Advertisement

Food and Bioprocess Technology

, Volume 12, Issue 9, pp 1593–1602 | Cite as

Characterization of Quinoa Defatted by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide. Starch Enzymatic Susceptibility and Structural, Pasting and Thermal Properties

  • Ángela García Solaesa
  • Marina Villanueva
  • Sagrario Beltrán
  • Felicidad RondaEmail author
Original Paper
  • 129 Downloads

Abstract

Quinoa has recently been considered as an alternative oilseed crop due to the quality and quantity of its lipid fraction. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) was used as a green process to extract quinoa oil without solvent residues. Defatted quinoa flour is a potentially valuable raw material whose performance as food ingredient needs to be established. Structural, physicochemical, pasting, and thermal properties of quinoa (cv. Titicaca) defatted by supercritical CO2 extraction (DQ-SCCO2) were characterized. In vitro starch enzymatic susceptibility was also evaluated. Full fatted quinoa (NDQ) and quinoa defatted by hexane extraction (DQ-HX) were also evaluated in parallel. DQ-SCCO2 showed a disrupted and microporous structure due to the pressurization/depressurization of CO2 in SFE. However, its viscometric profile was very similar to that of NDQ, while that of DQ-HX was significantly lower. This denotes a physical/thermal modification of the flour as a result of the higher temperature applied during hexane extraction, 68 °C, versus 40 °C in SFE. Defatted samples showed lower pasting temperatures (4–5 °C) and higher amylopectin retrogradation extent than NDQ. Quinoa showed a very high enzymatic susceptibility regardless its lipid content; 90% of the starch was hydrolyzed by digestive enzymes in 20 min in the three samples. However, defatted quinoa had lower slowly digestible starch content than NDQ, being the lowest value for DQ-SCCO2 sample. The work confirms the feasibility of using DQ-SCCO2 as a raw material in food applications, free of solvent residues, and with a technological quality superior to that obtained by extraction with organic solvents.

Keywords

Quinoa Supercritical CO2 oil extraction Pasting properties Thermal properties SEM In vitro starch enzymatic hydrolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Joanna Harasym for her technical comments and support during the development of the work and IESMAT (Madrid, España) for the determination of the particle size distribution of quinoa samples with Mastersizer 3000.

Funding Information

The financial support was provided by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) (AGL2015-63849-C2-2-R) and the Junta de Castilla y León/FEDER VA072P17.

References

  1. AACC. (1999). AACC International methods, 44-19.01. Moisture-air-oven method. AACC International Approved Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2005.04.006.
  2. AACC. (2014). AACC International method, 76-31.01. Determination of damaged starch-spectrophotometric method. AACC International Approved Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1094/AACCIntMethod-76-33.01.
  3. Abebe, W., Collar, C., & Ronda, F. (2015). Impact of variety type and particle size distribution on starch enzymatic hydrolysis and functional properties of tef flours. Carbohydrate Polymers, 115, 260–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Abugoch James, L. E. (2009). Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. In Advances in Food and Nutrition Research (Vol. 58, pp. 1–31).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58001-1.
  5. Annor, G. A., Marcone, M., Bertoft, E., & Seetharaman, K. (2013). In vitro starch digestibility and expected glycemic index of kodo millet (Paspalum scrobiculatum) as affected by starch-protein-lipid interactions. Cereal Chemistry, 90(3), 211–217.  https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-06-12-0074-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avila Ruiz, G., Arts, A., Minor, M., & Schutyser, M. (2016). A hybrid dry and aqueous fractionation method to obtain protein-rich fractions from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Food and Bioprocess Technology, 9(9), 1502–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-016-1731-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benito-Román, O., Rodríguez-Perrino, M., Sanz, M. T., Melgosa, R., & Beltrán, S. (2018). Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of quinoa oil: Study of the influence of process parameters on the extraction yield and oil quality. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 139(May), 62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2018.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brinegar, C., & Goundan, S. (1993). Isolation and characterization of Chenopodin, the 11S seed storage protein of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 41(2), 182–185.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00026a006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brito, I. L., de Souza, E. L., Felex, S. S. S., Madruga, M. S., Yamashita, F., & Magnani, M. (2015). Nutritional and sensory characteristics of gluten-free quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd)-based cookies development using an experimental mixture design. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(9), 5866–5873.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-014-1659-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, K., & Submitted, T. (2000). The drying of foods using supercritical carbon dioxide.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9794-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cappa, C., Lucisano, M., Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V., & Mariotti, M. (2016). Physical and structural changes induced by high pressure on corn starch, rice flour and waxy rice flour. Food Research International, 85, 95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2016.04.018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cocozza, C., Pulvento, C., Lavini, A., Riccardi, M., d’Andria, R., & Tognetti, R. (2013). Effects of increasing salinity stress and decreasing water availability on ecophysiological traits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) grown in a mediterranean-type agroecosystem. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 199(4), 229–240.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eliasson, A.-C. (1994). Interactions between starch and lipids studied by DSC. Thermochimica Acta, 246(2), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eliasson, A. -C., & Ljunger, G. (1988). Interactions between amylopectin and lipid additives during retrogradation in a model system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 44(4), 353–361.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740440408.
  15. Englyst, K. N., Englyst, H. N., Hudson, G. J., Cole, T. J., & Cummings, J. H. (1999). Rapidly available glucose in foods: An in vitro measurement that reflects the glycemic response. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 69(3), 448–454.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3803(20020701)46:4<240::AID-FOOD240>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Englyst, K. N., Hudson, G. J., & Englyst, H. N. (2006). Starch analysis in food. Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318.a1029.
  17. Filho, A. M. M., Pirozi, M. R., Borges, J. T. D. S., Pinheiro Sant’Ana, H. M., Chaves, J. B. P., & Coimbra, J. S. D. R. (2017). Quinoa: Nutritional, functional, and antinutritional aspects. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(8), 1618–1630.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.1001811.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Föste, M., Nordlohne, S. D., Elgeti, D., Linden, M. H., Heinz, V., Jekle, M., & Becker, T. (2014). Impact of quinoa bran on gluten-free dough and bread characteristics. European Food Research and Technology, 239(5), 767–775.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-014-2269-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibson, T. S., Solah, V. A., & McCleary, B. V. (1997). A procedure to measure amylose in cereal starches and flours with concanavalin a. Journal of Cereal Science, 25(2), 111–119.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Joshi, A. U., Liu, C., & Sathe, S. K. (2015). Functional properties of select seed flours. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 60(1), 325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.08.038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kang, S. W., Rahman, M. S., Kim, A. N., Lee, K. Y., Park, C. Y., Kerr, W. L., & Choi, S. G. (2017). Comparative study of the quality characteristics of defatted soy flour treated by supercritical carbon dioxide and organic solvent. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(8), 2485–2493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2691-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaushal, P., Kumar, V., & Sharma, H. K. (2012). Comparative study of physicochemical, functional, antinutritional and pasting properties of taro (Colocasia esculenta), rice (Oryza sativa) flour, pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) flour and their blends. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 48(1), 59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.02.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koziol, M. J. (1992). Chemical composition and nutritional evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 5(1), 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koziol, M. J. (1993). Quinoa: A potencial new oil crop. In J. Janick & J. E. Simon (Eds.), New crops (pp. 328–336). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Li, G., & Zhu, F. (2017a). Amylopectin molecular structure in relation to physicochemical properties of quinoa starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 164, 396–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li, G., & Zhu, F. (2017b). Molecular structure of quinoa starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 158, 124–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, G., & Zhu, F. (2017c). Physicochemical properties of quinoa flour as affected by starch interactions. Food Chemistry, 221, 1560–1568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Li, G., & Zhu, F. (2018). Quinoa starch: Structure, properties, and applications. Carbohydrate Polymers, 181(September 2017), 851–861.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.067.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li, G., Wang, S., & Zhu, F. (2016). Physicochemical properties of quinoa starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 137, 328–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.064.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lijuan, S., Guiying, Z., Guoan, Z., & Zaigui, L. (2007). Effects of different milling methods on flour quality and performance in steamed breadmaking. Journal of Cereal Science, 45(1), 18–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2006.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mufari, J. R., Miranda-Villa, P. P., & Calandri, E. L. (2018). Quinoa germ and starch separation by wet milling, performance and characterization of the fractions. LWT, 96(June), 527–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2000). Natural extracts using supercritical carbon dioxide. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  33. Ng, S. C., Anderson, A., Coker, J., & Ondrus, M. (2006). Characterization of lipid oxidation products in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Food Chemistry, 101(1), 185–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, S. C., Eller, F. J., Fanta, G. F., Felker, F. C., & Shogren, R. L. (2008). Comparison of the effects of critical fluid and reflux-extracted techniques on cornstarch pasting properties. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(1), 74–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Repo-Carrasco, R., Espinoza, C., & Jacobsen, S. E. (2003). Nutritional value and use of the andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International, 19(1–2), 179–189.  https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ronda, F., & Roos, Y. H. (2008). Gelatinization and freeze-concentration effects on recrystallization in corn and potato starch gels. Carbohydrate Research, 343(5), 903–911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Russin, T. A., Boye, J. I., Arcand, Y., & Rajamohamed, S. H. (2011). Alternative techniques for defatting soy: A practical review. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4(2), 200–223.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0367-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schoenlechner, R., Drausinger, J., Ottenschlaeger, V., Jurackova, K., & Berghofer, E. (2010). Functional properties of gluten-free pasta produced from Amaranth, quinoa and buckwheat. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 65(4), 339–349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-010-0194-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sibakov, J. K., Kirjoranta, S. J., Alam, S. A., Kokkonen, H., Jurvelin, J. S., Jouppila, K., Poutanen, K. S., & Sozer, N. (2015). Effect of oat bran fractions on Extrudates made of defatted oats. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 8(2), 445–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-014-1425-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Srichuwong, S., Curti, D., Austin, S., King, R., Lamothe, L., & Gloria-Hernandez, H. (2017). Physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of whole grain sorghums, millet, quinoa and amaranth flours, as affected by starch and non-starch constituents. Food Chemistry, 233, 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang, H., Watanabe, K., & Mitsunaga, T. (2002). Characterization of storage starches from quinoa, barley and adzuki seeds. Carbohydrate Polymers, 49(1), 13–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(01)00292-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Temelli, F., Stobbe, K., Rezaei, K., & Vasanthan, T. (2013). Tocol composition and supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of lipids from barley pearling flour. Journal of Food Science, 78(11), C1643–C1650.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Turkut, G. M., Cakmak, H., Kumcuoglu, S., & Tavman, S. (2016). Effect of quinoa flour on gluten-free bread batter rheology and bread quality. Journal of Cereal Science, 69, 174–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.03.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vasanthan, T., & Hoover, R. (1992). Effect of physical modification on starch structure and physicochemical properties. Food Chemistry, 45, 337–347. Retrieved from http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107415324A009.
  45. Vega-Gálvez, A., Miranda, M., Vergara, J., Uribe, E., Puente, L., & Martínez, E. A. (2010). Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90(15), 2541–2547.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Walters, M., Lima Ribeiro, A. P., Hosseinian, F., & Tsopmo, A. (2018). Phenolic acids, avenanthramides, and antioxidant activity of oats defatted with hexane or supercritical fluid. Journal of Cereal Science, 79, 21–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang, S., & Zhu, F. (2016). Formulation and quality attributes of quinoa food products. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 9(1), 49–68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-015-1584-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wejnerowska, G., & Ciaciuch, A. (2018). Optimisation of Oil Extraction from Quinoa Seeds with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide with Co-solvents. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 36(1), 81–87.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M705669200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ye, J., Hu, X., Luo, S., McClements, D. J., Liang, L., & Liu, C. (2018). Effect of endogenous proteins and lipids on starch digestibility in rice flour. Food Research International, 106(January), 404–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang, Y., Hu, M. H., Zhu, K., Wu, G., & Tan, L. (2018). Functional properties and utilization of Artocarpus heterophyllus lam seed starch from new species in China. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 107(Pt B), 1395–1405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering, Food Technology, College of Agricultural and Forestry EngineeringUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology and Food Science (Chemical Engineering Section), Faculty of SciencesUniversity of BurgosBurgosSpain

Personalised recommendations