Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment

ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Despite more than 25 years of a requirement for training in the responsible conduct of research (RCR), there is still little consensus about what such training should include, how it should be delivered, nor what constitutes “effectiveness” of such training. This lack of consensus on content, approaches and outcomes is evident in recent data showing high variability in the development and implementation of RCR instruction across universities and programs. If we accept that one of the primary aims of instruction in RCR/research ethics is “to foster a community of social responsibility” (Antes et al. 2009: 398), then it makes sense to consider the research environment itself—where learning one’s science happens where one also engages in social interaction around that science. In order to take the best advantage of that already existing/naturally occurring research environment, the authors, through a deliberative, collaborative, and integrative process, crafted a workshop curriculum meant to arm research faculty with concrete and specific tools to effectively introduce research ethics in the context of the research environment.

Keywords

Research ethics Responsible conduct of research Curriculum development Mentoring 

References

  1. Anderson, M. S. (2011). Research misconduct and misbehavior. In T. Bertram Gallant (Ed.), Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change in higher education (pp. 83–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., DeVries, R., & Martinson, B. C. (2007). What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 853–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, M. S., Louis, K. S., & Earle, J. (1994). Disciplinary and departmental effects on observations of faculty and graduate student misconduct. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L.D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bebeau, M. J. (2002). Influencing the moral dimensions of professional practice: Implications for teaching and assessing for research integrity. In N. A. Steneck & M. H. Sheetz (Eds.), Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity (pp. 179–187). Washington, DC: Office of Research Integrity. http://www.ori.hhs.gov/documents/proceedings_rri.pdf.
  6. Bebeau, M. J., Pimple, K. D., Muskavitch, K. M. T., Borden, S. L., & Smith, D. H. (1995). Moral reasoning in scientific research: Cases for teaching and assessment (p. 83). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, P. (2008). Meetings that changed the world: Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature, 455, 290–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., & Kalichman, M. W. (1998). Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(4), 487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drake, M., Griffin, P., Kirkman, R., & Swann, J. (2005). Engineering ethical curricula: Assessment and comparison of two approaches. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DuBois, J. M., Schilling, D., Heitman, E., Steneck, N., & Kon, A. (2010). Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: An inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs. Clinical and Translational Science, 3(3), 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E., & Ordway, S. (1996). Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisen, A., & Berry, R. M. (2002). The Absent Professor: Why we don’t teach research ethics and what to do about it. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, D., & Stern, J. E. (1996). Evaluating teaching and students’ learning of academic research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2, 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Klag, M. J., & Krag, S. S. (2002). On the importance of research ethics and mentoring. The American Journal of Bioethics 2(4), 50–51. The MIT Press. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from Project MUSE database.Google Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, D. S. (2001). The recombinant DNA controversy: A memoir. Science, politics, and the public interest 1974–1981. Washington, DC: ASM Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryer-Edwards, K. (2002). Addressing the hidden curriculum in scientific research. American Journal of Bioethics, 2(4), 58–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heitman, E., & Petty, J. (2010). Preparing students to navigate cross-national differences in the research environment. In M. S. Anderson & N. H. Steneck (Eds.), International research collaborations: Much to be gained, many ways to get in trouble (pp. 201–214). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Heitman, E., Salis, P. J., & Bulger, R. E. (2001). Teaching ethics in biomedical science: Effects on moral reasoning skills. In Proceedings of the first ORI research conference on research integrity (pp. 195–202).Google Scholar
  19. Kalichman, M. (2013). A brief history of RCR education. Accountability in Research, 20(5–6), 380–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1992). A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine, 67, 769–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalichman, M. W., & Hinman, L. M. (2005). Consensus and the search for pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Reviews, 1(4), 287–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalichman, M. W., & Plemmons, D. (2007). Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langlais, P. J., & Bent, B. J. (2014). Individual and organizational predictors of the ethicality of graduate students’ responses to research integrity issues. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 897. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9471-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-42374-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, D., Rao, A., & Sloan, L. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: A criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human Organization, 70(1), 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2012). Designing effective instruction (7th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K.E., Mumford, M.D. & Connelly, S.  (2016). Review of instructional approaches in ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9803-0.Google Scholar
  28. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., Waples, E.P., & Devenport, L.D. (2008). A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Academy of Engineering. (2009). Ethics education and scientific and engineering research: What’s been learned? What should be done? Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12695.Google Scholar
  30. NIFA/USDA. (2013). Responsible and ethical conduct of research. https://nifa.usda.gov/responsible-and-ethical-conduct-research.
  31. NIH. (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 18(45), 1. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf.
  32. NIH. (1992). Reminder and update: Requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award institutional training grants. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 21(43). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not92-236.html.
  33. NIH. (2009). Update on the requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Release Date: November 24, 2009. NOTICE: OD-10-019. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-019.html.
  34. NSF. (2009). RCR frequently asked questions. https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/rcr/rcrfaqs.jsp.
  35. Peiffer, A. M., Laurenti, P. J., & Hugenschmidt, C. E. (2008). Fostering a culture of responsible lab conduct. Science, 322, 1186. doi:10.1126/science.322.5905.1186b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plemmons, D. K., & Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Reported goals for knowledge to be learned in responsible conduct of research courses. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2(2), 57–66. doi:10.1525/jer.2007.2.2.57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Plemmons, D. K., & Kalichman, M. W. (2013). Reported goals of instructors of responsible conduct of research for teaching of skills. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 8(2), 95–103. doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.2.95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Powell, S., Allison, M. A., & Kalichman, M. W. (2007). Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: A preliminary study. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(2), 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Resnik, D. B., & Dinse, G. E. (2012). Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal requirements for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 87(9), 1237–1242. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318260fe5c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schmaling, K. B., & Blume, A. W. (2009). Ethics instruction increases graduate students’ responsible conduct of research knowledge but not moral reasoning. Accountability in Research, 16(5), 268–283. doi:10.1080/08989620903190323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Soto, V. J. (2013). Which instructional design models are educators using to design virtual world instruction? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 364–375.Google Scholar
  42. Steneck, N. H., & Bulger, R. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swazey, J. P., & Anderson, M. S. (1996). Mentors, advisors, and role models in graduate and professional education. Washington, DC: Association of Academic Health Centers.Google Scholar
  44. Watkins, D. A., & Biggs, J. B. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences (p. 287). Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  45. Watts, L. L., Medeiros, K. E., Mulhearn, T. J., Steele, L. M., Connelly, S., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Are ethics training programs improving? A meta-analytic review of past and present ethics instruction in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1182025.Google Scholar
  46. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Brighton: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  48. Whitbeck, C. (2001). Group mentoring to foster the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Ethics Education ProgramUniversity of California, RiversideRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Research Ethics ProgramUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations