Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Pelvic Floor Disorders
Purpose of Review
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools that are widely used by clinicians and researchers across different medical specialties. In this review, we examine the use of PROMs in the evaluation of female pelvic floor disorders (PFD).
PROM development in the assessment of urinary incontinence is more advanced than other pelvic disorders. Work is ongoing in the scientific community to improve currently available measures and create new robust tools where needed.
Hundreds of PROMs are available for use in the evaluation of PFD, some more rigorously validated than others. They are used to screen for diseases, evaluate their impact on quality of life, determine the results of treatment, and measure patient’s satisfaction with treatment. Careful consideration is required to choose the appropriate PROMs to care for a patient or include in a research study. The topic was reviewed in the Textbook of Female Urology and Urogynecology published in 2017. We reviewed recent literature (2015–2018) on the topic and summarized our findings.
KeywordsPelvic floor disorders Patient-reported outcomes Female sexual dysfunction Urge incontinence Fecal incontinence Pelvic organ prolapse
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Engy Habashy and Ayman E. Mahdy each declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 4.Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000258615.42478.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Coyne K, Sexton C. Patient-reported outcomes: from development to utilization. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Fourth ed. Boca Raton: CRC press/ Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.Google Scholar
- 11.Hatzichristou D, Kirana PS, Banner L, Althof SE, Lonnee-Hoffmann RA, Dennerstein L, et al. Diagnosing sexual dysfunction in men and women: sexual history taking and the role of symptom scales and questionnaires. J Sex Med. 2016;13(8):1166–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.• Domoney C, Symonds T. Questionnaires to assess sexual function. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Fourth ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. Updated review of questionnaires assessing sexual function. Google Scholar
- 15.Li-Yun-Fong RJ, Larouche M, Hyakutake M, Koenig N, Lovatt C, Geoffrion R, et al. Is pelvic floor dysfunction an independent threat to sexual function? A cross-sectional study in women with pelvic floor dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2017;14(2):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.11.323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Flynn KE, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, et al. Sexual satisfaction and the importance of sexual health to quality of life throughout the life course of U.S. adults. J Sex Med. 2016;13(11):1642–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.08.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.• Cotterill N, Abrams P. International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Fourth ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. Evolution and detailed review of the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire. Google Scholar
- 21.Yearwood Martin C, Murphy C, Cotterill N, Williams S, Cottenden A, Fader M. Development and psychometric evaluation of ICIQ-PadPROM: a quality of life questionnaire to assess the treatment effect of absorbent continence products. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1650–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23389.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.• Mohamed S, Chatoor D, Williams A. Questionnaires to assess bowel function. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Fourth ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. Review of questionnaires used to assess bowel function. Google Scholar
- 26.Cotterill N, Norton C, Avery KN, Abrams P, Donovan JL. Psychometric evaluation of a new patient-completed questionnaire for evaluating anal incontinence symptoms and impact on quality of life: the ICIQ-B. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1235–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182272128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Bordeianou L, Hicks CW, Olariu A, Savitt L, Pulliam SJ, Weinstein M, et al. Effect of coexisting pelvic floor disorders on fecal incontinence quality of life scores: a prospective, survey-based study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(11):1091–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.• Disgesu A. Questionnaires to assess pelvic organ prolapse. In: Cardozo L, Staskin D, editors. Textbook of female urology and urogynecology. Fourth ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. Review of questionnaires currently available to assess patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Google Scholar
- 33.Bradley CS, Nygaard IE. Vaginal wall descensus and pelvic floor symptoms in older women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(4):759–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000180183.03897.72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar