Advertisement

Improving the wettability and antiprotein adsorption property of PDMS by swelling–deswelling approach

  • Xue-Ke Xia
  • Xiao-Hong Wang
  • Wei Zhang
  • Xue-Lian Han
  • Ping Chen
  • Yong JiangEmail author
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

In order to improve the wettability and antiprotein adsorption property of PDMS, heptamethyltrisiloxane (a well-known superspreader) was coated onto the PDMS substrates by a swelling–deswelling process. PDMS films were first immersed in heptamethyltrisiloxane solution mixtures to coat heptamethyltrisiloxane onto PDMS. During the deswelling process, the hydrophobic siloxane group of the superspreader heptamethyltrisiloxane was trapped in the PDMS matrix, while the hydrophilic group EO was exposed to the surface. In this manner, heptamethyltrisiloxane was finally coated on the PDMS surface via swelling–deswelling process. Contact angle measurements, optical property analyses, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy were used to confirm that durable hydrophilic and transparent PDMS surfaces were successfully obtained. The PDMS surface wettability could be adjusted by tuning the solubility parameters of the solution mixture. Additionally, antiprotein adsorption property was investigated and the result indicated the heptamethyltrisiloxane was tethered onto the PDMS surface. The swelling–deswelling method can be applied for the modification of other crosslinked polymers to obtain antifouling surfaces and functional materials for biomedical applications.

Graphical abstract

A superspreading surfactant (Silwet-L77) was coated onto the PDMS surface by the swelling–deswelling process, to improve its hydrophilicity and antiprotein adsorption properties.

Keywords

Heptamethyltrisiloxane Surfactant modification Polydimethylsiloxane Swelling–deswelling process 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with Grant Number 21174029, the Industry Academia Cooperation Innovation Fund of Jiangsu Province with grant number BY2014127-07, the Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities with Grant Number 2242016K41020.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Martin, S, Bhushan, B, “Transparent, Wear-Resistant, Superhydrophobic and Superoleophobic Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) Surfaces.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 488 118–126 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fuard, D, Tzvetkova-Chevolleau, T, Decossas, S, Tracqui, P, Schiavone, P, “Optimization of Poly-di-Methyl-Siloxane (PDMS) Substrates for Studying Cellular Adhesion and Motility.” Microelectron. Eng., 85 (5–6) 1289–1293 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Firpo, G, Angeli, E, Repetto, L, Valbusa, U, “Permeability Thickness Dependence of Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 481 1–8 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Luensmann, D, Jones, L, “Albumin Adsorption to Contact Lens Materials: A Review.” Contact Lens Anterior Eye J. Br. Contact Lens Assoc., 31 (4) 179–187 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luensmann, D, Jones, L, “Protein Deposition on Contact Lenses: The Past, the Present, and the Future.” Contact Lens Anterior Eye J. Br. Contact Lens Assoc., 35 (2) 53–64 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nichols, JJ, “Deposition on Silicone Hydrogel Lenses.” Eye Contact Lens, 39 (1) 20–23 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou, J, Ellis, AV, Voelcker, NH, “Recent Developments in PDMS Surface Modification for Microfluidic Devices.” Electrophoresis, 31 (1) 2–16 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhuang, X, Chen, X, Su, Y, Luo, J, Feng, S, Zhou, H, Wan, Y, “Surface Modification of Silicalite-1 with Alkoxysilanes to Improve the Performance of PDMS/Silicalite-1 Pervaporation Membranes: Preparation, Characterization and Modeling.” J. Membr. Sci., 499 386–395 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bodas, D, Khan-Malek, C, “Formation of More Stable Hydrophilic Surfaces of PDMS by Plasma and Chemical Treatments.” Microelectron. Eng., 83 (4–9) 1277–1279 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, HT, Jeong, OC, “PDMS Surface Modification Using Atmospheric Pressure Plasma.” Microelectron. Eng., 88 (8) 2281–2285 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berdichevsky, Y, Khandurina, J, Guttman, A, Lo, YH, “UV/Ozone Modification of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) Microfluidic Channels.” Sens. Actuators B Chem., 97 (2–3) 402–408 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chuah, YJ, Kuddannaya, S, Lee, MH, Zhang, Y, Kang, Y, “The Effects of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) Surface Silanization on the Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate.” Biomater. Sci., 3 (2) 383–390 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eddington, DT, Puccinelli, JP, Beebe, DJ, “Thermal Aging and Reduced Hydrophobic Recovery of Polydimethylsiloxane.” Sens. Actuators B Chem., 114 (1) 170–172 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keefe, AJ, Brault, ND, Jiang, S, “Suppressing Surface Reconstruction of Superhydrophobic PDMS Using a Superhydrophilic Zwitterionic Polymer.” Biomacromolecules, 13 (5) 1683–1687 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vlachopoulou, ME, Petrou, PS, Kakabakos, SE, Tserepi, A, Beltsios, K, Gogolides, E, “Effect of Surface Nanostructuring of PDMS on Wetting Properties, Hydrophobic Recovery and Protein Adsorption.” Microelectron. Eng., 86 (4–6) 1321–1324 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esteban-Tejeda, L, Duff, T, Ciapetti, G, Daniela Angione, M, Myles, A, Vasconcelos, JM, Scanlan, EM, Colavita, PE, “Stable Hydrophilic Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) Via Glycan Surface Functionalization.” Polymer, 106 1–7 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xu, Y, Jiang, H, Wang, E, “Ionic Liquid-Assisted PDMS Microchannel Modification for Efficiently Resolving Fluorescent Dye and Protein Adsorption.” Electrophoresis, 28 (24) 4597–4605 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seo, JH, Ishihara, K, “Diffusion-Induced Hydrophilic Conversion of Polydimethylsiloxane/Block-Type Phospholipid Polymer Hybrid Substrate for Temporal Cell-Adhesive Surface.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8 (33) 21839–21846 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garcia, CD, Dressen, BM, Henderson, A, Henry, CS, “Comparison of Surfactants for Dynamic Surface Modification of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) Microchips.” Electrophoresis, 26 (3) 703–709 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, J, Khodakov, DA, Ellis, AV, Voelcker, NH, “Surface Modification for PDMS-Based Microfluidic Devices.” Electrophoresis, 33 (1) 89–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yao, M, Fang, J, “Hydrophilic PEO-PDMS for Microfluidic Applications.” J. Micromech. Microeng., 22 (2) 025012 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seo, J, Lee, LP, “Effects on Wettability by Surfactant Accumulation/Depletion in Bulk Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).” Sens. Actuators B Chem., 119 (1) 192–198 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, JN, Park, C, Whitesides, GM, “Solvent Compatibility of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane)-Based Microfluidic Devices.” Anal. Chem., 75 6544–6554 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yu, K, Han, Y, “A Stable PEO-Tethered PDMS Surface Having Controllable Wetting Property by a Swelling–Deswelling Process.” Soft Matter, 2 (8) 705–709 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ranjini, M, Cox, CD, Melissa, MSH, Grunlan, A, “Protein-Resistant Silicones: Incorporation of Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Via Siloxane Tethers.” Biomacromolecules, 8 3244–3252 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rosen, MJ, Wu, Y, “Superspreading of Trisiloxane Surfactant Mixtures on Hydrophobic Surfaces. 1. Interfacial Adsorption of Aqueous Trisiloxane Surfactant N-Alkyl Pyrrolidinone Mixtures on Polyethylene.” Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids, 17 7296–7305 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Venzmer, J, “Superspreading—20 Years of Physicochemical Research.” Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 16 (4) 335–343 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ben Soltane, H, Roizard, D, Favre, E, “Effect of Pressure on the Swelling and Fluxes of Dense PDMS Membranes in Nanofiltration: An Experimental Study.” J. Membr. Sci., 435 110–119 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim, BY, Hong, LY, Chung, YM, Kim, DP, Lee, CS, “Solvent-Resistant PDMS Microfluidic Devices with Hybrid Inorganic/Organic Polymer Coatings.” Adv. Funct. Mater., 19 (23) 3796–3803 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bozdogan, AE, “A Method for Determination of Thermodynamics and Solubility Parameters of Polymers in Dilute Solutions from Critical Volume Fractions.” Polymer, 44 (20) 6427–6430 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koh, KS, Chin, J, Chia, J, Chiang, CL, “Quantitative Studies on PDMS-PDMS Interface Bonding with Piranha Solution and its Swelling Effect.” Micromachines, 3 (4) 427–441 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Adamiak, W, Kałuża, D, Jönsson-Niedziolka, M, “Compatibility of Organic Solvents for Electrochemical Measurements in PDMS-Based Microfluidic Devices.” Microfluid. Nanofluid., 20 (9) 127 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-016-1792-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rumens, CV, Ziai, MA, Belsey, KE, Batchelor, JC, Holder, SJ, “Swelling of PDMS Networks in Solvent Vapours; Applications for Passive RFID Wireless Sensors.” J. Mater. Chem. C, 3 (39) 10091–10098 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shen, Y, Koplik, J, Maldarelli, C, Tomassone, MS, “Molecular Dynamics Study of the Influence of Surfactant Structure on Surfactant-Facilitated Spreading of Droplets on Solid Surfaces.” J. Surf. Colloids, 21 12160–12170 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deng, X, Korogiannaki, M, Rastegari, B, Zhang, J, Chen, M, Fu, Q, Sheardown, H, Filipe, CD, Hoare, T, ““Click” Chemistry-Tethered Hyaluronic Acid-Based Contact Lens Coatings Improve Lens Wettability and Lower Protein Adsorption.” Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8 (34) 22064–22073 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Su, X, Shi, B, “Effect of Silane Coupling Agents with Different Non-hydrolytic Groups on Tensile Modulus of Composite PDMS Crosslinked Membranes.” React. Funct. Polym., 98 1–8 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Haiye, Wang, Chengfeng, Zhang, Jianxiu, Wang, Xiaofeng, Feng, Chunju, He, “Dual-Mode Antifouling Ability of Thiol-Ene Amphiphilic Conetworks: Minimally Adhesive Coatings Via the Surface Zwitterionization.” ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 4 3803–3811 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chen, H, Song, W, Zhou, F, Wu, Z, Huang, H, Zhang, J, Lin, Q, Yang, B, “The Effect of Surface Microtopography of Poly(Dimethylsiloxane) on Protein Adsorption, Platelet and Cell Adhesion.” Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 71 275–281 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xue-Ke Xia
    • 1
  • Xiao-Hong Wang
    • 1
  • Wei Zhang
    • 1
  • Xue-Lian Han
    • 2
  • Ping Chen
    • 2
  • Yong Jiang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu Province Hi-Tech Key Laboratory for Biomedical ResearchSoutheast UniversityNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Hydron Contact Lens Co., LtdDanyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations