Development of a Novel Milk Processing to Produce Yogurt with Improved Quality

  • Priscilla Vásquez-Mazo
  • Analía García Loredo
  • Mariana Ferrario
  • Sandra GuerreroEmail author
Original Paper


In this study, a thermal treatment (T, 85 °C) assisted by short-wave ultraviolet C light (UV-C, 1060 mJ/cm2) under vacuum conditions (400 mmHg) (TV-UVC) is proposed for milk processing, intended to improve some yogurt quality aspects during refrigerated storage (4 °C). In addition, thermal treatment (T) and UV-C light assisted by T without using vacuum (T-UVC) were evaluated for comparison purposes. The TV-UVC treatment was the most effective one, eliminating coliforms and effectively reducing mesophilic counts (4 log-reductions). The effect of the proposed TV-UVC treatment on physicochemical properties, texture, and sensory characteristics of yogurt was studied during storage. TV-UVC yogurt showed 60% less syneresis and highest white index, while exhibiting similar mechanical properties compared to T yogurt during 21-day refrigerated storage. Non-significant changes among all treatments were determined on all evaluated physicochemical parameters during storage (soluble solids, pH, and titratable acidity). Cluster analysis revealed that a group of consumers was very interested in the product; however, some improvements in vanilla and sour taste should be introduced in order to increase overall acceptability. These results suggest that UV-C light assisted by heat and vacuum would represent a promissory alternative for milk processing aimed at yogurt manufacturing.


Ultraviolet light Thermal treatment Vacuum Milk Yogurt 



The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBACYT 2017-2020 Project) and ANPCyT of Argentina and from Banco InterAmericano de Desarrollo (BID) (2015-0401 Project).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abdul Karim Shah, N. N., Shamsudin, R., Abdul Rahman, R., & Adzahan, N. M. (2016). Fruit juice production using ultraviolet pasteurization: A review. Beverages, 2, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC. (2006). Official methods of analysis of AOAC international (17th ed.). Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Analytical Communities.Google Scholar
  3. Barbosa-Canovas, G., & Bermudez-Aguirre, D. (2010). Other novel milk preservation technologies: Ultrasound, irradiation, microwave, radio frequency, ohmic heating, ultraviolet light and bacteriocins. Improving the safety and quality of milk. Volume 1: Milk production and processing, 420-450.Google Scholar
  4. Bourne, M. (2002). Food texture and viscosity: Concept and measurement. London: London Academic press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caminiti, I., Noci, F., Morgan, D., Cronin, D., & Lyng, J. (2012). The effect of pulsed electric fields, ultraviolet light or high intensity light pulses in combination with manothermosonication on selected physico-chemical and sensory attributes of an orange and carrot juice blend. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 90(3), 442–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cilliers, F. P., Gouws, P. A., Koutchma, T., Engelbrecht, Y., Adriaanse, C., & Swart, P. (2014). A microbiological, biochemical and sensory characterisation of bovine milk treated by heat and ultraviolet (UV) light for manufacturing Cheddar cheese. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 23, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Domagała, J. (2009). Instrumental texture, syneresis and microstructure of yoghurts prepared from goat, cow and sheep milk. International Journal of Food Properties, 12(3), 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferrario, M., Alzamora, S. M. y Guerrero, S. (2011). Use of modified Gompertz and Weibullian model to characterize microbial inactivation in orange juice processed with ultraviolet light and natural antimicrobials. In Proceedings of VIII Congreso Iberoamericano de Ingeniería de Alimentos (CIBIA).Google Scholar
  9. Ferrario, M., Schenk, M., García Carrillo, M., & Guerrero, S. (2018). Development and quality assessment of a turbid carrot-orange juice blend processed by UV-C light assisted by mild heat and addition of Yerba Mate (Ilex paraguariensis) extract. Food Chemistry, 269, 567–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Carrillo, M., Ferrario, M., & Guerrero, S. (2018). Effectiveness of UV-C light assisted by mild heat on Saccharomyces cerevisiae KE 162 inactivation in carrot-orange juice blend studied by flow cytometry and transmission electron microscopy. Food Microbiology, 73, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guerrero, S., Ferrario, M., Schenk, M., & García Carrillo, M. (2017). Hurdle technology using ultrasound for food preservation. In A. B. Aguirre (Ed.), Ultrasound: Advances for food processing and preservation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Guerrero-Beltran, J. A., & Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. (2004). Advantages and limitations on processing foods by UV light. Food Science and Technoligy International, 10(3), 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guinee, T. P., Mullins, C. G., Reville, W. J., & Cotter, M. P. (1995). Physical properties of stirred-curd unsweetened yoghurts stabilised with different dairy ingredients. Milchwissenschaft, 50, 196–200.Google Scholar
  14. ISO, I.O.F.S. (1988). Sensory analysis: General guidance for the design of test rooms, International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
  15. Kaya, Z., Yıldız, S., & Ünlütürk, S. (2015). Effect of UV-C irradiation and heat treatment on the shelf life stability of a lemon–melon juice blend: Multivariate statistical approach. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 39, 230–239.Google Scholar
  16. Koutchma, T. (2009). Advances in ultraviolet light technology for non-thermal processing of liquid foods. Food and Bioprocess Technology An International Journal, 2, 138–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lawless, H. (2013a). Product optimization, just-about-right (JAR) scales, and ideal profiling. In H. Lawless (Ed.), Quantitative sensory analysis. Psy-chophysics, models and intelligent design. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawless, H. (2013b). Segmentation. In H. Lawless (Ed.), Quantitative sensory analysis. Psy-chophysics, models and intelligent design. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawless, H. T., & Heymann, H. (2010). Consumer field tests and questionnaire design. In H. T. Lawless & H. Heymann (Eds.), Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. Springer New York: New York, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lucey, J. A. (2001). The relationship between rheological parameters and whey separation in milk gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 15(4-6), 603–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Matak, K. E., Churey, J. J., Worobo, R. W., Sumner, S. S., Hovingh, E., Hackney, C. R., & Pierson, M. D. (2005). Efficacy of UV light for the reduction of Listeria monocytogenes in goat’s milk. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 2212–2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milly, P. J., Toledo, R. T., Chen, J., & Kazem, B. (2007). Hydrodynamic cavitation to improve bulk fluid to surface mass transfer in a nonimmersed ultraviolet system for minimal processing of opaque and transparent fluid foods. Journal of Food Science, 72, 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orlowska, M., Koutchma, T., Grapperhaus, M., Gallagher, J., Schaefer, R., & Defelice, C. (2012). Continuous and pulsed ultraviolet light for nonthermal treatment of liquid foods. Part 1: Effects on quality of fructose solution, apple juice, and milk. Food and Bioprocess Technology An International Journal, 6, 1580–1592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rahn, R. (1997). Potassium iodide as a chemical actinometer for 254 nm radiation: Use of lodate as an electron scavenger. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 66, 450–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reinemann, D. J., Gouw, P., Cilliers, T., Houck, K., & Bishop, J. R. (2006). New methods for UV treatment of milk for improved food safety and product quality. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineerings, 066088.Google Scholar
  26. Sandoval-Castilla, O., Lobato-Calleros, C., Aguirre-Mandujano, A., & Vernon-Carter, E. J. (2004). Microstructure and texture of yogurt as influenced by fat replacers. International Dairy Journal, 14, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Soukoulis, C., Panagiotidis, P., Koureli, R., & Tzia, C. (2007). Industrial yogurt manufacture: Monitoring of fermentation process and improvement of final product quality. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(6), 2641–2654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, H., Livingston, K. A., Fox, C. S., Meigs, J. B., & Jacques, P. F. (2013). Yogurt consumption is associated with better diet quality and metabolic profile in American men and women. Nutrition Research, 33(1), 18–26.Google Scholar
  29. Wehr, H. M. (2004). Standard methods for the examination of dairy products. San Francisco, CA, USA: Ignatius Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeom, H. W., Evrendilek, G. A., Jin, Z. T., & Zhang, Q. H. (2004). Processing of yogurt‐based products with pulsed electric fields: microbial, sensory and physical evaluations. Journal of food processing and preservation, 28(3), 161–178.Google Scholar
  31. Zhu, K., Kanu, P. J., Claver, I. P., Zhu, K., Qian, H., & Zhou, H. (2009). A method for evaluating Hunter whiteness of mixed powders. Advanced Powder Technology, 20(2), 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priscilla Vásquez-Mazo
    • 1
  • Analía García Loredo
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mariana Ferrario
    • 1
    • 3
  • Sandra Guerrero
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Departamento de Industrias, FCEN, UBACABAArgentina
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Alimentos, Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad Nacional de Mar del PlataMar del PlataArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto de Tecnología de Alimentos y Procesos Químicos (ITAPROQ)CONICET – Universidad de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations