Evidence-Based Interventions for Youth Suicide Risk
- 193 Downloads
Purpose of Review
To review and discuss recent advances in evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for youth suicide risk.
There is a growing body of research on the effectiveness of interventions targeting suicidal ideation and behavior among adolescents. Dialectical Behavioral Therapy-Adolescent has shown effectiveness across two independent randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Several other interventions have shown effectiveness in only one trial and are in need of replication. New interventions are also being developed that incorporate developments in technology and adaptive intervention designs. It is recommended that future research focus on strategies for engaging underserved youth with interventions, consider the broader needs of youth living in poverty, and further tailor interventions to subgroups with distinct risk profiles. Limited EBIs exist for preadolescents, despite evidence for an increasing rate of suicidal behavior for these youth.
Several interventions for youth suicide risk are highly promising, but further investigation is necessary. EBIs that are effective for preadolescents are needed, and greater efforts to tailor interventions for distinct subgroups of youth at risk are recommended.
KeywordsSuicide risk Youth Interventions Suicidal thoughts and behaviors
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Danielle R. Busby, Claire Hatkevich, and Taylor C. McGuire each declare no potential conflicts of interest. Cheryl A. King has received consultancy fees from the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention and the National Advisory Mental Health Council, grants from the NIMH, honoraria payments from Florida International University, Duke University, Indiana University School of Medicine, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, West Virginia University, and the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. King has also received book royalties from Guilford Publications and paid travel accommodations from Florida International University, Duke University, Indiana University, Mayo Clinic, West Virginia University, University of Pittsburgh, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and the American Psychiatric Association.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. 2019. www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.
- 2.World Health Organization. Public health action for the prevention of suicide: A framework. 2012.Google Scholar
- 3.Castellví P, Lucas-Romero E, Miranda-Mendizábal A, Parés-Badell O, Almenara J, Alonso I, et al. Longitudinal association between self-injurious thoughts and behaviors and suicidal behavior in adolescents and young adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017;215:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.•• Glenn CR, Esposito EC, Porter AC, Robinson DJ. Evidence-base update of psychosocial treatments for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019. This article provides a comprehensive and systematic review of the evidence to-date regarding psychosocial interventions for youth at elevated risk for suicide attempts and suicide. Google Scholar
- 10.•• McCauley E, Berk MS, Asarnow JR, Adrian M, Cohen J, Korslund K, et al. Efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents at high risk for suicide: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(8):777–85. This efficacy trial demonstrates that dialectical behavior therapy, compared to individual and group supportive therapy, for highly suicidal adolescents was associated with a lower likelihood of suicide attempt and nonsuicidal self-injury at the end of 6-month treatment, although this difference did not persist. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Esposito-Smythers C, Wolff JC, Liu RT, Hunt JI, Adams L, Kim K, et al. Family-focused cognitive behavioral treatment for depressed adolescents in suicidal crisis with co-occurring risk factors: A randomized trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.•• Asarnow JR, Hughes JL, Babeva KN, Sugar CA. Cognitive-behavioral family treatment for suicide attempt prevention: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017;56(6):506–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.03.015. This efficacy trial demonstrates that the Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youths (SAFETY) intervention for adolescents with recent self-harm, which integrates cognitive-behavioral and dialectical behavior therapy components into a family treatment, was associated with a lower probability of suicide attempt than treatment as usual at 3-month follow-up. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.•• King CA, Arango A, Kramer A, Busby DR, Czyz EC, Ewell Foster CJ, et al. Association of the Youth-Nominated Support Team Intervention for Suicidal Adolescents with 11-to 14-year mortality outcomes. Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4358. This examination of the long-term mortality outcomes associated with treatment as usual plus the Youth-Nominated Support Team Intervention (YST), relative to treatment as usual only, indicates that YST was associated with reduced overall mortality and reduced mortality due to suicide or drug overdose with unknown intent. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Diamond GS, Kobak RR, Krauthamer Ewing ES, Levy SA, Herres JL, Russon JM, et al. A randomized controlled trial: Attachment-based family and nondirective supportive treatments for youth who are suicidal. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58(7):721–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cottrell DJ, Wright-Hughes A, Collinson M, Boston P, Eisler I, Fortune S, et al. Effectiveness of systemic family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: A pragmatic, phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(3):203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kennard B, Goldstein T, Foxwell A, McMakin D, Wolfe K, Biernesser C, et al. As safe as possible (ASAP): A brief app-supported inpatient intervention to prevent postdischarge suicidal behavior in hospitalized, suicidal adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(9):864–72. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17101151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.King CA, Ewell Foster C, Rogalski KM. Teen suicide risk: A practitioner guide to screening, assessment, and management. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.Google Scholar
- 33.Oquendo MA, Bongiovi-Garcia ME, GaIfaIvy H, Goldberg PH, Grunebaum MF, Burke AK, et al. Sex differences in clinical predictors of suicidal acts after major depression: A prospective study. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(1):134–41. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.1.134.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Monnin J, Thiemard E, Vandel P, Nicolier M, Tio G, Courtet P, et al. Sociodemographic and psychopathological risk factors in repeated suicide attempts: Gender differences in a prospective study. J Affect Disord. 2012;136(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2011.09.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.U.S. Census Bureau. The Supplemental Poverty Measure: 2017. 2018.Google Scholar
- 45.Pew Research Center. Teens, Social Media, & Technology 2018. In: Internet & Technology 2018. https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.Google Scholar
- 46.National Consumers League. Survey: Majority of 'tweeners' now have cell phones, with many parents concerned about cost. 2012. https://www.nclnet.org/survey_majority_of_tweeners_now_have_cell_phones_with_many_parents_concerned_about_cost. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.Google Scholar
- 47.Influence Central. Kids & tech: The evolution of today’s digital natives. 2016. http://influence-central.com/kids-tech-the-evolution-of-todays-digital-natives/. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.Google Scholar
- 49.• Torous J, Larsen ME, Depp C, Cosco TD, Barnett I, Nock MK, et al. Smartphones, sensors, and machine learning to advance real-time prediction and interventions for suicide prevention: A review of current progress and next steps. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(7):51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y. This article reviews the potential of, and current evidence for, smartphones and other new technologies for understanding, predicting outcomes, and intervening with individuals at risk for suicide. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar