Smartphone-Based Tracking of Sleep in Depression, Anxiety, and Psychotic Disorders

  • Talayeh AledavoodEmail author
  • John Torous
  • Ana Maria Triana Hoyos
  • John A. Naslund
  • Jukka-Pekka Onnela
  • Matcheri Keshavan
Open Access
Sleep Disorders (P Gehrman, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Sleep Disorders


Purpose of Review

Sleep is an important feature in mental illness. Smartphones can be used to assess and monitor sleep, yet there is little prior application of this approach in depressive, anxiety, or psychotic disorders. We review uses of smartphones and wearable devices for sleep research in patients with these conditions.

Recent Findings

To date, most studies consist of pilot evaluations demonstrating feasibility and acceptability of monitoring sleep using smartphones and wearable devices among individuals with psychiatric disorders. Promising findings show early associations between behaviors and sleep parameters and agreement between clinic-based assessments, active smartphone data capture, and passively collected data. Few studies report improvement in sleep or mental health outcomes.


Success of smartphone-based sleep assessments and interventions requires emphasis on promoting long-term adherence, exploring possibilities of adaptive and personalized systems to predict risk/relapse, and determining impact of sleep monitoring on improving patients’ quality of life and clinically meaningful outcomes.


Sleep Psychotic disorders Mental illness Circadian rhythms Smartphones Wearable 


The rapid consumer adoption of smartphones and wearables has increased both the interest in and the feasibility of mobile health across many areas of medicine. In psychiatry, there has been an increased interest in these technologies reflected by both growing research efforts in this area and numerous consumer apps targeting mental health conditions [1•]. While clinical evidence for the effectiveness of many of these apps to aid in the diagnosis, monitoring, and adjunctive treatment of psychiatric conditions is limited and lacking at present, there has been even less focus on the ability of smartphone apps to track and promote positive health behaviors such as sleep among persons living with mental illness. Given the robust literature documenting the important link between sleep and mental health, there is potential for emerging digital technologies to concurrently support the monitoring and tracking of mental health and sleep with the aim of achieving improved health and well-being for individuals living with mental illness.

In this review, we explore the current evidence on the use of smartphones and wearables for tracking and monitoring sleep in persons living with mental illness. Specifically, we seek to summarize the state of the science as it relates to digital interventions for sleep and mental health and consider future research directions. We also discuss the current shortcomings of the literature and propose solutions for using smartphone apps and wearables to monitor sleep in patients with psychiatric disorders.

Sleep and Psychiatric Disorders

Across all psychiatric illnesses, sleep is often both an important clinical symptom and an important therapeutic target [2]. Sleep disturbances are also associated with lower quality of life among patients [3]. Its importance is underscored by the finding that sleep abnormalities in patients with psychiatric diagnoses are associated with increased risk of suicide [4, 5]. Sleep disturbances are usually a marker for diagnosis of mood disorders [4], and they are a risk factor for developing anxiety and depression [6]. Moreover, insomnia can influence the trajectory of depression, affecting the severity, duration, and relapse rates of the disorder [7]. In psychotic disorders, sleep disturbances are commonly associated with the prodromal phase [8] and may be an important early marker of the premorbid phase of the disease [9]. Sleep disturbances are also often one of the earliest signs of relapse and decompensation in psychotic disorders [10]. In addition, obstructive sleep apnea has a high prevalence in mood and psychotic disorders [11, 12] but is often undetected.

Patients with major depressive disorder and schizophrenia are known to have some common sleep architecture abnormalities including increased sleep latency, decreased total sleep time, and decreased sleep efficiency index [13, 14, 15]; furthermore, patients with these diagnoses have lower amplitude slow wave activity (SWA) compared to healthy controls [14]. In addition, positive and negative symptoms for schizophrenia have been correlated with the aforementioned abnormalities. Likewise, sleep abnormalities have been associated with bipolar disorder, including reduction of total sleep time in the mania phase and increase of total sleep time in the depressive phase, decreased rapid eye movement (REM) latency, and increased REM density [16]. Recent research on sleep in psychotic disorders has also produced new data on potential mechanisms of illness. Studies have found that sleep spindles, a feature of stage two non-REM sleep, which may facilitate synaptic plasticity and memory consolidation, are reduced in patients with schizophrenia [17, 18, 19]. Sleep spindle abnormalities are also associated with bipolar disorder [20] and major depressive disorder [21].

Technology for Detecting Sleep Abnormalities: Existing Evidence

Technology has proven valuable for supplementing the assessment of sleep patterns and abnormalities in clinical settings. Polysomnography (PSG), which involves recording the biphysiological characteristics of sleep including brain waves, eye movements, muscle activity, and heart rhythm during sleep, is considered a gold standard for detecting sleep abnormalities in many psychiatric disorders [22••]. However, PSG is not widely available or convenient for the majority of patients. In clinical practice, sleep disturbances are often assessed via clinical interviews. Commonly, this assessment is based on self-reported sleep measurements, which are susceptible to recall bias and inaccuracies [23] [24]. A good example of this phenomenon is given by Dagan et al. [25] where the researchers found that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients tended to misperceive sleep problems and found no correlation between patients’ self-reports and actigraphy measurements for sleep duration, sleep efficiency, activity, and number of sleep/wake transitions. Given the cognitive impairment associated with psychotic disorders, and the false beliefs linked to depressive and anxiety disorders, it is likely that self-reported sleep symptoms may not be accurate.

Actigraphy has emerged as a more practical method for recording patients’ circadian rhythms [26]. Actigraphs are compact devices that allow tracking of sleep/wake patterns for long periods of time in patient’s own environment, but their downside is that they cannot measure sleep staging. Despite this limitation, they are used in the clinical evaluation of treatment benefits for some sleep disorders [27, 28]. Like electroencephalogram (EEG) and PSG, actigraphs have been extensively studied [25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34]. Compared to PSG, sleep parameters measured using actigraphy can be highly correlated in major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders [35, 36, 37], as well as both bipolar disorder and schizophrenia spectrum disorders [30].

Smartphones, Wearables, and New Opportunities for Sleep Monitoring and Intervention

Recent advances in wearables and mobile applications have created new opportunities for symptom tracking and intervention in psychiatry and for assessment of sleep patterns [38••, 39]. Prior technologies such as PSG or actigraphy are not part of an individual’s daily routine, whereas smartphones are ubiquitous [40] and can yield new opportunities to track behaviors in a non-invasive manner. Moreover, smartphones have embedded sensors that can facilitate data acquisition (e.g., accelerometer, microphone), offering novel opportunities to passively monitor patients in their natural environments. In recent years, studies have increasingly utilized smartphones for measuring individuals’ behavior in naturalistic settings. Several of these studies have focused on measuring different features of sleep, such as sleep onset and wake-up time [41•], sleep midpoint and duration [42], disruptions [43], chronotype [44•], and activity rhythms [45] in the general population as well as patients with psychiatric disorders [46••, 47].

In addition to sleep assessment and monitoring, today’s smartphones have the potential to provide sleep related interventions, such as insomnia cognitive behavioral therapy (CBTi), and they can translate data into immediately actionable adjunctive treatments. Thus in mood, anxiety, and psychotic illnesses, where sleep disorders are often outcome predictors, highly prevalent, and associated with increased morbidity and mortality—smartphones offer promising, low-cost, accessible, and practical tools to assist with the diagnosis, monitoring, and in some cases treatment [23, 33, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. In the sections that follow, we summarize examples identified from the published literature on the use of smartphones to measure sleep parameters and interventions in patients with depression, anxiety, and psychotic disorders.

In this report, we searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, and Web of Science to identify recent studies using smartphones for assessment of sleep among persons with mental illness. Specifically, we searched for original, peer-reviewed, research articles published in English covering three broad concepts: (1) sleep (e.g. “insomnia,” “circadian rhythm”); (2) mobile sensing technology (e.g., “smartphone,” “app,” “wearable,” “sensor”); and (3) mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders (e.g., “depression,” “bipolar disorder,” “schizophrenia”). We screened around 5000 articles and considered only reports of studies that reported explicitly to have measured sleep-related outcomes with smartphones among patients with psychiatric disorders (e.g., major depression disorder, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorders including schizophrenia, schizoaffective, and bipolar disorders). We did not consider any papers featuring case reports, protocols, literature reviews, or editorials. We realize that as our process was not systematic, there are some papers we may not have reviewed or included here.

Evidence for Using Smartphones for Sleep Monitoring and Intervention Among Patients with Psychiatric Disorders

With our limited search strategy, we found eight interesting examples using smartphones and wearable technology for sleep tracking, monitoring, or intervention among individuals with psychiatric disorders. Among them, six studies used different smartphone applications for monitoring sleep and delivering targeted instructional content related to sleep hygiene, and two studies included the use of wearable devices for tracking sleep patterns. First, Schaffer et al. [53] performed a 6-week open-label clinical trial to analyze the effect of quetiapine XR for depressed patients who had not reported improvement with an antidepressant treatment. In this study, smartphones were used to gather daily self-reported data from 26 individuals by administering electronic versions of the 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR) and 7-item Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A). In addition, clinical assessments were performed during weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6. The authors found very early changes in the depressive and anxiety symptoms of the subjects reported via smartphones. The greatest change in depression symptoms was detected in the sleep item, although it only accounted for less than one third of the overall change.

Second, in a study by Kane et al. [54], wearable chest sensors were used for monitoring sleep characteristics in a group of 28 adults with bipolar disorder (n = 12) and schizophrenia (n = 16) over a 4-week period. The sensors, which were integrated with smartphones, were part of the digital health feedback system, a networked system that acquired, summarized, communicated, and displayed information about medication use (ingestion), health status, and daily activities. As part of this study, sleep duration and disruption were derived from the accelerometer data collected by the wearable sensor, while the sleep quality was self-assessed on a Likert scale and entered into a smartphone app. Interestingly, there were no distinguishable differences in sleep duration or disruption between bipolar and schizophrenia patients. Spearman rank correlation coefficients, between the system-derived and the self-reported sleep metrics, were 0.3 for duration and 0.2 for sleep disruption. The authors point out that these correlations are not meaningful and highlight the well-known differences between objective and subjective measurements of sleep in patients with depression and schizophrenia as a possible reason for the finding. The authors also suggest that smartphones and sensors are feasible and useful for monitoring changes in sleep for psychotic patients.

Third, Ben-Zeev et al. [55] employed smartphones to support psychiatric illness self-management among patients with schizophrenia, and sleep was included as one of the targets. The app, called FOCUS, was piloted with 33 patients over a 1-month period and in part provided on-demand psychoeducation on sleep. There were no significant changes in patients’ beliefs about sleep difficulties or medication before and after the intervention. This outcome may be explained by the fact that the sleep intervention component of FOCUS was not designed to provoke short-term relief but rather to promote long-term behavior changes and management of psychiatric symptoms, for example, by modifying sleep hygiene. Thus, it is possible that the trial period was too short to capture changes in sleep. In a later proof-of-concept study, Ben-Zeev et al. utilized FOCUS-Audio/Video (FOCUS-AV) [56], another version of the FOCUS application, which has all the modules of FOCUS in video format. In this study, completed over a month by nine out of ten original participants all with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, participants had access to videos. In these videos, a clinician offered shortened versions of management strategies that are normally administered during a live in-person therapy session. Patients could access these videos on demand. On average, patients accessed the sleep module 8.8 times throughout the study (third rank among all modules), suggesting high interest in improving sleep hygiene among this group of patients. Based on the feedback from the patients, the authors describe these video-based interventions as usable and understandable as well as highly engaging.

Fourth, MoodRhythm is a smartphone application designed for sleep and disturbance of rhythms in affective disorders [57]. In a 4-week long study [58], seven patients with bipolar disorder were given loaner smartphones with MoodRhythm preinstalled. Social rhythms therapy is a method used for treatment of patients with bipolar disorder in which the stability of rhythms of daily life events is assessed by social rhythm metric (SRM) by self-report (pen and paper). The MoodRhythm app uses machine learning to estimate SRM scores from passively collected smartphone data. Among the five social activities that SRM measures, one of them is “out of bed” and “to bed” times. The users’ input (SRM score) serves as the ground truth in this model. Using this approach, the authors inferred subjects’ scores and managed to distinguish between stable rhythm days (SRM ≥ 3.5) and unstable rhythm days (SRM < 3.3) with good accuracy (precision 0.85 and recall 0.86).

Fifth, Faurholt-Jepsen et al. [51] report on a 6-month clinical trial with 61 bipolar patients using MONitoring, treAtment and pRediCtion of bipolAr disorder episodes MONARCA, a smartphone-based self-monitoring system, compared to a control group without MONARCA. No statistically significant correlation was found between self-reported sleep duration and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores, although the authors report a negative correlation between self-report and Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores. A previous study on MONARCA [59•] collected self-reported sleep duration but reports no results on it.

Sixth, Ben-Zeev et al. [60] and Wang et al. [61•] describe a study with a symptom prediction system called CrossCheck, which tracks schizophrenia symptoms based on Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in 36 recently discharged outpatients with schizophrenia over a period of 2 to 12 months. The CrossCheck symptom prediction system predicts the BPRS score every week based on passive smartphone data and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) collected over 30 days. In clinic visits, which varied in frequency from weekly to monthly, the clinicians administered a seven-item BPRS. The outcome of the BPRS scores later served as the ground truth when predicting BPRS scores collected passively using the smartphone. This study is not directly about sleep; however, different sleep parameters are inferred from passive data (duration, bed time, rise time) also one of the EMA questions is “have you been sleeping well?” which is asked three times a week. Seventh, in an 8-week pilot study with 15 patients with schizophrenia (14 completed with varying level of adherence) conducted by Meyer et al. [62], the aim was to use consumer wearable devices for early detection of relapse by monitoring disturbances in the sleep–wake cycle. In this pilot study, each participant was given an exercise tracker (Fitbit Charge HR) and a loaner smartphone with the Purple Robot and SleepSight apps preinstalled. Study participants were instructed to submit sleep diaries and answer questions about the severity of their symptoms through SleepSight on a daily basis. These entries served as ground truth for the passively collected data. In this pilot study, feasibility was explored based on participants’ adherence to the technology and wearable devices, as well as the agreement between subjective and objective measurements of sleep. Lower sleep diary completion and symptom diary completion rates were associated with negative symptoms (spearman correlation with sleep diary completion ρ = − .49, P < .05 and symptom diary completion ρ = − .40, P < .01). Thirteen out of 14 participants met the criteria for 70% feasibility threshold for completion of the daily sleep diary on SleepSight app, with a mean average of 91% of all questionnaires completed. In addition, 12 out of 14 participants met the feasibility criteria for completion of the symptom diary, with a mean average of 88% of filling out the questionnaires. The authors concluded that patients with schizophrenia show interest in sleep disturbances as an indicator of relapse and that they appear willing to use consumer wearable devices and technologies for sleep monitoring. However, lower adherence with active monitoring towards the end of the study suggests that passive monitoring may be more acceptable for patients over longer duration.

Finally, a study by Staples et al. [46••] focuses on sleep and explores use of smartphone data for monitoring sleep among patients with schizophrenia. In this study, 17 patients currently in treatment for schizophrenia installed the Beiwe app on their phones, which collected passive data continuously and EMA data three times a week. The subjects were administered the Pittsburgh Sleep Questionnaire Inventory (PSQI) in clinic monthly, and the PSQI scores were then compared to the EMA and sleep assessments based on the passive data (here, accelerometer data) gathered from the app. In classifying sleep quality either as low or high, the authors report 85% agreement between in-clinic PSQI scores and EMA data. Estimates of sleep duration based on smartphone accelerometer data were moderately correlated (r = 0.69, 95% CI 0.23–0.90) with EMA. By combining EMA data and accelerometer data, the authors predicted PSQI scores for all subjects with high accuracy (mean average error = 0.75). Even though missing data emerged as a concern in this study, the authors conclude that smartphone monitoring of sleep in individuals with schizophrenia could possibly be used for predicting in-clinic sleep metrics. In fact, it is expected that missingness is generally a concern with passively collected smartphone data; most of the reviewed papers may have simply ignored this problem as its reliable detection requires collection and analysis of raw sensor data, as was done in this final paper.

Future Possibilities and Pitfalls

While we identified relatively few studies using smartphone technology to monitor sleep in mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorders, we expect that this topic will continue to gain greater research interest as smartphones and other consumer devices become more ubiquitous. This is evident from the growing number of publications in this area in the past couple of years. Despite the small number of studies, we can draw several important insights from this literature. First, most of the studies suggest that smartphones are suitable for tracking patients’ activity and could be used to find new biomarkers of mental disorders, and some studies conclude that it is feasible to monitor changes in sleep characteristics using wearable sensors [46••, 54, 55, 62]. Second, smartphones are a potential tool for collecting both passive and active data from subjects. Passive data can be collected by means of smartphones’ embedded sensors, while active data can be obtained by using a mobile-friendly survey. Third, because most of the sensors used for sleep monitoring are already included in smartphones, it may not be necessary to deploy separate wearables for gathering information solely about sleep. For example, recent studies suggest that smartphones can be adapted and used to measure and classify populations with sleep problems [63, 64, 65]. Importantly, we did not encounter any studies that sought to replicate or reproduce research results using consumer mobile technologies for sleep or any studies that reported improvement in clinically meaningful sleep and mental health outcomes over time, raising the need for further research.

There are also several limitations regarding what smartphone data can tell us about sleep that require careful consideration. For example, currently available consumer mobile devices like smartphones and smartwatches are not equipped with medical grade sensors. Additionally, sleep staging is not feasible at present with smartphone data alone. Nevertheless, the ability of smartphones to track social and behavioral markers offers a unique opportunity to better understand the complexity of mental disorders. Other valuable data, such as duration and hours of sleep, can already be collected; as the methods for inferring these and other sleep parameters improve, this approach is expected to provide important insights into psychiatric illnesses. Overall, smartphones can be helpful for collecting rich human behavioral data with minimal cost if patients can use their own devices [66]. Therefore, tracking and monitoring sleep outcomes may integrate seamlessly into the daily lives of individuals living with psychiatric disorders, offering potential to yield insights about the important relationship between sleep quality and sleep patterns and mental health symptoms.

While current use of smartphones in this context involves measuring sleep via self-reported surveys, new methods and algorithms can be developed to measure sleep using passive data, reducing the need for active user input in data collection. Questionnaires like the PSQI can be employed to learn about subjects’ behavioral patterns and can contribute to training algorithms for extracting information from passive data. In addition, simple logical rules and decision trees can be implemented to infer sleep/wake status based on passive data, and Bayesian methods can be applied to encode prior beliefs and increase the robustness of predictions and inference [67]. Based on these observations, it seems clear that smartphones have substantially more potential to support the monitoring of sleep related problems than what is currently reflected in the literature. At this time, it seems appropriate that consumer wearable devices like smartphones and smartwatches could augment sleep monitoring. Furthermore, increased emphasis is needed on the potential utility of smartphone technologies for delivering treatment interventions beyond active or passive symptom monitoring. For instance, digital prompts could be tailored to patients’ needs by leveraging real time insights collected through sleep monitoring applications in order to facilitate treatment of sleep problems and improve mental health outcomes.

External sensors are one possibility to enhance the existing capabilities of smartphones [65] as they can be attached to the devices, potentially improving the accuracy and reliability of data capture. For example, smartphone apps have been used to identify patients with obstructive sleep apnea, a disorder that is common in patients with mood and psychotic disorders [64, 68, 69]. However, wearable sensors suffer from even lower adherence and compliance than smartphone applications, and thus, there appears to be a compromise between study adherence and data that must be evaluated. Although the studies summarized here reported fairly high average adherence, the duration of the studies was relatively short, with all being 6 months or less. Because of the nature of many psychiatric illnesses, it is unclear what long-term adherence can be expected, especially during severe phases of mania and/or depression.

In psychiatric disorders, sleep staging including quantification of slow wave sleep and spindles can have potential diagnostic and prognostic applications [15, 18]. Changes in sleep are also early warning signs of relapse in schizophrenia or conversion in schizophrenia prodrome. Technology is now becoming available to use portable EEG electrodes to enable this monitoring via smartphones [70] and other portable devices [71]. While further work is needed to examine feasibility and utility of these applications, especially regarding long-term use, their potential is promising.

As surveys captured using smartphone technologies are a valid form of data collection [65, 72], it is important to compare smartphone-based sleep surveys with objective measurement of sleep disturbances in mental disorder patients. Since PSG is the gold standard in sleep research, it is also necessary to examine how smartphone sensors compare to PSG in order to understand the limitations of smartphone-based measurements. For example, one recent study from the general population compared results collected from an app versus PSG measurements, finding that the app performed poorly [73]. However, these results do not generalize to other smartphone apps, and given the wide variation in quality and technical features, the performance of each app may need to be evaluated individually. Kolla et al. [74••] reported on studies that compared smartphones with PSG/actigraphy, but since most of these studies were carried out in healthy individuals, it is difficult to generalize those results to clinical populations.

Another potential use of smartphone technology is intervention for treatment of sleep problems. By using smartphones, interventions could be tailored to individuals’ specific symptoms at specific times, motivating patients to use preventive strategies while coping with real life situations and critical moments. This alone could lead to a reduction of the intensity of the clinic-based sections and improve the patients’ quality of life significantly [50]. Despite FOCUS yielding promising results in the intervention field, interventions related to improving sleep hygiene did not have significant changes in the subjects’ beliefs; Ben-Zeev et al. suggest that this might have been because of the short duration of the trial [55] leaving the topic open for further investigation. However, since patients’ participation in active monitoring may decrease drastically over time, future studies should also aim to find the right balance between the amount of active and passive monitoring and to find ways to encourage patients to increase their adherence to active participation.

Smartphones can also directly deliver sleep interventions and there is a rapidly emerging evidence for delivering CBT insomnia [75]. Randomized trials suggest benefit in those with self-reported symptoms of insomnia [76••] and evidence for this modality for psychotic disorders will likely soon emerge.


We reviewed the use of smartphones in sleep research in mood, anxiety, and psychotic disorder patients. We conclude with two main observations related to the current state of the field. First, we found limited research in the form of published papers on this topic, perhaps due to the novelty of the topic and approach. While there are a larger number of studies reporting smartphone-based sleep monitoring in general patient populations, there are very few studies of digital sleep monitoring and intervention among individuals diagnosed with psychiatric disorders. Given the strong link between sleep quality and mental health symptoms, this is an important area for future investigation. Second, as this field continues to advance rapidly, we anticipate that many more studies in the future will make use of this approach. It is likely that there are currently many more studies in progress that were not captured in our review. Importantly, while most of the studies in our review were pilot studies, the findings highlight the feasibility and acceptability of using smartphones for subjective assessment and objective monitoring of sleep among individuals with depression, anxiety, and psychotic disorders. At present, smartphone technologies do not appear to offer the quality or depth of sleep data compared to PSG, though it is plausible that as the technology and methods improve, new possibilities for detecting sleep problems in individuals with psychiatric disorders will emerge. Smartphones are ubiquitous and they offer a simple and practical tool that may offer clinical value and utility. The early findings summarized here are promising and emphasize this as an important area worthy of further exploration.



TA gratefully acknowledges the support of the EIT Digital doctoral school for her visit to the Onnela Lab in the Department Biostatistics at Harvard University.

Funding Information

Open access funding provided by University of Helsinki including Helsinki University Central Hospital. TA’s research is funded by James S. McDonnell Foundation; JPO was funded by NIH award DP2MH103909.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Talayeh Aledavood, Ana Maria Triana Hoyos, John A. Naslund, and Matcheri Keshavan each declare no potential conflict of interest.

John Torous has received fund for a research project from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Jukka-Pekka Onnela has received an unrestricted gift from Mindstrong Health and funding for a joint research project from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S, Priebe S, Smith S, Torous J, Arbuckle MR, Langford A, Alarcón RD, Chiu HF, First MB. The WPA-lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4(10):775-818. This article describes several key priorities for psychiatry over the next decade and in particular focuses on the role of digital technologies, as well as the potential challenges and promising opportunities. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kalucy MJ, Grunstein R, Lambert T, Glozier N. Obstructive sleep apnoea and schizophrenia–A research agenda. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2013;17(5):357-65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Monti JM, BaHammam AS, Pandi-Perumal SR, Bromundt V, Spence DW, Cardinali DP, Brown GM. Sleep and circadian rhythm dysregulation in schizophrenia. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2013;43:209-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benca RM, Okawa M, Uchiyama M, Ozaki S, Nakajima T, Shibui K, Obermeyer WH. Sleep and mood disorders. Sleep medicine reviews. 1997;1(1):45-56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malik S, Kanwar A, Sim LA, Prokop LJ, Wang Z, Benkhadra K, Murad MH. The association between sleep disturbances and suicidal behaviors in patients with psychiatric diagnoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic reviews. 2014;3(1):18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neckelmann D, Mykletun A, Dahl A. Chronic insomnia as a risk factor for developing anxiety and depression. Sleep. 2007;30(7):873–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Franzen PL, Buysse DJ. Sleep disturbances and depression: risk relationships for subsequent depression and therapeutic implications. 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cohrs S. Sleep disturbances in patients with schizophrenia. CNS drugs. 2008;22(11):939-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keshavan MS, Diwadkar V, Montrose DM, Stanley J, Pettegrew JW. Premorbid characterization in schizophrenia: the Pittsburgh High Risk Study. World Psychiatry. World Psychiatry. 2004;3(3):163–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benson KL. Sleep in schizophrenia: impairments, correlates, and treatment. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2006;29(4):1033–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Myles H, Myles N, Antic NA, Adams R, Chandratilleke M, Liu D, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and schizophrenia: a systematic review to inform clinical practice. Schizophr Res. 2016;170:222–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohayon MM. The effects of breathing-related sleep disorders on mood disturbances in the general population. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2003;64(10):1195-200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chouinard S, Poulin J, Stip E, Godbout R. Sleep in untreated patients with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2004;30(4):957-67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffmann R, Hendrickse W, Rush AJ, Armitage R. Slow-wave activity during non-REM sleep in men with schizophrenia and major depressive disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2000;95(3):215–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keshavan MS, Reynolds CF, Kupfer DJ. Electroencephalographic sleep in schizophrenia: a critical review. Compr Psychiatry. 1990;31(1):34–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harvey AG, Talbot LS, Gershon A. Sleep disturbance in bipolar disorder across the lifespan. Clin Psychol (New York). 2009;16(2):256–77.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keshavan MS, Montrose DM, Miewald JM, Jindal RD. Sleep correlates of cognition in early course psychotic disorders. Schizophr Res. 2011;131(1–3):231–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manoach DS, Demanuele C, Wamsley EJ, Vangel M, Montrose DM, Miewald J, et al. Sleep spindle deficits in antipsychotic-naïve early course schizophrenia and in non-psychotic first-degree relatives. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:762.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wamsley EJ, Tucker MA, Shinn AK, Ono KE, McKinley SK, Ely AV, et al. Reduced sleep spindles and spindle coherence in schizophrenia: mechanisms of impaired memory consolidation? Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71(2):154–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zanini MA, Castro J, Cunha GR, Asevedo E, Pan PM, Bittencourt L, et al. Abnormalities in sleep patterns in individuals at risk for psychosis and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Res. 2015;169(1–3):262–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lopez J, Hoffmann R, Armitage R. Reduced sleep spindle activity in early-onset and elevated risk for depression. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(9):934–43.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    •• Baglioni C, Nanovska S, Regen W, Spiegelhalder K, Feige B, Nissen C, Reynolds III CF, Riemann D. Sleep and mental disorders: A meta-analysis of polysomnographic research. Psychological bulletin. 2016;142(9):969. Important meta-analysis showing that there were variations in polysomnographic (PSG) characteristics across several different mental disorders, highlighting that different diagnoses may result in altered sleep in different ways. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ben-Zeev D, Scherer EA, Wang R, Xie H, Campbell AT. Next-generation psychiatric assessment: Using smartphone sensors to monitor behavior and mental health. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal. 2015;38(3):218.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gloster AT, Richard D, Himle J, Koch E, Anson H, Lokers L, et al. Accuracy of retrospective memory and covariation estimation in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behav Res Ther. 2008;46(5):642–55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dagan Y, Zinger Y, Lavie P. Actigraphic sleep monitoring in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 1997 Jun 1;42(6):577-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP. The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep. 2003;26(3):342–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ancoli-Israel S, Martin JL, Blackwell T, Buenaver L, Liu L, Meltzer LJ, Sadeh A, Spira AP, Taylor DJ. The SBSM guide to actigraphy monitoring: clinical and research applications. Behavioral sleep medicine. 2015;13(sup1):S4-38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sadeh A, Hauri PJ, Kripke DF, Lavie P. The role of actigraphy in the evaluation of sleep disorders. Sleep. 1995;18(4):288–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gershon A, Thompson WK, Eidelman P, McGlinchey EL, Kaplan KA, Harvey AG. Restless pillow, ruffled mind: sleep and affect coupling in interepisode bipolar disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012;121(4):863–73.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kaplan KA, Talbot LS, Gruber J, Harvey AG. Evaluating sleep in bipolar disorder: comparison between actigraphy, polysomnography, and sleep diary. Bipolar disorders. 2012;14(8):870-9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Korszun A, Young EA, Engleberg NC, Brucksch CB, Greden JF, Crofford LA. Use of actigraphy for monitoring sleep and activity levels in patients with fibromyalgia and depression. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(6):439–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McCall C, McCall WV. Comparison of actigraphy with polysomnography and sleep logs in depressed insomniacs. Journal of sleep research. 2012;21(1):122-7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Prociow P, Crowe J. Personalised ambient monitoring for people with bipolar disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. 2011;26:e175-6.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Robillard R, Hermens DF, Naismith SL, White D, Rogers NL, Ip TK, Mullin SJ, Alvares GA, Guastella AJ, Smith KL, Rong Y. Ambulatory sleep-wake patterns and variability in young people with emerging mental disorders. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN. 2015;40(1):28.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Berle JO, Hauge ER, Oedegaard KJ, Holsten F, Fasmer OB. Actigraphic registration of motor activity reveals a more structured behavioural pattern in schizophrenia than in major depression. BMC research notes. 2010;3(1):149.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Emens J, Lewy A, Kinzie JM, Arntz D, Rough J. Circadian misalignment in major depressive disorder. Psychiatry research. 2009;168(3):259-61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jean-Louis G, Mendlowicz MV, Gillin JC, Rapaport MH, Kelsoe JR, Zizi F, et al. Sleep estimation from wrist activity in patients with major depression. Physiology ∓ behavior. 2000;70(1–2):49–53.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    •• Abdullah S, Choudhury T. Sensing technologies for monitoring serious mental illnesses. IEEE MultiMedia. 2018;25(1):61-75.. This article provides an overview of the potential and limitations with using sensing technologies for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with serious mental illnesses and also considers the possibility for sensing technologies to support tracking of behavioral, physiological, and social signals relevant to serious mental illness. Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Torous J, Keshavan M. A new window into psychosis: The rise digital phenotyping, smartphone assessment, and mobile monitoring. Schizophrenia research. 2018;197:67-8.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Center PR. The smartphone difference. Pew Research Center. 2015:1-60.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    • Saeb S, Cybulski TR, Schueller SM, Kording KP, Mohr DC. Scalable passive sleep monitoring using mobile phones: opportunities and obstacles. Journal of medical Internet research. 2017;19(4):e118. This study is important because it shows that mobile phones can provide adequate sleep monitoring. PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Abdullah S, Matthews M, Murnane EL, Gay G, Choudhury T. Towards circadian computing: early to bed and early to rise makes some of us unhealthy and sleep deprived. InProceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing 2014;673-684. ACM.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Murnane EL, Abdullah S, Matthews M, Choudhury T, Gay G. Social (media) jet lag: How usage of social technology can modulate and reflect circadian rhythms. InProceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing 2015;843-854. ACM.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    • Aledavood T, Lehmann S, Saramäki J. Social network differences of chronotypes identified from mobile phone data. EPJ Data Science. 2018;7(1):46. This study shows that sleep behaviors of students have an impact on the structure of their social networks and their social interaction. Those who stay up late and wake up late (owls) are more central in the social network of students than those who go to sleep early and wake up early (larks). Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Aledavood T, Lehmann S, Saramäki J. Digital daily cycles of individuals. 3(2015):73.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    •• Staples P, Torous J, Barnett I, Carlson K, Sandoval L, Keshavan M, Onnela JP. A comparison of passive and active estimates of sleep in a cohort with schizophrenia. NPJ schizophrenia. 2017;3(1):37. This article reports on a study demonstrating that smarphones show feasibility for monitoring sleep among persons with schizophrenia and may assist in the identification of sleep abnormalities in this patient group. For example, phone-based accelerometer data was used to infer sleep duration and showed moderate correlations with self-assessment of sleep duration. Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zulueta J, Piscitello A, Rasic M, Easter R, Babu P, Langenecker SA, et al. Predicting mood disturbance severity with mobile phone keystroke metadata: a biaffect digital phenotyping study. J Med Internet. 2018;20(7):10–2196.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Babson KA, Ramo DE, Baldini L, Vandrey R, Bonn-Miller MO. Mobile app-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: feasibility and initial efficacy among veterans with cannabis use disorders. JMIR research protocols. 2015;4(3):e87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bauer M, Grof P, Gyulai L, Rasgon N, Glenn T, Whybrow PC. Using technology to improve longitudinal studies: self‐reporting with ChronoRecord in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders. 2004;6(1):67-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Depp CA, Mausbach B, Granholm E, Cardenas V, Ben-Zeev D, Patterson TL, Lebowitz BD, Jeste DV. Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: design and preliminary data from three approaches. The Journal of nervous and mental disease. 2010;198(10):715.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Faurholt‐Jepsen M, Vinberg M, Frost M, Christensen EM, Bardram JE, Kessing LV. Smartphone data as an electronic biomarker of illness activity in bipolar disorder. Bipolar disorders. 2015;17(7):715-28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lemola S, Perkinson-Gloor N, Brand S, Dewald-Kaufmann JF, Grob A. Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2015;44(2):405-18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schaffer A, Kreindler D, Reis C, Levitt AJ. Use of mental health telemetry to enhance identification and predictive value of early changes during augmentation treatment of major depression. Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. 2013;33(6):775-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kane JM, Perlis RH, DiCarlo LA, Au-Yeung K, Duong J, Petrides G. First experience with a wireless system incorporating physiologic assessments and direct confirmation of digital tablet ingestions in ambulatory patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2013;74(6):e533-40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ben-Zeev D, Brenner CJ, Begale M, Duffecy J, Mohr DC, Mueser KT. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. 2014;40(6):1244–53.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ben-Zeev D, Brian RM, Aschbrenner KA, Jonathan G, Steingard S. Video-based mobile health interventions for people with schizophrenia: Bringing the “pocket therapist” to life. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal. 2018;41(1):39.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Matthews M, Abdullah S, Murnane E, Voida S, Choudhury T, Gay G, Frank E. Development and evaluation of a smartphone-based measure of social rhythms for bipolar disorder. Assessment. 2016;23(4):472-83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abdullah S, Matthews M, Frank E, Doherty G, Gay G, Choudhury T. Automatic detection of social rhythms in bipolar disorder. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2016;23(3):538-43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    • Faurholt-Jepsen M, Frost M, Vinberg M, Christensen EM, Bardram JE, Kessing LV. Smartphone data as objective measures of bipolar disorder symptoms. Psychiatry research. 2014;217(1-2):124-7. This pilot study describes the use of a smartphone-based system for continuously monitoring participants with schizophrenia in order to detect indicators of psychotic relapse. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ben-Zeev D, Brian R, Wang R, Wang W, Campbell AT, Aung MS, Merrill M, Tseng VW, Choudhury T, Hauser M, Kane JM. CrossCheck: Integrating self-report, behavioral sensing, and smartphone use to identify digital indicators of psychotic relapse. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal. 2017;40(3):266.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    • Wang R, Wang W, Aung MS, Ben-Zeev D, Brian R, Campbell AT, et al. Predicting symptom trajectories of schizophrenia using mobile sensing. In: Conference Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies; 2017. This pilot study is important because it documents the feasibility and acceptability of using consumer wearable devices and smartphones for passively monitoring the sleep patterns of persons living with schizophrenia. Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Meyer N, Kerz M, Folarin A, Joyce DW, Jackson R, Karr C, Dobson R, MacCabe J. Capturing rest-activity profiles in Schizophrenia using wearable and mobile technologies: development, implementation, feasibility, and acceptability of a remote monitoring platform. JMIR mHealth and uHealth. 2018;6(10):e188.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Al-Mardini M, Aloul F, Sagahyroon A, Al-Husseini L. Classifying obstructive sleep apnea using smartphones. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2014;52:251-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Al-Mardini M, Aloul F, Sagahyroon A, Al-Husseini L. On the use of smartphones for detecting obstructive sleep apnea. In13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering 2013;1-4. IEEE.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Behar J, Roebuck A, Domingos JS, Gederi E, Clifford GD. A review of current sleep screening applications for smartphones. Physiological measurement. 2013;34(7):R29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Walch OJ, Cochran A, Forger DB. A global quantification of “normal” sleep schedules using smartphone data. Science advances. 2016;2(5):e1501705.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cuttone A, Bækgaard P, Sekara V, Jonsson H, Larsen JE, Lehmann S. Sensiblesleep: A bayesian model for learning sleep patterns from smartphone events. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0169901.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Behar J, Roebuck A, Shahid M, Daly J, Hallack A, Palmius N, Stradling J, Clifford GD. SleepAp: an automated obstructive sleep apnoea screening application for smartphones. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics. 2014;19(1):325-31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Garde A, Dehkordi P, Wensley D, Ansermino JM, Dumont GA. Pulse oximetry recorded from the Phone Oximeter for detection of obstructive sleep apnea events with and without oxygen desaturation in children. In2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2015;7692-7695. IEEE.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tal A, Shinar Z, Shaki D, Codish S, Goldbart A. Validation of contact-free sleep monitoring device with comparison to polysomnography. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2017;13(03):517-22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sterr A, Ebajemito JK, Mikkelsen KB, Bonmati-Carrion MA, Santhi N, Della Monica C, Grainger L, Atzori G, Revell V, Debener S, Dijk DJ. Sleep EEG Derived From Behind-the-Ear Electrodes (cEEGrid) Compared to Standard Polysomnography: A Proof of Concept Study. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2018;12.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Aledavood T, Hoyos AM, Alakörkkö T, Kaski K, Saramäki J, Isometsä E, Darst RK. Data collection for mental health studies through digital platforms: requirements and design of a prototype. JMIR research protocols. 2017;6(6):e110.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bhat S, Ferraris A, Gupta D, Mozafarian M, DeBari VA, Gushway-Henry N, Gowda SP, Polos PG, Rubinstein M, Seidu H, Chokroverty S. Is there a clinical role for smartphone sleep apps? Comparison of sleep cycle detection by a smartphone application to polysomnography. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2015;11(07):709-15.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    •• Kolla BP, Mansukhani S, Mansukhani MP. Consumer sleep tracking devices: a review of mechanisms, validity and utility. Expert review of medical devices. 2016;13(5):497-506. This review evaluates the literature reporting the accuracy of consumer sleep tracking devices compared to more conventional sleep measurement methods. Importantly, this review highlights that among normal subjects, consumer tracking devices tend to underestimate sleep disruptions and overestimate total sleep times and sleep efficiency. Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Yu JS, Kuhn E, Miller KE, Taylor K. Smartphone apps for insomnia: examining existing apps’ usability and adherence to evidence-based principles for insomnia management. Translational behavioral medicine. 2018;9(1):110-9.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    •• Espie CA, Emsley R, Kyle SD, Gordon C, Drake CL, Siriwardena AN, Cape J, Ong JC, Sheaves B, Foster R, Freeman D. Effect of digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia on health, psychological well-being, and sleep-related quality of life: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA psychiatry. 2019;76(1):21-30. An important large-scale randomized controlled trial showing that use of digital cognitive behavioral therapy is effective in improving functional health, psychological well-being, and sleep-related quality of life in people reporting insomnia symptoms. This study highlights that a digital intervention can contribute to clinically meaningful benefits in the treatment of insomnia. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Talayeh Aledavood
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • John Torous
    • 3
    • 4
  • Ana Maria Triana Hoyos
    • 2
  • John A. Naslund
    • 5
  • Jukka-Pekka Onnela
    • 6
  • Matcheri Keshavan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceAalto UniversityEspooFinland
  3. 3.Division of Digital Psychiatry Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  5. 5.Department of Global Health and Social MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  6. 6.Department of BiostatisticsHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations