Advertisement

Self-Focused Emotions and Ethical Decision-Making: Comparing the Effects of Regulated and Unregulated Guilt, Shame, and Embarrassment

  • Cory HiggsEmail author
  • Tristan McIntosh
  • Shane Connelly
  • Michael Mumford
Original Paper

Abstract

Research has examined various cognitive processes underlying ethical decision-making, and has recently begun to focus on the differential effects of specific emotions. The present study examines three self-focused moral emotions and their influence on ethical decision-making: guilt, shame, and embarrassment. Given the potential of these discrete emotions to exert positive or negative effects in decision-making contexts, we also examined their effects on ethical decisions after a cognitive reappraisal emotion regulation intervention. Participants in the study were presented with an ethical scenario and were induced, or not induced, to feel guilt, shame, or embarrassment, and were asked to reappraise, or not reappraise, the situation giving rise to those emotions. Responses to questions about the ethical case were evaluated for the quality of ethical sensemaking, perceptions of moral intensity, and decision ethicality. Findings indicate that guilt, shame, and embarrassment are associated with different sensemaking processes and metacognitive reasoning strategies, and resulted in different perceptions of moral intensity. Additionally, cognitive reappraisal had a negative impact on each of these factors. Implications of these findings for ethical decision-making research are discussed.

Keywords

Embarrassment Emotion regulation Ethical decision-making Guilt Shame 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chanda Sanders, Paul Partlow, Logan Steele, Cassandra Fluitt, Leslie Hindman, and Shelby Douglas for their contributions to the present effort.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 367–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angie, A. D., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P., & Kligyte, V. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: A meta-analytic review. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 1393–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babcock, M. K., & Sabini, J. (1990). On differentiating embarrassment from shame. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagdasarov, Z., Thiel, C. E., Johnson, J. F., Connelly, S., Harkrider, L. N., Devenport, L. D., et al. (2013). Case-based ethics instruction: The influence of contextual and individual factors in case content on ethical decision-making. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1305–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bond, F. W., & Bunce, D. (2000). Mediators of change in emotion-focused and problem-focused worksite stress management interventions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29, 1084–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coughlan, R., & Connolly, T. (2008). Investigating unethical decisions at work: Justification and emotion in dilemma resolution. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20, 348–365.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, J. A., & Weary, G. (1993). Depression and the impression-formation continuum: Piecemeal processing despite the availability of category information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ent, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2015). Individual differences in guilt proneness affect how people respond to moral tradeoffs between harm avoidance and obedience to authority. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ethics and Compliance Initiative. (2018). Global business ethics survey. Retrieved from https://www.ethics.org/knowledge-center/2018-gbes. Accessed 27 June 2018.
  13. Ferguson, T. J., & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring guilt in children. A rose by any other name has still thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 19–74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaudine, A., & Thorne, L. (2001). Emotion and ethical decision-making in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 31, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gross, J. J. (1999). Emotion regulation: Past, present, future. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 551–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39, 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haga, S. M., Kraft, P., & Corby, E. K. (2009). Emotion regulation: Antecedents and well-being outcomes of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression in cross-cultural samples. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson (Ed.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hershey, D. A., Walsh, D. A., Read, S. J., & Chulef, A. S. (1990). The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isen, A. M. (2001). An influence of positive affect on decision making in complex situations: Theoretical issues with practical implications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamieson, J. P., Nock, M. K., & Mendes, W. B. (2012). Mind over matter: Reappraising arousal improves cardiovascular and cognitive responses to stress. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson, J. F., & Connelly, S. (2016). Moral disengagement and ethical decision-making: The moderating role of trait guilt and shame. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 15, 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keltner, D., & Buswell, B. N. (1997). Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keng, S., Robins, C. J., Smoski, M. J., Dagenbach, J., & Leary, M. R. (2013). Reappraisal and mindfulness: A comparison of subjective effects and cognitive costs. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 899–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kligyte, V., Connelly, S., Thiel, C., & Devenport, L. (2013). The influence of anger, fear, and emotion regulation on ethical decision making. Human Performance, 26, 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  32. Krishnakumar, S., & Rymph, D. (2012). Uncomfortable ethical decisions: The role of negative emotions and emotional intelligence in ethical decision-making. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24, 321–344.Google Scholar
  33. Leone, L., Perugini, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2005). Emotions and decision making: Regulatory focus moderates the influence of anticipated emotions on action evaluations. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1175–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maitlis, S., & Ozcelik, H. (2004). Toxic decision processes: A study of emotion and organizational decision making. Organization Science, 15, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malooly, A. M., Genet, J. J., & Siemer, M. (2013). Individual differences in reappraisal effectiveness: The role of affective flexibility. Emotion, 13, 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marcy, R. T., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Social innovation: Enhancing creative performance through causal analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. May, D. R., & Pauli, K. P. (2002). The role of moral intensity in ethical decision making: A review and investigation of moral recognition, evaluation, and intention. Business and Society, 41, 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, R. S., & Leary, M. R. (1992). Social sources and interactive functions of emotion: The case of embarrassment. In M. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 14. Emotion and social behavior (pp. 202–221). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, R. S., & Tangney, J. P. (1994). Differentiating embarrassment and shame. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Devenport, L. D., Antes, A. L., Brown, R. P., et al. (2009). Field and experience influences on ethical decision making in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19, 263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., et al. (2006). Validation of ethical decision making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. Annual Review of Research in Multi-Level Issues, 1, 3–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Van Doorn, J. R. (2001). Performance in planning: Processes, requirements, and errors. Review of General Psychology, 5, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Niedenthal, P. M., Tangney, J. P., & Gavanski, I. (1994). “ If only I weren’t” versus” If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pfister, H. R., & Böhm, G. (2008). The multiplicity of emotions: A framework of emotional functions in decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 5.Google Scholar
  50. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rest, J. (1983). Morality. In J. Flavell & E. Markman (Eds.), Manual of child psychology: Cognitive development (Vol. III, pp. 556–629). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  53. Rest, J. (1994). Background theory and research. In J. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions (pp. 13–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Sheppes, G., & Meiran, N. (2008). Divergent cognitive costs for online forms of reappraisal and distraction. Emotion, 8, 870–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Small, D. A., & Lerner, J. S. (2008). Emotional policy: Personal sadness and anger shape judgments about a welfare case. Political Psychology, 29, 149–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stenmark, C. K., Antes, A. L., Wang, X., Caughron, J. J., Thiel, C. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2010). Strategies in forecasting outcomes in ethical decision-making: Identifying and analyzing the causes of the problem. Ethics and Behavior, 20, 110–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tangney, J. P. (1991). Moral affect: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tangney, J. P. (1998). How does guilt differ from shame? In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 1–17). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  60. Tangney, J. P., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  61. Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thiel, C. E., Bagdasarov, Z., Harkrider, L., Johnson, J. F., & Mumford, M. D. (2012a). Leader ethical decision-making in organizations: Strategies for sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2011). The influence of anger on ethical decision making: Comparison of a primary and secondary appraisal. Ethics and Behavior, 21, 380–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thiel, C. E., Connelly, S., & Griffith, J. A. (2012b). Leadership and emotion management for complex tasks: Different emotions, different strategies. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Brunner, A., Friedman, R., & Jones, M. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance: Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion, 18, 58–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousands Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  67. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cory Higgs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tristan McIntosh
    • 2
  • Shane Connelly
    • 1
  • Michael Mumford
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of OklahomaNormanUSA
  2. 2.Division of General Medical SciencesWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations