Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities
Researchers of the Northeast Ethics Education Partnership (NEEP) at Brown University sought to improve an understanding of the ethical challenges of field researchers with place-based communities in environmental studies/sciences and environmental health by disseminating a questionnaire which requested information about their ethical approaches to these researched communities. NEEP faculty sought to gain actual field guidance to improve research ethics and cultural competence training for graduate students and faculty in environmental sciences/studies. Some aspects of the ethical challenges in field studies are not well-covered in the literature. More training and information resources are needed on the bioethical challenges in environmental field research relating to maximizing benefits/reducing risks to local inhabitants and ecosystems from research; appropriate and effective group consent and individual consent processes for many diverse communities in the United States and abroad; and justice considerations of ensuring fair benefits and protections against exploitation through community-based approaches, and cultural appropriateness and competence in researcher relationships.
KeywordsBioethical principles Community-based participatory research Cultural competence Diversity Environmental science Environmental studies Field research methods Informed consent Nonmaleficence Research ethics
Funding was provided by National Science Foundation, Ethics Education in Science and Engineering (EESE) (Grant No. GEO-1338751).
- Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. London: Oxford University.Google Scholar
- Bengston, D. N., Schermann, M. A., Hawj F., & Moua, M. (2012). Culturally appropriate environmental education: An example of a partnership with the Hmong American community. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 11(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). (1991/2008). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva.Google Scholar
- Dougill, J., Nshimbi, M., Chama, F., Falcao, M., Munyemba, F., Syampungani, S., et al. (2014). Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community. Journal of Environmental Management, 137, 137–145.Google Scholar
- Flicker, S., & Worthington, C. A. (2012). Public health research involving aboriginal peoples: Research ethics board Stakeholders' reflections on ethics principles and research processes. Canadian Journal of Public Health / Revue Canadienne de Santé Publique 103(1), 19–22.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.Google Scholar
- International Society for Ethnobotany, Code of Ethics; at http://www.ethnobiology.net/.
- Johnson-Shelton, D., Moreno-Black, G., Ever, C., & Zwink, N. (2015). A community-based participatory research approach for preventing childhood obesity: The communities and schools together project. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, Research, Education and Action, 9(3), 351–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kalabuanga, M., Ravinetto, R., Maketa, V., Mavoko, H. M., Fungala, B., da Luz, R. I., et al. (2016). The challenges of research informed consent in socio-economically vulnerable populations: A viewpoint form the democratic Republic of Congo. Developing World Bioethics 1471–8847 (online) 16(2), pp 64–69.Google Scholar
- Kimmerer, R. (2000). Native knowledge for native ecosystem. Journal of Forestry, 98, 8.Google Scholar
- McCabe, M., Morgan, F., Curley, H., Begay, R., & Gohdes, D. (2005). The informed consent process in a cross-cultural setting: Is the process achieving the intended result? Ethnicity and Disease, 15, 300–304.Google Scholar
- Menzie, C. (2006). Traditional ecological knowledge and natural resource management. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
- Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.Google Scholar
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (1999). Research involving human biological materials: ethical issues and policy guidance. Report and Recommendations (vol. 1). Rockville, MD. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html,.
- National Bioethics Advisory Commission (NBAC). (2001). Ethical policy issues in international research: clinical trails in developing countries. Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission (vol. 1). Bethesda, MD: NBAC. http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/pubs.html,.
- Roburn, S., & T. Hwech’in Heritage Dept. (2012). Weathering changes: Cultivating local and traditional knowledge of environmental change in Tr’ondëk Hwëch’in traditional territory. Arctic, 65(4), 439–455.Google Scholar
- Shore, N, Brazauskas, R., Drew, E., Wong, K. A., Moy, L., Baden, A. C., Cyr, K., Ulevicus, J., & Seifer, S. D. (2011). Understanding Community-Based Processes for Research Ethics Review: A National Study. American Journal of Public Health. Supplement 1, Vol 101, No. S1.Google Scholar
- Society for Applied Anthropology, A Worldwide Organization for the Applied Social Sciences—About SAA, Ethics. at https://www.sfaa.net/.
- Society for Conservation Biology. At http://conbio.org/about-scb/who-we-are/code-of-ethics.
- Taylor, H. A., Faden, R. R., & Kass, N. E. (2008). The ethics of public health research. Moral obligations to communities. International Encyclopedia of Public Health, 3, 496–503.Google Scholar
- Yi, L. (2011). Translating interviews, translating lives: Ethical considerations in cross-language narrative inquiry. TESL Canada Journal, 28(SI5), 16.Google Scholar