Forensic Competency Assessment with Digital Technologies
- 32 Downloads
Purpose of the Review
We review the application of videoconferencing (VC) to pretrial forensic assessments of competence to stand trial (CST). We summarize the benefits, legal considerations, and reliability of VC evaluations. Based on our experience with VC in forensic settings, we provide illustrations of challenges and recommendations regarding this capability to meet increasing demands for services.
CST evaluations are the most frequent type of forensic mental health assessment within the American legal system. VC can be a reliable method for conducting interviews with most defendants, including those with psychotic symptoms. Videoconferencing can improve the overall efficiency of evaluations while also improving the safety of the professionals involved with the competency evaluation.
VC provides an opportunity to meet the increasing demand for evaluations and improve their efficiency. Forensic clinicians should become familiar with the uses of VC in delivering services so that VC is implemented ethically and effectively.
KeywordsVideoconferencing Forensic evaluation Competency Assessment
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Bonnie R, Grisso T. Adjudicative competence and youthful offenders. In: Grisso T, Schwartz RG, editors. Youth on trial: a developmental perspective, vol. 2000. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 73–103.Google Scholar
- 4.• Gowensmith WN. Resolution or resignation: the role of forensic mental health professionals amidst the competency services crisis. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2019;25:1–14. This review provides an in-depth assessment of the demand for competency-related services and provides recommendations. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG, Slobogin C. Psychological evaluations for the courts: a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.Google Scholar
- 12.•• Luxton DD, Lexcen F. Forensic competency evaluations via videoconferencing: a feasibility review and best practice recommendations. Prof Psych Res Pract. 2018;49(2):124–31. This article provides a practice-friendly review of the legal aspects, technical requirements, and best practices for using videoconferencing for competency evaluations. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.•• Batastini AB, McDonald BR, Morgan RD. Videoteleconferencing in forensic and correctional practice. In: Myers K, Turvey CLK, editors. Telemental health: clinical, technical and administrative foundations for evidence-based practice. Waltham: Elsevier; 2013. p. 251–71. This chapter focuses on need-to-know information for implementing videoconferencing capabilities in correctional settings. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.• Luxton DD, Niemi J. Forensic competency evaluation videoconferencing: a program evaluation in the State of Washington. 2019. Manuscript submitted for publication. This paper reports detailed implementation steps and the results of a new forensic videoconferencing program that connects jails with state competency restoration facilities and forensic evaluators. Google Scholar
- 20.Santesteban-Echarri O, Piskulic D, Nyman R, Addington J. Telehealth interventions for schizophrenia-spectrum disorders and clinical high-risk for psychosis individuals: a scoping review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018:1357633X1879410.Google Scholar
- 21.Morgan RD, Patrick AR, Magaletta PR. Does the use of telemental health alter the treatment experience? Inmates' perceptions of telemental health versus face-to-face treatment modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2008 Feb;76(1):158–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.158. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.•• Manguno-Mire GM, Thompson FW, Shore JH, Croy CD, Artecona JF, Pickering JW. The use of telemedicine to evaluate competency to stand trial: a preliminary randomized controlled study. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2007;35(4):481–9. This research article is one of just a few trials that examine the reliability of videoconferencing compared to in-person evaluations.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.McMillan, J. (2010). Video conferencing survey summary. Available at: https://www.ncsc.org/Services-and-Experts/Areas-of-expertise/Technology/NCSC-Video-Conferencing-Survey.aspx
- 30.•• Lexcen, FJ HGL, Herrick S, Blank MB. Use of video conferencing for psychiatric and forensic evaluations. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57:713–5. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.5.713. This research article is one of just a few studies to examine the reliability of videoconferencing compared to in-person evaluations. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.• Luxton DD, Pruitt LD, Osenbach JE. Best practices for remote psychological assessment via telehealth technologies. Prof Psych Res Pract. 2014;45:27–35. This comprehensive review evaluates the validity and reliability of conducting psychological assessments with videoconferencing and makes recommendations. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Luxton DD, Nelson E, Maheu M. A practitioner’s guide to telemental health. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books; 2016.Google Scholar
- 34.DeGaetano N, Shore J. Conducting a telehealth needs assessment. In: Tuerk PW, Shore P, editors. Clinical videoconferencing in telehealth, behavioral telehealth. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
- 38.Miller WK. Trust and anti-trust: state-based restrictions in telemedicine. UC Davis Law Rev. 2017;50:1807–44.Google Scholar