Female Cosmetic Genital Reconstruction: a Review of Current Trends, Treatments, and Techniques
Purpose of Review
To examine the peer-reviewed publications on the topic of female cosmetic genital surgery (FCGS) and discuss recent trends, the factors motivating patients to request these procedures, and the controversy surrounding them.
In studies with the primary goal being esthetic improvement (e.g., labiaplasty), post-operative satisfaction rates are generally high. When procedure outcomes are focused more on functional aspects, such as enhancement of sexual function and response, statistically significant improvements are also reported after treatment. Complication rates vary across treatment sites and operating physicians.
While FCGS procedures continue to rise, great variation still exists across patient-centered outcomes, treatment modalities offered, and quality of published studies examining outcomes. Small sample sizes and lack of standardization across study centers make scientifically validating existing data challenging. Consensus across disciplines pertaining to standardization of procedures and outcomes is necessary to optimize patient satisfaction, care, and safety.
KeywordsMinimally invasive treatments for vaginal dryness Female genital cosmetic surgery Labiaplasty Minimally invasive treatments for vaginal laxity Non-surgical vaginal tightening Vaginal rejuvenation Radiofrequency treatments for vaginal laxity
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Hamori C, Banwell P, Alinsod RM. Female cosmetic genital surgery, concepts, classification and techniques. Stuttgart: Thieme Medical Publishers; 2017.Google Scholar
- 3.The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. Available at: https://surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2017.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2018.
- 4.The American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics. https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2016.pdf. Accessed July 11, 2018.
- 5.Australian Government Department of Human Services. Medicare item reports. http://medicarestatistics.humanservices.gov.au/statistics/mbs_item.jsp. Accessed July 11, 2018.
- 6.British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. Aesthetic genital surgery: female genital aesthetic surgery (aesthetic genital surgery, designer vaginas). London. http://www.baaps.org.uk/procedures/aesthetic-genital-surgery. Accessed July 11, 2018.
- 7.Harris V, Dickison P, Lim A, Fischer G. Vulvo-vaginal rejuvenation: fact or fiction? Fractional carbon dioxide laser for genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Aust J Dermatol. 2018;59:341–3.Google Scholar
- 13.Clerico C, Lari A, Mojallal A, Boucher F. Anatomy and aesthetics of the labia minora: the ideal vulva? Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):720.Google Scholar
- 16.• Sharp G, Tiggemann M, Mattiske J. Factors that influence the decision to undergo labiaplasty: media, relationships, and psychological well-being. Aesthet Surg J. 2016;36(4):469–78 This recent study suggests that women seeking labiaplasty are more likely to have seen online images of female genitalia. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.• Mazloomdoost D, Crisp CC, Westermann LB, Benbouajili JM, Kleeman SD, Pauls RN. Survey of male perceptions regarding the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):731.e1–9 This study showed that the majority of men surveyed would not want their female partner to change her genital appearance. Google Scholar
- 25.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Gynecological Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 378: Vaginal “rejuvenation” and cosmetic vaginal procedures. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;100:737–8.Google Scholar
- 26.• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Adolescent Health Care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 662: Breast and labial surgery in adolescents. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127:e138–40 This professional committee opinion shifts a prior stance against labial surgery to one of acceptance given conditional indications. Google Scholar
- 27.Clerico C, Lari A, Mojallal A, Boucher F. Anatomy and aesthetics of the labia minora: the ideal vulva? Aesthet Plast Surg. 2017;41(3):714–9.Google Scholar
- 37.Gress S. Composite reduction labiaplasty. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2013;37:674–83.Google Scholar
- 41.Ulubay M, Keskin U, Fidan U, et al. Safety, efficiency, and outcomes of perineoplasty: treatment of the sensation of a wide vagina. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:2495105.Google Scholar
- 49.• Krychman M, Rowan CG, Allan BB, et al. Effect of single-treatment, surface-cooled radiofrequency therapy on vaginal laxity and female sexual function: the VIVEVE I randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2017;14(2):215–25 This is a randomized control trial showed improvement in sexual function for women treated with intravaginal radiofrequency therapy. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Sekiguchi Y, Utsugisawa Y, Azekosi Y, Kinjo M, Song M, Kubota Y, et al. Laxity of the vaginal introitus after childbirth: nonsurgical outpatient procedure for vaginal tissue restoration and improved sexual satisfaction using low-energy radiofrequency thermal therapy. J Women’s Health (Larchmt). 2013;22(9):775–81.Google Scholar
- 52.•• Blaganje M, Šćepanović D, Žgur L, Verdenik I, Pajk F, Lukanović A. Non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy effect on stress urinary incontinence related to quality of life and sexual function: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:153–8 This randomized control trial demonstrates a statistically significant improvement of stress urinary incontinence in women treated with laser compared to sham. PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.The U.S. Federal and Drug Administration. FDA warns against use of energy-based devices to perform vaginal ‘rejuvenation’ or vaginal cosmetic procedures: FDA safety communication https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/ucm615013.htm Accessed July 13, 2018.
- 62.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 119. Female sexual dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):996–1007.Google Scholar
- 67.Berman L, Windecker MA. The relationship between women’s genital self-image and female sexual function: a national survey. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2008;5:199–207.Google Scholar