Advertisement

Professionalism Among Chinese Engineers: An Empirical Study

  • Lina Wei
  • Michael DavisEmail author
  • Hangqing Cong
Original Research/Scholarship

Abstract

In 2016, Davis and Zhang surveyed 71 Chinese engineers to investigate the claim that the concept of “profession” may have a far wider range than the term. They concluded that China seems to have a profession of engineering (as Davis has long defined “profession”) even though the Chinese still lacked an exact translation of the English term. In part, the survey reported here simply continues the work of Davis and Zhang. It confirms their result using a much larger, better educated, demographically different pool of 229 Chinese engineers. But, in part too, it does something else. It investigates the concept professional competence—the perceived knowledge, skill, and judgment that those surveyed attribute to themselves and other engineers. The article has four parts. The first part describes the basics of the survey (who was interviewed, how, when, and so on). The second part describes some important features of the survey’s questions, explaining how the questions closely track both the concept of profession and the concept of professional competence. The third part reports and interprets the results relevant to the presence or absence of the concepts of profession and professional competence. The fourth part reports the conclusions.

Keywords

Engineering Profession China Engineers Competence Social contract 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the support from the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China (Research on Ethical Morphology of Chinese Engineering Practice, 15ZDB015), and to Associate Professor Jian Yuan for suggesting a few improvements in the statistical analysis and for his support from the Special Task Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education (Research on the Cultivation of Engineering and Technical Talents, 18JDGC019). Thanks also for comments of several reviewers for this journal.

Supplementary material

11948_2019_158_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (261 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 262 kb)

References

  1. Brandt, R. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cao, N. J., Su, J., & Hu, M. (2014). Ethical awareness in Chinese professional engineering societies: Textual Research on Constitutions of Chinese Engineering Organizations Philosophy and engineering. In D. P. Michelfelder et al. (Eds.) Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process, philosophy of engineering and technology (Vol 15, pp. 203–214).Google Scholar
  3. Davis, M. (1994). Is engineering ethics just business ethics? International Journal of Applied philosophy,8(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis, M. (1996). Professional autonomy: A framework for empirical research. Business Ethics Quarterly,6(4), 448–450.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3857498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer: Essays in the ethics of a profession. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, M. (2009). Is engineering a profession everywhere? Philosophia,37(2), 211–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9125-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, M. (2011). Will software engineering ever be engineering? Communication of the ACM,54(11), 32–34.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2018396.2018407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, M., & Zhang, H. (2017). Proving that China has a profession of engineering: A case study in operationalizing a concept across a cultural divide. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(6), 1581–1596.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9846-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Didier, C., & Derouet, A. (2013). Social responsibility in french engineering education: A historical and sociological analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(4), 1577–1588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9340-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gert, B. (2005). Morality: A new justification of the moral rules (Revise ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., Ray, W., James, P. E., & Englehardt, E. E. (2014). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, C. E., Jr., Pritchard, M. S., Ray, W., James, P. E., Englehardt, E. E., & Rabins, M. J. (2019). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (6th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  13. Iseda, T. (2008). How should we foster the professional integrity of engineers in Japan? A pride-based approach. Science and Engineering Ethics,14(2), 165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9039-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sanders, J. T. (1993). Honor among thieves: Some reflections on codes of professional ethics. Professional Ethics,2(3/4), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,20, 985–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9491-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rousseau, J. (1978). On the social contract. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, H., & Davis, M. (2018). Engineering ethics in China: A century of discussion, organization, and codes. Business & Professional Ethics Journal,37(1), 105–135.  https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201821967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, School of HumanitiesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Ethics in the ProfessionsIllinois Institute of TechnologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations