Advertisement

Vaginal Mesh for Urinary Incontinence and Prolapse: Impact on Sexual Function

  • Nicole M. SzellEmail author
  • Jacquelyn Booher
  • Todd Campbell
Urology, Gynecology, and Endocrinology (J Simon and M Luria, Section Editors)
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Urology, Gynecology, and Endocrinology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The evolution of vaginal mesh has had a large positive impact on quality of life for patients with stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse; for instance, the mid-urethral sling is considered the gold standard treatment for stress incontinence. There are unique side effects, however, for the use of mesh in surgical implantation, including infection, erosion, extrusion, and changes in urinary habits as well.

Recent Findings

A side effect that may be overlooked in these women undergoing vaginal mesh surgery is sexual dysfunction; while the surgery itself may strongly improve quality of life, there can be some detrimental sexual side effects that may hinder the patient’s quality of life or sexual function overall. Changes in sexual function can be encountered in anywhere from 5 to 20% of all women undergoing surgery for stress incontinence or vaginal prolapse, and the scope of these changes vary from positive to negative. These changes can be broken down by sub-topics explored in the FSFI including dyspareunia or pain, overall function, lubrication, and orgasm.

Summary

Sexual function is an often overlooked and underdiscussed topic in the medical field and between clinicians and patients overall. It is imperative that clinicians discuss any and all possible complications of mesh surgery with patients preoperatively, including any effects, both positive and negative, in regard to sexual function.

Keywords

Mesh implant Pelvic organ prolapse Stress incontinence Vaginal mesh Prolapse repair Mesh sling 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Nicole Szell, Jacquelyn Booher, and Todd Campbell each declares that they have no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    El-Enen MA, Ragb M, Gamasy AE-NE, El-Ashry O, El-Sharaby M, Elbadawy A, et al. Sexual function among women with stress incontinence after using transobturator vaginal tape, and its correlation with patient’s expectations. BJU Int. 2009;104:1118–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell MF, Walsh PC, Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR. Campbell Walsh-urology. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2016.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Gupta P, Payne J, Killinger KA, Ehlert M, Bartley J, Gilleran J, et al. Analysis of changes in sexual function in women undergoing pelvic organ prolapse repair with abdominal or vaginal approaches. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1919–24 This article was particularly interesting because it included a group of women undergoing transabdominal (robotic) sacrocolpopexy; while the mesh was not placed within the vagina itself it was incorporated into the pelvic floor and remained attached to the vaginal cuff. As this robotically assisted procedure becomes more prevalent, additional studies will need to be completed to determine the effects of sexual function, dyspareunia, orgasm, and lubrication postoperatively. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taneja SS. Complications of urologic surgery prevention and management. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2010.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Urogynecology surgical mesh implants-FDA's role and activities. In: US Food and Drug Administrative Home https://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/products&medicalprocedures/implants&prosthetics/urogynecologicsurgicalmesh/UCM262S01.htm. Accessed 1 Sep 2018.
  6. 6.
    AUA Position Statement on the Use of Vaginal Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). In: American Urological Association - AUA Position Statement on the Use of Vaginal Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). http://www.auanet.org/guidelines/use-of-vaginal-mesh-for-the-surgical-treatment-of-stress-urinary-incontinence. Accessed 1 Sep 2018.
  7. 7.
    Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leib S. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex & Marital Ther. 2000;26:191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003;14:164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    • Szell N, Hartzell R, Cohen D, Goldstein S, Gonzalez J, Goldstein I (2015) Pd40–05 sub-urethral sling surgery for stress incontinence may result in orgasmic dysfunction through direct injury to anterior vaginal wall, peri-urethral prostatic tissue. J Urol. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2439. This article is of importance because it is one of the first articles to summarize the effects mesh placement has on female orgasm. Orgasm is complex and multi-factorial and this article demonstrates it is important to determine the type of orgasm a woman experiences for pre-procedural counseling. This article can lead to future research exploring if orgasm is directly correlated to improvement in sexual satisfaction.
  10. 10.
    Gray T, Li W, Campbell P, Jha S, Radley S. Evaluation of coital incontinence by electronic questionnaire: prevalence, associations and outcomes in women attending a urogynaecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;29:969–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naumann G, Steetskamp J, Meyer M, Laterza R, Skala C, Albrich S, et al. Changes in sexual function and quality of life after single-incision mid-urethral sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;168:231–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simsek A, Ozgor F, Yuksel B, Kucuktopcu O, Kirecci S, Toptas M, et al. Female sexual function after transobturator tape in women with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence. SpringerPlus. 2014;3:570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Filocamo MT, Serati M, Frumenzio E, Marzi VL, Cattoni E, Champagne A, et al. The impact of mid-urethral slings for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence on female sexual function: a multicenter prospective study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:2002–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mollaioli D, Di S, Limoncin E, et al (2018) Validation of an adapted version of visual analogue scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: the Orgasmometer-females v1 (protocols.Io.mk9c4z6). Protocolsio. doi:  https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.mk9c4z6.
  15. 15.
    Jannini EA, Buisson O, Rubio-Casillas A. Beyond the G-spot: clitourethrovaginal complex anatomy in female orgasm. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11:531–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caruso S, Rugolo S, Bandiera S, Mirabella D, Cavallaro A, Cianci A. Clitoral blood flow changes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: pilot study on TVT versus TOT procedures. Urology. 2007;70:554–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    •• Arslan B, Onuk O, Eroglu A, Gezmis TC, Aydın M. Female sexual function following a novel transobturator sling procedure without paraurethral dissection (modified-TOT). Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43:142–9 This study was of interest because it showed a statistically significant change in orgasm using the modified technique, in which no anterior vaginal wall dissection was performed. The anterior vaginal wall and periurethral space are thought to be involved with vaginal orgasm. Future research can focus specifically comparing the effects of vaginal orgasm based upon surgeries with anterior vaginal wall dissection and mesh placement/mesh placement without dissection/ no mesh placement or dissection. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alwaal A, Tian X, Huang Y, Zhao L, Ma L, Lin G, et al. Female sexual function following mid-urethral slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Impot Res. 2016;28:121–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tuncer M, Tarhan F, Kafkasli A, Demir K, Yucetas U, Faydaci G, et al. The effects of stress incontinence surgery on sexual function and life quality of women. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2016;88:106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang C-L, Long C-Y, Juan Y-S, Liu C-M, Hsu C-S. Impact of total vaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse on female sexual function. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011;115:167–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Long CY, Juan YS, Wu MP, Liu CM, Chiang PH, Tsai EM. Changes in female sexual function following anterior with and without posterior vaginal mesh surgery for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2167–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Farthmann J, Mengel M, Henne B, Grebe M, Watermann D, Kaufhold J, et al. Improvement of pelvic floor-related quality of life and sexual function after vaginal mesh implantation for cystocele: primary endpoint of a prospective multicentre trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294:115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hoda M, Wagner S, Greco F, Heynemann H, Fornara P. Prospective follow-up of female sexual function after vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using Transobturator mesh implants. J Sex Med. 2011;8:914–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim SR, Moon YJ, Kim SK, Bai SW. Changes in sexual function and comparison of questionnaires following surgery for pielvic organ prolapse. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55:170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Laso-García IM, Rodríguez-Cabello MA, Jiménez-Cidre MA, Orosa-Andrada A, Carracedo-Calvo D, López-Fando L, et al. Prospective long-term results, complications and risk factors in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with vaginal mesh. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;211:62–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Funk MJ, Levin PJ, Wu JM. Trends in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:845–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levin R (2005) The physiology and pathophysiology of the female orgasm. Womens Sexual Funct Dysfunct 228–235.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pastor Z, Chmel R. Differential diagnostics of female “sexual” fluids: a narrative review. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;29:621–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Preti G, Huggins GR, Silverberg GD. Alterations in the organic compounds of vaginal secretions caused by sexual arousal**supported in part by Rockefeller Foundation Grant RF-72018 and National Science Foundation Grants BMS 75013164 and GB-34879.††presented at the thirty-fourth annual meeting of the American fertility society, march 29 to April 1, 1978, New Orleans, La. Fertil Steril. 1979;32:47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Owen DH, Katz DF. A vaginal fluid simulant. Contraception. 1999;59:91–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dursun M, Otunctemur A, Ozbek E, Cakir SS, Polat EC. Impact of the transobturator tape procedure on sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2012;39:831–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ko YH, Song C-H, Choi JW, Jung HC, Song PH. Effect on sexual function of patients and patients spouses after Midurethral sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective single center study. LUTS: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. 2015;8:182–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicole M. Szell
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jacquelyn Booher
    • 3
  • Todd Campbell
    • 3
  1. 1.Advanced Urology InstituteClearwaterUSA
  2. 2.Michigan State University College of Osteopathic MedicineMadison HeightsUSA
  3. 3.St. John Providence Urologic SurgeryMichigan State University College of Osteopathic MedicineMadison HeightsUSA

Personalised recommendations