Advertisement

Surface modification of polyarylene sulfide sulfone membrane by coating with polydopamine

  • Chen Xiong
  • Sujiao Cao
  • Yue Wang
  • Xiaojun WangEmail author
  • Shengru Long
  • Gang Zhang
  • Jie YangEmail author
Review
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Polyarylene sulfide sulfone membrane was surface-modified by coating with polydopamine to improve its hydrophilic property and permeation performance, and owing to its favorable solvent resistance, it could be applied in the filtration of organic wastewater. The change in the morphology and chemical properties was ascertained by SEM and FTIR, which suggested that polydopamine was adsorbed at the polyarylene sulfide sulfone (PASS) membrane. It was confirmed that the hydrophilic property of PASS membrane was enhanced through water contact angle measurement. Moreover, it possessed an improved flux compared with the pristine PASS membrane even after high temperature and organic solvent treatment.

Keywords

Surface modification Polydopamine Hydrophilic Solvent resistance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China projects (51573103, 21274094, and 21304060) and the National Key Laboratory Project (oic-201701006).

References

  1. 1.
    Darnoko, D, Cheryan, M, “Carotenoids from Red Palm Methyl Esters by Nanofiltration.” J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 83 (4) 365–370 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kondal Reddy, K, Kawakatsu, T, Snape, JB, et al., “Membrane Concentration and Separation of l-Aspartic Acid and l-Phenylalanine Derivatives in Organic Solvents.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 31 (8) 1161–1178 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ebert, K, Petrus, CF, “Solvent Resistant Nano-Filtration Membranes in Edible Oil Processing.” Membr. Technol., 1999 (107) 5–8 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panda, AB, Laha, P, Harish, K, et al., “Study of Bactericidal Efficiency of Magnetron Sputtered TiO2 Films Deposited at Varying Oxygen Partial Pressure.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 205 (5) 1611–1617 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yuan, B, Cao, M, Sun, H, et al., “Preparation of a Polyimide Nanofiltration Membrane for Lubricant Solvent Recovery.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 131 (15) 264–272 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scarpello, JT, Nair, D, Santos, LMFD, et al., “The Separation of Homogeneous Organometallic Catalysts Using Solvent Resistant Nanofiltration.” J. Membr. Sci., 203 (1) 71–85 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Firman, LR, Ochoa, NA, Marchese, J, et al., “Deacidification and Solvent Recovery of Soybean Oil by Nanofiltration Membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 431 (6) 187–196 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agenson, KO, Urase, T, “Change in Membrane Performance Due to Organic Fouling in Nanofiltration (NF)/Reverse Osmosis (RO) Applications.” Sep. Purif. Technol., 55 (2) 147–156 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shafi, HZ, Matin, A, Khan, Z, et al., “Surface Modification of Reverse Osmosis Membranes with Zwitterionic Coatings: A Potential Strategy for Control of Biofouling.” Surf. Coat. Technol., 279 171–179 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braeken, L, Boussu, K, Bruggen, BVD, et al., “Modeling of the Adsorption of Organic Compounds on Polymeric Nanofiltration Membranes in Solutions Containing Two Compounds.” ChemPhysChem, 6 (8) 1606 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhu, LP, Zhu, BK, Li, X, et al., “Corona-Induced Graft Polymerization for Surface Modification of Porous Polyethersulfone Membranes.” Appl. Surf. Sci., 253 (14) 6052–6059 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao, X, Chen, F, Wei, Q, et al., “Surface Modification of Polyester Nonwoven Fabrics by Al2O3 Sol–Gel Coating.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 6 (4) 537 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang, MS, Chun, B, Kim, SS, “Surface Modification of Polypropylene Membrane by Low-Temperature Plasma Treatment.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81 (6) 1555–1566 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, J, Xie, J, Ling, L, et al., “Surface Modification of Nanosilica with 3-Mercaptopropyl Trimethoxysilane and Investigation of Its Effect on the Properties of UV Curable Coatings.” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 10 (6) 849–857 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, YQ, Wang, T, Su, YL, et al., “Protein-Adsorption-Resistance and Permeation Property of Polyethersulfone and Soybean Phosphatidylcholine Blend Ultrafiltration Membranes.” J. Membr. Sci., 270 (1–2) 108–114 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shi, JL, Fang, LF, Zhang, H, et al., “Influences of Extractant on the Hydrophilicity and Performances of HDPE/PE-b-PEG Blend Membranes Prepared via Thermally Induced Phase Separation (TIPS) Process.” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 130 (4) 2680–2687 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, HC, Luo, J, Lv, Y, et al., “Surface Engineering of Polymer Membranes via Mussel-Inspired Chemistry.” J. Membr. Sci., 483 42–59 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xi, ZY, Xu, YY, Zhu, LP, et al., “A Facile Method of Surface Modification for Hydrophobic Polymer Membranes Based on the Adhesive Behavior of Poly(DOPA) and Poly(Dopamine).” J. Membr. Sci., 327 (1–2) 244–253 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Silverman, HG, Roberto, FF, “Understanding Marine Mussel Adhesion.” Mar. Biotechnol., 9 (6) 661–681 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burzio, LA, Waite, JH, “Crosslinking in Adhesive Quinoproteins: Studies with Model Decapeptides.” Biochemistry, 39 (36) 11147–11153 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leeden, MCVD, “Are Conformational Changes, Induced by Osmotic Pressure Variations, the Underlying Mechanism of Controlling the Adhesive Activity of Mussel Adhesive Proteins.” Langmuir, 21 (24) 11373–11379 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu, Y, Bhatnagar, A, Ji, Q, et al., “Influence of Polymerization Conditions on the Molecular Structure Stability and Physical Behavior of Poly(Phenylene Sulfide Sulfone) Homopolymers.” Polymer, 41 (13) 5137–5146 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yuan, S, Wang, J, Wang, X, et al., “Poly(Arylene Sulfide Sulfone) Hybrid Ultrafiltration Membrane with TiO2-g-PAA Nanoparticles: Preparation and Antifouling Performance.” Polym. Eng. Sci., 55 (12) 2829–2837 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, G, Ren, HH, Li, DS, et al., “Synthesis of Highly Refractive and Transparent Poly(Arylene Sulfide Sulfone) Based on 4,6-Dichloropyrimidine and 3,6-Dichloropyridazine.” Polymer, 54 (2) 601–606 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guillen, GR, Pan, Y, Li, M, et al., “Preparation and Characterization of Membranes Formed by Nonsolvent Induced Phase Separation: A Review.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50 (7) 3798–3817 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Coatings Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Polymer Science and Engineering College of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Analytical and Testing Center of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic CompositesBeijingChina
  4. 4.State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering of ChinaSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations