Pragmatism and Care in Engineering Ethics

  • Indira NairEmail author
  • William M. Bulleit
Original Paper


Engineering is a practice that must function in an environment of incomplete and uncertain knowledge. This environment has become even more difficult in an increasingly complex world. Engineering ethics has to be framed and taught in a way that addresses these realities. This paper proposes a combination of the philosophy of pragmatism and the ethic of care as a possible framework for the practice of engineering ethics that can provide flexibility and openness to address engineering ethics problems more realistically within the ethos and culture of engineering. Embedding values into practice, pragmatism and care provide a broad, reflective, and corrective framework for engineering ethics that can accommodate the realities in which engineering operates. It is shown that these two approaches are more consonant with design methodologies and have a natural fit with design thinking, so they mesh well with what engineers do and with the complexities of their work today. As humans more and more try to alter the socio-techno-natural world, e.g., the earth’s climate, the combination of pragmatism and care will allow enhanced ethical behavior. Alterations to complex adaptive systems will produce highly uncertain results that require engineers to have a mindset that allows them to act with humility in the face of significant uncertainty and potential catastrophic failures.


Care Engineering education Engineering ethics Pragmatism 



The authors would like to extend sincere thanks to Jon A. Schmidt and Ryan Campbell and to the anonymous reviewers for their careful reading and helpful comments on our manuscript. Conversations with Joshua Kardon were very helpful in developing the section on care ethics.


