Advertisement

Pornography Use in Adult Mixed-Sex Romantic Relationships: Context and Correlates

  • Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-MorelEmail author
  • Marie-Ève Daspe
  • Véronique Charbonneau-Lefebvre
  • Myriam Bosisio
  • Sophie Bergeron
Clinical Therapeutics (B McCarthy and R Segraves, Section Editors)
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Clinical Therapeutics
  2. Topical Collection on Clinical Therapeutics

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Pornography use is a common sexual activity for men and women engaged in a romantic relationship. The objective of this literature review was to highlight the current state of research on the associations between pornography use and relational and sexual well-being in mixed-sex couples, with a particular focus on the context of use.

Recent Findings

Overall, findings are mixed, and studies are plagued by methodological shortcomings precluding causal assertions. Nevertheless, research indicates that men’s pornography use is negatively associated with relational well-being and sexual satisfaction, whereas women’s use is unrelated to relational indicators and unrelated to, or positively associated with, sexual satisfaction. The context in which pornography is used (e.g., alone or with the partner) moderates these associations.

Summary

This review suggests that pornography use may be positively related, negatively related, or unrelated to couples’ well-being. The sex of the user and the context of use may in part explain this variability in correlates of pornography use.

Keywords

Pornography Romantic relationship Context of use Sexual well-being Relationship well-being 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) awarded to Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Cooper A. Sexuality and the Internet: surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychol Behav. 1998;1:187–93.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ropelato J. Internet pornography Statistics 2007. http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/IFR2013.pdf. Retrieved on January 17th, 2019.
  3. 3.
    Montgomery-Graham S, Kohut T, Fisher W, Campbell L. How the popular media rushes to judgment about pornography and relationships while research lags behind. Can J Hum Sex. 2015;24(3):243–56.  https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.243-A4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    • Balzarini RN, Dobson K, Chin K, Campbell L. Does exposure to erotica reduce attraction and love for romantic partners in men? Independent replications of Kenrick, Gutierres, and Goldberg (1989) study 2. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;70:191–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.003 This research includes three experimental studies that examine the associations between being exposed to nude centerfolds, compared to images of abstract art or non-nude photographs, and attractiveness and love for partner. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohut T, Fisher WA, Campbell L. Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;46:585–602.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0783-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Willoughby BJ, Busby DM. In the eye of the beholder: exploring variations in the perceptions of pornography. J Sex Res. 2016;53(6):678–88.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1013601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Steinem G. Erotica and pornography: a clear and present difference. In: Lederer L, editor. Take back the night: women on pornography. New York: William Morrow; 1980. p. 35–9.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson WT. The pornography report: epistemology, methodology and ideology. Duq L Rev. 1971;10:190–219.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohut T, Balzarini RN, Fisher WA, Campbell L. Pornography’s associations with open sexual communication and relationship closeness vary as a function of dyadic patterns of pornography use within heterosexual relationships. J Soc Pers Relat. 2018;35(4):655–76.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Redouté J, Stoléru S, Grégoire M-C, Costes N, Cinotti L, Lavenne F, et al. Brain processing of visual sexual stimuli in human males. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;11:162–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minarcik J, Wetterneck CT, Short MB. The effects of sexually explicit material use on romantic relationship dynamics. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(4):700–7.  https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veit M, Štulhofer A, Hald GM. Sexually explicit media use and relationship satisfaction: a moderating role of emotional intimacy? Sex Relation Ther. 2016;32(1):58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2016.1193134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hald GM. Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Arch Sex Behav. 2006;35(5):577–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leonhardt ND, Spencer TJ, Butler MH, Theobald AC. An organizational framework for sexual media’s influence on short-term versus long-term sexual quality. Arch Sex Behav 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1209-4.
  15. 15.
    Leonhardt ND, Willoughby BJ. Pornography, provocative sexual media, and their differing associations with multiple aspects of sexual satisfaction. J Soc Pers Relat. 2017;36:618–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517739162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zillmann D. Influence of unrestrained access to erotica on adolescents’ and young adults’ dispositions toward sexuality. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27(S2):41–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Senn C, Radtke H. Women’s evaluations of and affective reactions to mainstream violent pornography, nonviolent erotica and erotica. Violence Vict. 1990;5(3):143–55.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cooper A, Morahan-Martin J, Mathy RM, Maheu M. Toward an increased understanding of user demographics in online sexual activities. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(2):105–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230252851861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grov C, Gillespie BJ, Royce T, Lever J. Perceived consequences of casual online sexual activities on heterosexual relationships: a U.S. online survey. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):429–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9598-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ballester-Arnal R, Castro-Calvo J, Gil-Llario MD, Giménez-García C. Relationship status as an influence on cybersex activity: cybersex, youth, and steady partner. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(5):444–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.772549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wéry A, Billieux J. Problematic cybersex: conceptualization, assessment, and treatment. Addict Behav. 2017;64:238–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kohut T. An empirical investigation of the concept of “pornography”. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 2014;2063. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/2063. Retrieved on January 17th, 2019.
  23. 23.
    Reid RC, Li DS, Gilliland R, Stein JA, Fong T. Reliability, validity, and psychometric development of the pornography consumption inventory in a sample of hypersexual men. J Sex Marital Ther. 2011;37(5):359–85.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.607047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Willoughby BJ, Carroll JS, Busby DM, Brown CC. Differences in pornography use among couples: associations with satisfaction, stability, and relationship processes. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(1):145–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0562-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Wright PJ, Tokunaga RS, Bae S. More than a dalliance? Pornography consumption and extramarital sex attitudes among married U.S. adults. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2014;3(2):97–109.  https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000024 This study examines the directionality of the associations between pornography use and extramarital sex attitudes controlling for sociodemographic variables, general and marital unhappiness, and religiosity. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leonhardt ND, Willoughby BJ. Longitudinal links between pornography use, marital importance, and permissive sexuality during emerging adulthood. Marriage Fam Rev. 2018;54(1):64–84.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2017.1359811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hald GM, Malamuth NM. Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(4):614–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9212-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albright JM. Sex in America online: an exploration of sex, marital status, and sexual identity in internet sex seeking and its impacts. J Sex Res. 2008;45(2):175–86.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490801987481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Buzzell T. Demographic characteristics of persons using pornography in three technological contexts. Sex Cult. 2005;9(1):28–48.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02908761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun C, Bridges A, Johnson JA, Ezzell MB. Pornography and the male sexual script: an analysis of consumption and sexual relations. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(4):983–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0391-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Regnerus M, Gordon D, Price J. Documenting pornography use in America: a comparative analysis of methodological approaches. J Sex Res. 2016;53(7):873–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1096886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Daneback K, Træen B, Månsson S-A. Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(5):746–53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9314-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bridges AJ, Morokoff PJ. Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Pers Relat. 2011;18(4):562–85.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01328.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    • Carroll JS, Busby DM, Willoughby BJ, Brown CC. The porn gap: differences in men’s and women’s pornography patterns in couple relationships. J Couple Relatsh Ther. 2017;16(2):146–63.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2016.1238796 This study examines gender differences in pornography patterns of individuals in heterosexual couple relationships including awareness of the partner’s use, viewing alone or as a couple, and acceptance of pornography. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lambert NM, Negash S, Stillman TF, Olmstead SB, Fincham FD. A love that doesn’t last: pornography consumption and weakened commitment to one’s romantic partner. J Soc Clin Psychol. 2012;31(4):410–38.  https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.4.410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maddox AM, Rhoades GK, Markman HJ. Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: associations with relationship quality. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):441–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9585-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yucel D, Gassanov MA. Exploring actor and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction among married couples. Soc Sci Res. 2010;39(5):725–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Olmstead SB, Negash S, Pasley K, Fincham FD. Emerging adults’ expectations for pornography use in the context of future committed romantic relationships: a qualitative study. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(4):625–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9986-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Poulsen FO, Busby DM, Galovan AM. Pornography use: who uses it and how it is associated with couple outcomes. J Sex Res. 2013;50(1):72–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2011.648027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Szymanski DM, Stewart-Richardson DN. Psychological, relational, and sexual correlates of pornography use on young adult heterosexual men in romantic relationships. J Mens Stud. 2014;22(1):64–82.  https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.2201.64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    •• Muusses LD, Kerkhof P, Finkenauer C. Internet pornography and relationship quality: a longitudinal study of within and between partner effects of adjustment, sexual satisfaction and sexually explicit Internet material among newly-weds. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.077 This study examines the directionality of the associations between pornography use and relationship and sexual satisfaction including partner effects using a three-year prospective design. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Doran K, Price J. Pornography and marriage. J Fam Econ Iss. 2014;35:489–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-014-9391-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wetterneck CT, Burgess AJ, Short MB, Smith AH, Cervantes ME. The role of sexual compulsivity, impulsivity, and experiential avoidance in Internet pornography use. Psychol Rec. 2012;62:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Daspe M-È, Vaillancourt-Morel M-P, Lussier Y, Sabourin S, Ferron A. When pornography use feels out of control: the moderation effect of relationship and sexual satisfaction. J Sex Marital Ther. 2018;44(4):343–53.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2017.1405301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brown CC, Carroll JS, Yorgason JB, Busby DM, Willoughby BJ, Larson JH. A common-fate analysis of pornography acceptance, sse, and sexual satisfaction among heterosexual married couples. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(2):575–84.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0732-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Staley C, Prause N. Erotica viewing effects on intimate relationships and self/partner evaluations. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(4):615–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-0034-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Park BY, Wilson G, Berger J, Christman M, Reina B, Bishop F, et al. Is Internet pornography causing sexual dysfunctions? A review with clinical reports. Behav Sci. 2016;6:17.  https://doi.org/10.3390/bs6030017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mollaioli D, Sansone A, Romanelli F, Jannini EA. Sexual dysfunctions in the Internet era. In: Jannini EA, Siracusano A, editors. Sexual dysfunctions in mentally ill patients. Trends in andrology and sexual medicine. Trends in andrology and sexual medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2018. pp. 163–72.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bergner RM, Bridges AJ. The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: research and clinical implications. J Sex Marital Ther. 2002;28(3):193–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/009262302760328235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schneider JP. Effects of cybersex addiction on the family: results of a survey. Sex Addict Compuls. 2000;7(1–2):31–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160008400206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zitzman ST, Butler MH. Wives’ experience of husbands’ pornography ese and concomitant deception as an attachment threat in the adult pair-bond relationship. Sex Addict Compuls. 2009;16(3):210–40.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160903202679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Stewart DN, Szymanski DM. Young adult women’s reports of their male romantic partner’s pornography use as a correlate of their self-esteem, relationship quality, and sexual satisfaction. Sex Roles. 2012;67(5–6):257–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0164-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Szymanski DM, Feltman CE, Dunn TL. Male partners’ perceived pornography use and women’s relational and psychological health: the roles of trust, attitudes, and investment. Sex Roles. 2015;73(5–6):187–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0518-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tylka TL, Kroon Van Diest AM. You looking at her “hot” body may not be “cool” for me: integrating male partners’ pornography use into objectification theory for women. Psychol Women Q. 2014;39(1):67–84.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314521784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Maas MK, Vasilenko SA, Willoughby BJ. A dyadic approach to pornography use and relationship satisfaction among heterosexual couples: the role of pornography acceptance and anxious attachment. J Sex Res. 2018;55(6):772–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2018.1440281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    •• Perry SL. Does viewing pornography reduce marital quality over time? Evidence from longitudinal date. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(2):549–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0770-y This study examines if pornography use is associated with marital quality six years later. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    • Perry SL, Schleifer C. Till porn do us part? A longitudinal examination of pornography use and divorce. J Sex Res. 2018;55(3):284–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2017.1317709 This study uses three-wave longitudinal data over eight years to examine the association between pornography use and the likelihood of divorce over time. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Resch MN, Alderson KG. Female partners of men who use pornography: are honesty and mutual use associated with relationship satisfaction? J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(5):410–24.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Busby DM, Chiu HY, Olsen JA, Willoughby BJ. Evaluating the dimensionality of pornography. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;46(6):1723–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0983-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marie-Ève Daspe
    • 1
  • Véronique Charbonneau-Lefebvre
    • 1
  • Myriam Bosisio
    • 1
  • Sophie Bergeron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations