Advertisement

Science and Engineering Ethics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 463–476 | Cite as

Responsible Conduct of Human Subjects Research in Islamic Communities

  • Aceil Al-KhatibEmail author
  • Michael Kalichman
Original Paper

Abstract

In order to increase understanding of the ethical implications of biomedical, behavioral and clinical research, the Fogarty International Center, part of the United States National Institutes of Health, established an International Research Ethics Education and Curriculum Development Award (R25) to support programs in low- and middle-income countries. To develop research ethics expertise in Jordan, the University of California San Diego fellowship program in collaboration with Jordan University of Science and Technology provides courses that enable participants to develop skills in varied research ethics topics, including research with human subjects. The program provides a master’s level curriculum, including practicum experiences. In this article we describe a practicum project to modify an existing introduction to human subjects research for a US audience to be linguistically and culturally appropriate to Arabic-speaking-Islamic communities. We also highlight key differences that guided the conversion of an English version to one that is in Arabic. And finally, as Institutional Review Boards follow the ethical principles of the Belmont Report in evaluating and approving biomedical and behavioral human subjects research proposals, we provide observations on the conformity of the three ethical principles of the Belmont Report with Islam.

Keywords

Human subjects research Respect for persons Beneficence Justice Pluralistic societies Islam 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Al-Khatib is a participant in the Research Ethics Education Program in Jordan supported by grant #5R25TW010026-02 from the Fogarty International Center of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The project described was also partially supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant UL1TR001442. The content and opinions are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Fogarty International Center or the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Afifi, R. Y. (2007). Biomedical research ethics: An Islamic view—part I. International Journal of Surgery, 5(5), 292–296.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Aqeel, A. I. (2009). Human cloning, stem cell research. An Islamic perspective. Saudi Medical Journal, 30(12), 1507–1514.Google Scholar
  3. Alfano, S. L. (2013). Conducting research with human subjects in international settings: Ethical considerations. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 86(3), 315–321.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, M. A. (2016). Pedagogical support for responsible conduct of research training. Hastings Center Report, 46(1), 18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benatar, S. R. (2001). Distributive justice and clinical trials in the third world. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22(3), 169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011419820440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fadel, H. E. (2010). Ethics of clinical research: An Islamic perspective. Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America.  https://doi.org/10.5915/42-2-5512.Google Scholar
  7. Fadel, H. E. (2012). Developments in stem cell research and therapeutic cloning: Islamic ethical positions, a review. Bioethics, 26(3), 128–135.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01840.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ghaly, M., Sadoun, E., Alkuraya, F., Fakhro, K., Ismail, S., & Ben-Omran, T. (2016). [G]enomics in the gulf region and Islamic ethics. http://www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/institute-of-global-health-innovation/Islamic-Ethics-Report-English-(1).pdf
  9. Gillon, R. (1994). Medical ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope. BMJ : British Medical Journal, 309(6948), 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IMANA Ethics Committee. (2005). Islamic medical ethics: the IMANA perspective. Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America, 37(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/37-1-5528. http://jima.imana.org/article/view/5528/37. Accessed July 25, 2017.
  11. Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating spirituality in primary care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalichman, M. W. (2013). Why teach research ethics? In F. F. Benya, C. H. Fletcher, & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators: Papers and summary from a workshop December 12, 2012Google Scholar
  13. Kalichman, M. (2014). Rescuing RCR education. Accountability in Research, 21(1), 68–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamali, M. H. (1991). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. The Islamic Text Society. http://islamland.com/uploads/books/en_Principles_of_Islamic_Jurisprudence_2.pdf. Accessed July 25, 2017.
  15. Kodjo, C. (2009). Cultural competence in clinician communication. Pediatrics in Review/American Academy of Pediatrics, 30(2), 57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1542/pir.30-2-57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LaFee, S. (2017). Training better scientists half a world away. UC San Diego UC San Diego News Center. http://ucsdnews.ucsd.edu/feature/training_better_scientists_half_a_world_away?utm_campaign=thisweek&utm_medium=web&utm_source=tw–web. Accessed September 30, 2017.
  17. Marshall, P. A. (2005). Human rights, cultural pluralism, and international health research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 26, 529–557.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-2199-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller, P. S., Plevak, D. J., & Rummans, T. A. (2001). Religious involvement, spirituality, and medicine: Implications for clinical practice. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 76(12), 1225–1235.  https://doi.org/10.4065/76.12.1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. National Institutes of Health. Cultural Respect. (2015) Retrieved from http://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-office-director/office-communications-public-liaison/clear-communication/cultural-respect. Accessed September 30, 2017.
  20. Niebroj, L. (2010). Bioethics of life programs: Taking seriously moral pluralism in clinical settings. European Journal of Medical Research, 15(Suppl 2), 98–101.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783X-15-S2-98.Google Scholar
  21. NIH. (1989). Requirements for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. Guide for Grants and Contracts on December 22, 1989 (Vol. 18, No. 45) http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf. Accessed September 30, 2017.
  22. NIH. (2000). Required education in the protection of human research participants. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-00-039.html. Accessed October 24, 2017.
  23. NIH. (2009). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Notice Number: NOT-OD-10-019 http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-10-019.html. Accessed September 30, 2017.
  24. Packer, S. (2011). Informed consent with a focus on Islamic views. Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America.  https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9040.Google Scholar
  25. Pavone, I. R. (2012). Biomedical research in developing countries and international human rights law. In Human Medical Research (pp. 65–86). Springer, Basel.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0390-8_7
  26. Rathor, M., Rani, M., Shah, A., Leman, W., Akter, S., & Omar, A. (2011). The principle of autonomy as related to personal decision making concerning health and research from an ‘Islamic Viewpoint’. Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America.  https://doi.org/10.5915/43-1-6396.Google Scholar
  27. Serour, G. I. (2008). Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 17, 34–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60328-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Titus, S. L., & Ballou, J. M. (2014). Ensuring PhD development of responsible conduct of research behaviors: Who’s responsible? Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(1), 221–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9437-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torry, M. (2017). Ethical religion in primary care. London Journal of Primary Care, 9(4), 49–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2017.1317407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vollmer, S. H., & Howard, G. (2010). Statistical power, the Belmont report, and the ethics of clinical trials. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(4), 675–691.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9244-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walton, L. M., Akram, F., & Hossain, F. (2014). Health beliefs of muslim women and implications for health care providers: Exploratory study on the health beliefs of muslim women. Online Journal of Health Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1002.05.Google Scholar
  32. Wolf, S. M., Crock, B. N., Van Ness, B., Lawrenz, F., Kahn, J. P., Beskow, L. M., et al. (2012). Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived datasets. Genetics in Medicine, 14(4), 361–384.  https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2012.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of DentistryJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan
  2. 2.Research Ethics Program 0612University of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations