wet Reciprocating Sliding.” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., 55 53–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dhieb, H, Buijnsters, JG, Eddoumy, F, Celis, JP, “Surface Damage of Unidirectional Carbon Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites Under Reciprocating Sliding in Ambient Air.” Compos. Sci. Technol., 71 1769–1776 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dhieb, H, Tabatabaei, SA, Gordeev, G, Buijnsters, JG, Celis, JP, “Numerical Modelling and Experimental Validation of Debonding and Heat Transfer of Carbon Reinforced Composite Under Reciprocating Sliding.” Compos. B Eng., 114 432–444 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holmberg, K, Laukkanen, A, Turunen, E, Laitinen, T, “Wear Resistance Optimization of Composite Coatings by Computational Microstructural Modelling.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 247 1–13 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vite-Torres, M, Martínez-Arriero, Z, Gallardo-Hernández, EA, Sedano-de la Rosa, C, Castillo-Sánchez, MD, Lasorsa, C, “Performance of the Silicon Carbide Coating Under Erosion Wear by Erosion by Solid Particles.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 14 863–868 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cinar, K, Guven, I, “Micro-computed Tomography as a Tool to Investigate the Deformation Behavior of Particulate-Filled Composite Materials.” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 140 1–18 (2018)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guven, I, Cinar, K, “Micromechanical Modeling of Particulate-Filled Composites Using Micro-CT to Create Representative Volume Elements.” Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des., (2018). Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, LK, Wang, MJJ, “Image Thresholding by Minimizing the Measures of Fuzziness.” Pattern Recognit., 28 (1) 41–51 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kushvala, V, Tippur, H, “Effect of Filler Shape, Volume Fraction and Loading Rate on Dynamic Fracture Behaviour of Glass-filled Epoxy.” Compos. B Eng., 64 126–137 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNamik Kemal UniversityTekirdağTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Nuclear EngineeringVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations