Methyltrichlorosilane functionalized silica nanoparticles-treated superhydrophobic cotton for oil–water separation

  • Love Dashairya
  • Dibya Darshan Barik
  • Partha SahaEmail author


Water pollution due to oil spills has become a significant concern in recent times for the marine ecosystem. The use of oleophilic/hydrophobic sorbents for oil–water separation has gained a lot of attention as an economical and environment-friendly solution. Herein, we developed a superhydrophobic/superoleophilic cotton by silica nanoparticles (~ 800 nm) treatment followed by surface functionalization with methyltrichlorosilane (MTCS). X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy studies reveal that the formation of pseudo-amorphous SiO2 NPs and a C–Si–O coverage on cotton fiber render it superhydrophobic with increased surface roughness. The MTCS/SiO2-treated cotton exhibited contact angles of ~ 173 ± 2° and 0° on the water–cotton and oil–cotton interface, respectively. Moreover, the MTCS/SiO2-treated cotton demonstrated superhydrophobicity over the entire pH range, with excellent absorption capacities for various oil–water mixtures ranging from ~ 30 to 40 times its weight.


Superhydrophobicity Absorption capacity Contact angle Methyltrichlorosilane 



Dr. Partha Saha gratefully acknowledges the financial support received from Department of Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Research Board (DST-SERB) (Grant Number ECR/2016/000959).

Supplementary material

11998_2018_177_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4459 kb)


  1. 1.
    Gundlach, ER, Hayes, MO, “Vulnerability of Coastal Environments to Oil Spill Impacts.” Marine Tech. Soc. J., 12 (4) 18–27 (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saha, P, Dashairya, L, “Reduced Graphene Oxide Modified Melamine Formaldehyde (rGO@ MF) Superhydrophobic Sponge for Efficient Oil–Water Separation.” J. Porous Mater., 25 (5) 1475–1488 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu, Q, Chu, Y, Wang, Z, Chen, N, Lin, L, Liu, F, Pan, Q, “Robust Superhydrophobic Polyurethane Sponge as a Highly Reusable Oil-Absorption Material.” J. Mater. Chem. A, 1 (17) 5386–5393 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeyasubramanian, K, Hikku, G, Preethi, A, Benitha, V, Selvakumar, N, “Fabrication of Water Repellent Cotton Fabric by Coating Nano Particle Impregnated Hydrophobic Additives and Its Characterization.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 37 180–189 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yin, F, Hayworth, JS, Clement, TP, “A Tale of Two Recent Spills—Comparison of 2014 Galveston Bay and 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Residues.” PLoS One, 10 (2) e0118098 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dashairya, L, Rout, M, Saha, P, “Reduced Graphene Oxide-Coated Cotton as an Efficient Absorbent in Oil–Water Separation.” Adv. Comput. Hybrid Mater., 1 (1) 135–148 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shang, Q, Liu, C, Zhou, Y, “One-Pot Fabrication of Robust Hydrophobia and Superoleophilic Cotton Fabrics for Effective Oil–Water Separation.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 15 (1) 65–75 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, C-F, Huang, H-C, Chen, L-T, “Protonated Melamine Sponge for Effective Oil/Water Separation.” Sci. Rep., 5 14294 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu, F, Ma, M, Zang, D, Gao, Z, Wang, C, “Fabrication of Superhydrophobic/Superoleophilic Cotton for Application in the Field of Water/Oil Separation.” Carbohydr. Poly., 103 480–487 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, B, Lei, B, Tang, Y, Xiang, D, Li, H, Ma, Q, Zhao, C, Li, Y, “Facile Fabrication of Robust Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabrics Modified by Polysiloxane Nanowires for Oil/Water Separation.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 15 (3) 611–621 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kwon, G, Kota, AK, Li, Y, Sohani, A, Mabry, JM, Tuteja, A, “On-Demand Separation of Oil–Water Mixtures.” Adv. Mater., 24 (27) 3666–3671 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeevahan, J, Chandrasekaran, M, Joseph, GB, Durairaj, R, Mageshwaran, G, “Superhydrophobic Surfaces: A Review on Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 15 231–250 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xue, C-H, Jia, S-T, Chen, H-Z, Wang, M, “Superhydrophobic Cotton Fabrics Prepared by Sol–Gel Coating of TiO2 and Surface Hydrophobization.” Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 9 (3) 035001 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, H-C, Pi, J-K, Liao, K-J, Huang, H, Wu, Q-Y, Huang, X-J, Xu, Z-K, “Silica-Decorated Polypropylene Microfiltration Membranes with a Mussel-Inspired Intermediate Layer for Oil-in-Water Emulsion Separation.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (15) 12566–12572 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zulfiqar, U, Hussain, SZ, Awais, M, Khan, MMJ, Hussain, I, Husain, SW, Subhani, T, “In-Situ Synthesis of Bi-Modal Hydrophobic Silica Nanoparticles for Oil–Water Separation.” Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 508 301–308 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao, Q, Zhu, Q, Guo, Y, Yang, CQ, “Formation of Highly Hydrophobic Surfaces on Cotton and Polyester Fabrics Using Silica Sol Nanoparticles and Nonfluorinated Alkylsilane.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48 (22) 9797–9803 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huang, J, Li, S, Ge, M, Wang, L, Xing, T, Chen, G, Liu, X, Al-Deyab, SS, Zhang, K, Chen, T, “Robust Superhydrophobic TiO2@ Fabrics for UV Shielding, Self-Cleaning and Oil–Water Separation.” J. Mater. Chem. A, 3 (6) 2825–2832 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahltig, B, Böttcher, H, “Modified Silica Sol Coatings for Water-Repellent Textiles.” J. Sol–Gel Sci. Technol., 27 (1) 43–52 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roe, B, Kotek, R, Zhang, X, “Durable Hydrophobic Cotton Surfaces Prepared Using Silica Nanoparticles and Multifunctional Silanes.” J. Text. Inst., 103 (4) 385–393 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Arkles, B, Hydrophobicity, Hydrophilicity and Silane Surface Modification. Gelest Inc, Morris (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen, N, Pan, Q, “Versatile Fabrication of Ultralight Magnetic Foams and Application for Oil–Water Separation.” ACS Nano, 7 (8) 6875–6883 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khoo, HS, Tseng, F-G, “Engineering the 3D Architecture and Hydrophobicity of Methyltrichlorosilane Nanostructures.” Nanotechnology, 19 (34) 345603 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan, Y, Shi, K, Peng, C, Wang, W, Liu, Z, Ji, X, “Evaluation of Hydrophobic Polyvinyl-Alcohol Formaldehyde Sponges as Absorbents for Oil Spill.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (11) 8651–8659 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng, H, Wang, H, Wu, J, Meng, G, Wang, Y, Shi, Y, Liu, Z, Guo, X, “Preparation of Superhydrophobic Magnetic Cellulose Sponge for Removing Oil from Water.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 55 (3) 832–838 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmutz, A, Jenny, T, Ryser, U, “A Caffeoyl-Fatty Acid-Glycerol Ester from Wax Associated with Green Cotton Fibre Suberin.” Phytochemistry, 36 (6) 1343–1346 (1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang, J, Zheng, Y, Wang, A, “Superhydrophobic Kapok Fiber Oil-Absorbent: Preparation and High Oil Absorbency.” Chem. Eng. J., 213 1–7 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bae, GY, Min, BG, Jeong, YG, Lee, SC, Jang, JH, Koo, GH, “Superhydrophobicity of Cotton Fabrics Treated with Silica Nanoparticles and Water-Repellent Agent.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 337 (1) 170–175 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, S, Liu, C, Liu, G, Zhang, M, Li, J, Wang, C, “Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Wood Surface by a Sol-Gel Process.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 258 (2) 806–810 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lim, T-T, Huang, X, “Evaluation of Kapok (Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertn.) as a Natural Hollow Hydrophobic–Oleophilic Fibrous Sorbent for Oil Spill Cleanup.” Chemosphere, 66 (5) 955–963 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vince, J, Orel, B, Vilčnik, A, Fir, M, Šurca Vuk, A, Jovanovski, V, Simoncic, B, “Structural and Water-Repellent Properties of a Urea/Poly (dimethylsiloxane) Sol–Gel Hybrid and Its Bonding to Cotton Fabric.” Langmuir, 22 (15) 6489–6497 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li, S, Zhang, S, Wang, X, “Fabrication of Superhydrophobic Cellulose-Based Materials Through a Solution-Immersion Process.” Langmuir, 24 (10) 5585–5590 (2008)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shokri, B, Firouzjah, MA, Hosseini, S, “FTIR Analysis of Silicon Dioxide Thin Film Deposited By Metal Organic-Based PECVD.” Proc. Proceedings of 19th International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry Society, Bochum, Germany 2009Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hoai, NT, Sang, NN, Hoang, TD, “Thermal Reduction of Graphene-Oxide-Coated Cotton for Oil and Organic Solvent Removal.” Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 216 10–15 (2017)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gholami, T, Salavati-Niasari, M, Bazarganipour, M, Noori, E, “Synthesis and Characterization of Spherical Silica Nanoparticles by Modified Stöber Process Assisted by Organic Ligand.” Superlattice Micro., 61 33–41 (2013)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guo, Q, Yang, G, Huang, D, Cao, W, Ge, L, Li, L, “Synthesis and Characterization of Spherical Silica Nanoparticles by Modified Stöber Process Assisted by Slow-Hydrolysis Catalyst.” Colloid Poly. Sci., 296 (2) 379–384 (2018)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Musić, S, Filipović-Vinceković, N, Sekovanić, L, “Precipitation of Amorphous SiO2 Particles and Their Properties.” Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 28 (1) 89–94 (2011)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nallathambi, G, Ramachandran, T, Rajendran, V, Palanivelu, R, “Effect of Silica Nanoparticles and BTCA on Physical Properties of Cotton Fabrics.” Mater. Res., 14 (4) 552–559 (2011)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zheng, Q, Cai, Z, Gong, S, “Green Synthesis of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)–Cellulose Nanofibril (CNF) Hybrid Aerogels and Their Use as Superabsorbents.” J. Mater. Chem. A, 2 (9) 3110–3118 (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Duan, B, Gao, H, He, M, Zhang, L, “Hydrophobic Modification on Surface of Chitin Sponges for Highly Effective Separation of Oil.” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (22) 19933–19942 (2014)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nakajima, A, Hashimoto, K, Watanabe, T, “Recent Studies on Super-Hydrophobic Films.” Monatshefte für Chemie/Chemical Monthly, 132 (1) 31–41 (2001)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hauner, IM, Deblais, A, Beattie, JK, Kellay, H, Bonn, D, “The Dynamic Surface Tension of Water.” J. Phy. Chem. Lett., 8 (7) 1599–1603 (2017)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu, F, Wang, S, Zhang, M, Ma, M, Wang, C, Li, J, “Improvement of Mechanical Robustness of the Superhydrophobic Wood Surface by Coating PVA/SiO2 Composite Polymer.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 280 686–692 (2013)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ge, B, Zhang, Z, Zhu, X, Men, X, Zhou, X, Xue, Q, “A Graphene Coated Cotton for Oil/Water Separation.” Compo. Sci. Technol., 102 100–105 (2014)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sun, H, Zhu, Z, Liang, W, Yang, B, Qin, X, Zhao, X, Pei, C, La, P, Li, A, “Reduced Graphene Oxide-Coated Cottons for Selective Absorption of Organic Solvents and Oils from Water.” RSC Adv., 4 (58) 30587–30591 (2014)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zhu, T, Li, S, Huang, J, Mihailiasa, M, Lai, Y, “Rational Design of Multi-Layered Superhydrophobic Coating on Cotton Fabrics for UV Shielding, Self-Cleaning and Oil–Water Separation.” Mater. Des., 134 342–351 (2017)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Deschamps, G, Caruel, H, Borredon, M-E, Bonnin, C, Vignoles, C, “Oil Removal from Water by Selective Sorption on Hydrophobic Cotton Fibers. 1. Study of Sorption Properties and Comparison with Other Cotton Fiber-Based Sorbents.” Env. Sci. Tech., 37 (5) 1013–1015 (2003)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lee, JH, Kim, DH, Kim, YD, “High-Performance, Recyclable and Superhydrophobic Oil Absorbents Consisting of Cotton with a Polydimethylsiloxane Shell.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 35 140–145 (2016)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lu, Y, Yuan, W, “Superhydrophobic Three-Dimensional Porous Ethyl Cellulose Absorbent with Micro/Nano-Scale Hierarchical Structures for Highly Efficient Removal of Oily Contaminants from Water.” Carbohydr. Poly., 191 86–94 (2018)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gui, X, Li, H, Wang, K, Wei, J, Jia, Y, Li, Z, Fan, L, Cao, A, Zhu, H, Wu, D, “Recyclable Carbon Nanotube Sponges for Oil Absorption.” Acta Mater., 59 (12) 4798–4804 (2011)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hu, H, Zhao, Z, Gogotsi, Y, Qiu, J, “Compressible carbon nanotube–graphene hybrid aerogels with superhydrophobicity and superoleophilicity for oil sorption.” Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett., 1 (3) 214–220 (2014)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Park, JH, Aluru, N, “Temperature-Dependent Wettability on a Titanium Dioxide Surface.” Mol. Simu., 35 (1–2) 31–37 (2009)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yaneva, Z, Koumanova, B, “Comparative Modelling of Mono-and Dinitrophenols Sorption on Yellow Bentonite from Aqueous Solutions.” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 293 (2) 303–311 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ceramic EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologyRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations