Advertisement

Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 681–693 | Cite as

Tenderization of Yak Meat by the Combination of Papain and High-Pressure Processing Treatments

  • Yuan Ma
  • Yiping Yuan
  • Xiufang BiEmail author
  • Li Zhang
  • Yage XingEmail author
  • Zhenming Che
Original Paper
  • 277 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of papain and high-pressure processing (HPP), applied separately or in combination, on the tenderization of yak meat were studied regarding texture, water-holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), pH, and color. When papain was used alone, both the papain concentration level and treatment time could affect the tenderization. The maximal shear force (MSF) of yak meat was decreased by 46.85% and the WHC was increased by 9.93% when 80 U/mL papain was injected into yak meat and then incubated at 55 °C for 120 min. However, the color was significantly deteriorated. When the HPP treatment was performed alone, the MSF of yak meat displayed an initial decrease followed by an increase as the processing pressure or treatment time rose. Although an improved tenderizing effect was achieved at 250 MPa/15 min, leading to a MSF decline of 49.27% and a WHC increase of 10.50%, the meat turned white. Applying treatment sequences of an HPP and papain combination can significantly influence the tenderization effect. Optimal tenderization was obtained by the injection of papain (80 U/mL) and incubation at 55 °C for 30 min followed by HPP at 50 MPa/15 min (Pap → HPP). Results from this process indicated that the MSF of yak meat was decreased by 46.30% and 50.27%, respectively, compared to the separate applications of both HPP (50 MPa/15 min) and papain (80 U/mL, 30 min) treatments. Meanwhile, no significant color change was detected. The microstructure of yak meat was analyzed following the application of different treatments. Results suggest that the meat treated with Pap → HPP exhibited larger spacing and more damaged cells than untreated meat or the sample subjected to other treatments. These findings provided a possible explanation for the specific tenderization result when exposed to the combined treatments.

Keywords

Yak meat High-pressure processing Papain Tenderization 

Notes

Funding Information

This work was supported by the Industrial Cluster Cooperative Innovation Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2016-XT00-00031-NC), the Key Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Education (17ZA0356), the Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology Achievement Conversion Project (16NZ0081), the Xihua University Graduate Student Innovation Fund (ycjj2018043), the Fund of Application of Infrastructure Project of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (2016JY0114), and the Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2015-HM01-00337-SF).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11947_2019_2245_MOESM1_ESM.docx (32 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 32 kb)

References

  1. Abdel-Naeem, H. H. S., & Mohamed, H. M. H. (2016). Improving the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of camel meat burger patties using ginger extract and papain. Meat Science, 118, 52–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alahakoon, A. U., Oey, I., Bremer, P., & Silcock, P. (2018). Optimisation of sous vide processing parameters for pulsed electric fields treated beef briskets. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11(11), 2055–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-018-2155-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashie, I. N. A., Sorensen, T. L., & Nielsen, P. M. (2010). Effects of papain and a microbial enzyme on meat proteins and beef tenderness. Journal of Food Science, 67(6), 2138–2142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai, W. L., Yin, R. H., Zhao, S. J., Li, C., Ma, Z. J., Yin, R. L., Luo, G. B., & Zhao, Z. H. (2010). A PCR assay for sex determination of yak (Bos grunniens) meat by amplification of the male-specific SRY gene. Food Control, 21(5), 726–731.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.10.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bajovic, B., Bolumar, T., & Heinz, V. (2012). Quality considerations with high pressure processing of fresh and value added meat products. Meat Science, 92(3), 280–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bak, K. H., Lindahl, G., Karlsson, A. H., & Orlien, V. (2012). Effect of high pressure, temperature, and storage on the color of porcine longissimus dorsi. Meat Science, 92(4), 374–381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barekat, S., & Soltanizadeh, N. (2017a). Improvement of meat tenderness by simultaneous application of high-intensity ultrasonic radiation and papain treatment. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 39, 223–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.12.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barekat, S., & Soltanizadeh, N. (2017b). Effects of ultrasound on microstructure and enzyme penetration in beef longissimus lumborum muscle. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11(3), 680–693.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-017-2043-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caine, W. R., Aalhus, J. L., Best, D. R., Dugan, M. E. R., & Jeremiah, L. E. (2003). Relationship of texture profile analysis and Warner-Bratzler shear force with sensory characteristics of beef rib steaks. Meat Science, 64(4), 333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00110-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheftel, J. C., & Culioli, J. (1997). Effects of high pressure on meat: a review. Meat Science, 46(3), 211–236.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, L., Feng, X. C., Lu, F., Xu, X. L., Zhou, G. H., Li, Q. Y., & Guo, X. Y. (2011). Effects of camptothecin, etoposide and Ca2+ on caspase-3 activity and myofibrillar disruption of chicken during postmortem ageing. Meat Science, 87(3), 165–174.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, X., Li, P. J., Nishiumi, T., Takumi, H., Suzuki, A., & Chen, C. G. (2014). Effects of high-pressure processing on the cooking loss and gel strength of chicken breast actomyosin containing sodium alginate. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 7(12), 3608–3617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiavaro, E., Rinaldi, M., Vittadini, E., & Barbanti, D. (2009). Cooking of pork longissimus dorsi at different temperature and relative humidity values: effects on selected physico-chemical properties. Journal of Food Engineering, 93(2), 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doneva, M., Miteva, D., Dyankova, S., Nacheva, I., Metodieva, P., & Dimov, K. (2015). Efficiency of plant proteases bromelain and papain on turkey meat tenderness. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 31(3), 407–413.  https://doi.org/10.2298/bah1503407d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duranton, F., Simonin, H., Cheret, R., Guillou, S., & de Lamballerie, M. (2012). Effect of high pressure and salt on pork meat quality and microstructure. Journal of Food Science, 77(8), E188–E194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02816.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng, X., Zhu, Y., Liu, Q., Lai, S., & Yang, H. (2017). Effects of bromelain tenderisation on myofibrillar proteins, texture and flavour of fish balls prepared from Golden Pomfret. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 10, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gao, H., Zeng, J., Ma, H., Wang, Z., & Pan, R. (2014). Improving tenderness of goose breast by ultra-high pressure. International Journal of Food Properties, 18(8), 1693–1701.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2014.933438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerelt, B., Ikeuchi, Y., & Suzuki, A. (2000). Meat tenderization by proteolytic enzymes after osmotic dehydration. Meat Science, 56(3), 311–318.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossi, A., Gkarane, V., Otte, J. A., Ertbjerg, P., & Orlien, V. (2012). High pressure treatment of brine enhanced pork affects endopeptidase activity, protein solubility, and peptide formation. Food Chemistry, 134(3), 1556–1563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.089.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong, G. P., Park, S. H., Kim, J. Y., Lee, S. K., & Min, S. G. (2005). Effects of time-dependent high pressure treatment on physico-chemical properties of pork. Food Science & Biotechnology, 14(6), 808–812.Google Scholar
  21. ISO (8589–1988) Sensory analysis; general guidance for the design of test rooms. International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  22. Istrati, D. (2008). The influence of enzymatic tenderization with papain on functional properties of adult. Beef, 14, 140–146.Google Scholar
  23. Jung, S., de Lamballerie-Anton, M., & Ghoul, M. (2000). Modifications of ultrastructure and myofibrillar proteins of post-rigor beef treated by high pressure. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 33(4), 313–319.  https://doi.org/10.1006/fstl.2000.0654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kamal, S., Rehman, S., & Iqbal, H. M. N. (2017). Biotechnological valorization of proteases: from hyperproduction to industrial exploitation—a review. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 36(2), 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Katsaros, G. I., Katapodis, P., & Taoukis, P. S. (2009). High hydrostatic pressure inactivation kinetics of the plant proteases ficin and papain. Journal of Food Engineering, 91(1), 42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kemp, C. M., Sensky, P. L., Bardsley, R. G., Buttery, P. J., & Parr, T. (2010). Tenderness--an enzymatic view. Meat Science, 84(2), 248–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang, Y., Sha, K., Rui, Z., Peng, X., Xin, L., Sun, B., et al. (2016). Effect of electrical stimulation and hot boning on the eating quality of Gannan yak longissimus lumborum. Meat Science, 112(4), 3–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowder, A. C., Waite-Cusic, J. G., & Mireles DeWitt, C. A. (2014). High pressure–low temperature processing of beef: effects on survival of internalized E. coli O157:H7 and quality characteristics. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 26, 18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2014.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marcos, B., & Mullen, A. M. (2014). High pressure induced changes in beef muscle proteome: correlation with quality parameters. Meat Science, 97(1), 11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.12.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morton, J. D., Pearson, R. G., Lee, H. Y., Smithson, S., Mason, S. L., & Bickerstaffe, R. (2017). High pressure processing improves the tenderness and quality of hot-boned beef. Meat Science, 133, 69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.06.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morton, J. D., Lee, H. Y., Pearson, R. G., & Bickerstaffe, R. (2018). The physical and biochemical effects of pre-rigor high pressure processing of beef. Meat Science, 143, 129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.021.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Neto, O. C., Rosenthal, A., Deliza, R., Torrezan, R., Ferreira, J. C. S., Leal, W. F., Jr., & Gaspar, A. (2015). Effects of hydrostatic pressure processing on texture and color of zebu beef. Food & Bioprocess Technology, 8(4), 837–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Omana, D. A., Plastow, G., & Betti, M. (2011). The use of beta-glucan as a partial salt replacer in high pressure processed chicken breast meat. Food Chemistry, 129(3), 768–776.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Oort, M. V., Whitehurst, R. J., & Oort, M. V. (2009). Enzymes in food technology – introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Pietrasik, Z., & Shand, P. J. (2011). Effects of moisture enhancement, enzyme treatment, and blade tenderization on the processing characteristics and tenderness of beef semimembranosus steaks. Meat Science, 88(1), 8–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Poulter, R. G., Ledward, D. A., Godber, S., Hall, G., & Rowlands, B. (2010). Heat stability of fish muscle proteins. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 20(2), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Realini, C. E., Guàrdia, M. D., Garriga, M., Pérezjuan, M., & Arnau, J. (2011). High pressure and freezing temperature effect on quality and microbial inactivation of cured pork carpaccio. Meat Science, 88(3), 542–547.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodrigues, I., Trindade, M. A., Caramit, F. R., Candoğan, K., Pokhrel, P. R., & Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. (2016). Effect of high pressure processing on physicochemical and microbiological properties of marinated beef with reduced sodium content. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 38, 328–333.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2016.09.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schenková, N., Šikulová, M., Jeleníková, J., Pipek, P., Houška, M., & Marek, M. (2007). Influence of high isostatic pressure and papain treatment on the quality of beef meat. High Pressure Research, 27(1), 163–168.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08957950601088869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schenková, N., Šikulová, M., Jeleníková, J., Pipek, P., Marek, M., & Voldřich, M. (2018). Influence of high pressure and papain treatment on some aspects of beef meat quality. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 22, 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shén, S. C., Fleming, E. M., & Castle, W. B. (1949). Studies on the destruction of red blood cells. V. Irreversibly sickled erythrocytes : their experimental production in vitro. Blood, 4(5), 498–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Shin, H.-G., Choi, Y.-M., Kim, H.-K., Ryu, Y.-C., Lee, S.-H., & Kim, B.-C. (2008). Tenderization and fragmentation of myofibrillar proteins in bovine longissimus dorsi muscle using proteolytic extract from Sarcodon aspratus. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 41(8), 1389–1395.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2007.08.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Souza, C. M., Boler, D. D., Clark, D. L., Kutzler, L. W., Holmer, S. F., Summerfield, J. W., Cannon, J. E., Smit, N. R., McKeith, F. K., & Killefer, J. (2011). The effects of high pressure processing on pork quality, palatability, and further processed products. Meat Science, 87(4), 419–427.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.11.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan, G. A., & Calkins, C. R. (2010). Application of exogenous enzymes to beef muscle of high and low-connective tissue. Meat Science, 85(4), 730–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.03.033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun, X. D., & Holley, R. A. (2010). High hydrostatic pressure effects on the texture of meat and meat products. Journal of Food Science, 75(1), R17–R23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun, Q., Chen, F., Geng, F., Luo, Y., Gong, S., & Jiang, Z. (2018). A novel aspartic protease from Rhizomucor miehei expressed in Pichia pastoris and its application on meat tenderization and preparation of turtle peptides. Food Chemistry, 245, 570–577.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Tian, J., Han, L., Yu, Q., Shi, X., & Wang, W. (2013). Changes in tenderness and cathepsins activity during post mortem ageing of yak meat. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 93(3), 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang, H., Khan, M. A., Yu, X., Zheng, H., Han, M., Xu, X., & Zhou, G. (2016). Changes in protein structures to improve the rheology and texture of reduced-fat sausages using high pressure processing. Meat Science, 121, 79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zuo, H., Han, L., Yu, Q., Niu, K., Zhao, S., & Shi, H. (2016). Proteome changes on water-holding capacity of yak longissimus lumborum during postmortem aging. Meat Science, 121, 409–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.07.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sichuan Key Laboratory of Food Bio-technology, School of Food and BioengineeringXihua UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Food Non-thermal Processing, Engineering and Technology Research Center for Food Non-thermal ProcessingYibin Xihua University Research InstituteYibinChina

Personalised recommendations