  1. Bernstein, R. (1988). Pragmatism, pluralism, and the healing of wounds. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 382–401). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Broome, T., & Peirce, J. (1997). The heroic engineer. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(1), 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulleit, W. M. (2015). The engineering way of thinking: The idea. STRUCTURE, December, 58.Google Scholar
  4. Bulleit, W. M. (2016a). The engineering way of thinking: Adaptation. STRUCTURE, 82.Google Scholar
  5. Bulleit, W. M. (2016b). The engineering way of thinking: An analysis. STRUCTURE, February, 66.Google Scholar
  6. Bulleit, W. M. (2016c). The engineering way of thinking: The future. STRUCTURE, January, 66.Google Scholar
  7. Bulleit, W. M. (2017). Pragmatism and engineering. Chapter 2. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 13–22). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bulleit, W. M. (2018). Uncertainty in the design and maintenance of social systems. In C. Garcia-Diaz & C. Olaya (Eds.), Social systems engineering: The design of complexity (pp. 31–43). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, R. C. (2013). How can engineering students learn to care? How can engineering faculty teach to care? In J. Lucena (Ed.), Engineering education for social justice: Critical explorations and opportunities (Vol. 10, pp. 111–131). Dordrecht: Springer. Scholar
  10. Campbell, R. C., Yasuhara, K., & Wilson, D. (2015). Ethics in engineering students’ design considerations: Case studies of electric power systems for the ‘developing world’. In Proceedings of the 122nd annual conference and exposition (paper ID #13696). Seattle, Washington: American Society of Engineering Education.Google Scholar
  11. Cross, H. (1952). Engineers and Ivory Towers, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Available at: Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  12. Davis, M. (1998). Thinking like an engineer. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. (2017). In praise of emotion in engineering. Chapter 14. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 181–194). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1888). The ethics of democracy. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 182–204). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1891). Moral theory and practice. International Journal of Ethics, 1(2), 186–203. Available at: Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  16. Dewey, J. (1917). The need for a recovery in philosophy In part. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 219–232). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  18. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York, NY: Dover Publications Inc. (2nd Edition, 1929).Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (2008). The quest for certainty. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 4, p. 1929). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Emison, G. (2004). American pragmatism as a guide for professional ethical conduct for engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 225–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, B., & Tronto, J. (1991). Toward a feminist theory of care. In E. Abel & M. Nelson (Eds.), Circles of care: Work and identity in women’s lives (pp. 35–55). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Goldman, S. (1991). The social captivity of engineering. In P. Durbin (Ed.), Critical perspectives in nonacademic science and engineering (pp. 125–152). Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Grayson, L. P. (1993). The making of an engineer: An illustrated history of engineering in the United States and Canada. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Groenhout, R. (1998). Care theory and the ideal of neutrality in public moral discourse. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 23(2), 170–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, C. E. (2013). Engineering ethics: From preventive ethics to aspirational ethics. Chapter 14. In D. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 177–188). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1995). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (Second Edition, 2000).Google Scholar
  28. Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Herkert, J. M. (2001). Future directions in engineering ethics research: Microethics, macroethics and the role of professional societies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(3), 403–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Herkert, J. M. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(3), 373–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hess, J. L., Beever, J., Strobel, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Empathic perspective-taking and ethical decision-making in engineering ethics education. In D. Michelfelder, B. Newberry, & Q. Zhu (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Exploring boundaries, expanding connections (pp. 163–179). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Hollander, R., & Kahl, N. (2010). Engineering, social justice and sustainable community development, summary of a workshop. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jafarinaimi, N., Nathan, L., & Hargraves, I. (2015). Values as hypotheses: The service that values provide. Design Issues, 31(4), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. James, W. (1981). Introduction. In B. Kuklick (Ed.), Pragmatism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing. (Originally published in 1907)Google Scholar
  35. Jonas, H. (1985). The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, S. A., Michelfelder, D., & Nair, I. (2015). Engineering managers and sustainable systems: The need for and challenges of using an ethical framework for transformative leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production. Scholar
  37. Kardon, J. B. (2003). The standard of care for structural engineers. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Services.Google Scholar
  38. Kardon, J. B. (2005). Concept of ‘care’ in engineering. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 19(3), 256–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Keulartz, F. W., Korthals, J., Schermer, M. M., & Schwartz, T. M. (Eds.). (2002). Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture (p. xxv). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. Walden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  43. Margolis, J. (1995). Historied thought, constructed world: A conceptual primer for the turn of the Millennium. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1983). Ethics in engineering. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. (4th ed. in 2005).Google Scholar
  45. Menand, L. (Ed.). (1997). Pragmatism: A reader. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  46. Moriarty, G. (1995). Ethics, ethos and the professions: Some lessons from engineering. Professional Ethics, 4(1), 75–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moriarty, G. (2008). The engineering project: Its nature, ethics, and promise. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  48. NSPE 1 (n.d.). History of the code of ethics for engineers. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  49. NSPE 2 (n.d.). 100 years of engineering licensure. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.
  50. Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 205–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 7–25). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  52. Peirce, C. S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 26–48). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  53. Peirce, C. S. (1904). A definition of pragmatism. In L. Menand (Ed.), (1997). Pragmatism: A reader (pp. 56–58). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  54. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rorty, R. M. (2010). Philosophy as science, as metaphor, and as politics. In C. J. Voparil & R. J. Bernstein (Eds.), The Rorty reader (pp. 211–226). Chichester, West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  57. Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London, UK: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
  59. Slote, M. (2007). The ethics of care and empathy. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. London: A. Millars.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
  62. Spelman, E. V. (2002). REPAIR: The impulse to restore in a fragile world. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stanley, M. (1981). The technological conscience: Survival and dignity in an age of expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Suckiel, E. K. (1982). The pragmatic philosophy of William James. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  65. Thompson, P. B. (2002). Pragmatism, discourse ethics and occasional philosophy. In F. W. J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer, & T. E. Swierstra (Eds.), Pragmatist ethics for a technological culture (pp. 199–216). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tronto, J. C. (1995). Care as a basis for political judgments. Hypatia, 10(2), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Walther, J., Miller, S. E., & Sochacka, N. W. (2017). A model of empathy in engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and a way of being. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(1), 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weston, A. (1992). Toward better problems: New perspectives on abortion, animal rights, the environment, and justice. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., & Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringMichigan TechHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations