Computer-Assisted Cognitive-Behavior Therapy and Mobile Apps for Depression and Anxiety
Purpose of Review
We reviewed research on computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy (CCBT) and mobile applications with the goals of assessing the effectiveness of these newer methods of delivering or augmenting treatment and making recommendations on the clinical use of computer tools in psychotherapy of depression and anxiety.
Research on CCBT has found solid evidence for efficacy when the use of a therapeutic computer program is supported by a clinician or other helping professionals. Lower levels of efficacy or ineffectiveness typically have been found when computer programs are used as stand-alone treatments. A large number of mobile apps have been created that claim to be useful for depression and/or anxiety. However, considerable caution is warranted in evaluating mobile apps and recommending them to patients. Research on mobile apps is still in an early stage of development.
A number of well-established CCBT programs have been studied in multiple randomized, controlled trials and have been found to be effective. Such programs appear to have adequate quality, security, and efficacy to be used in clinical practice. Mobile apps offer easy portability and immediate access to coping strategies and may be useful for augmenting treatment. But clinicians need to select apps with integrity and reliable content for clinical use.
KeywordsComputer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy Mobile applications Depression Anxiety
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Jesse H. Wright is an author of the Good Days Ahead (GDA) program used in an investigation cited in this article and has an equity interest in Empower Interactive and Mindstreet, developers and distributors of GDA. He receives no royalties or other payments from sales of this program. His conflict of interest is managed with an agreement with the University of Louisville. He receives book royalties from American Psychiatric Press, Inc., Guilford Press, and Simon and Schuster, and he receives grant support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Oticon Foundation.
Matthew Mishkind receives payments to serve on the Advisory Board of Meta Pro. His conflict of interest is managed with an agreement with the University of Colorado.
Tracy D. Eells declares no conflicts of interest.
Steven R. Chan receives compensation for teaching from North American Center for Continuing Medical Education, LLC. and Guidewell Innovation.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.• Thase ME, Wright JH, Eells TD, Barrett MS, Wisniewski SR, Balasubramani GK, et al. Improving the efficiency of psychotherapy for depression: computer-assisted versus standard cbt. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(3):242–250. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.17010089. A recent direct comparison of CCBT with standard, face-to-face CBT. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.• So M, Yamaguchi S, Hashimoto S, Sado M, Furakawa T, McCrone P. Is computerized CBT really helpful for depression? – a meta-analytic re-evaluation of CCBT for adult depression in terms of clinical implementation and methodological validity. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:113 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244x/13/113. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT for depression. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.•• Wright JH, Owen JJ, Richards D, Eells TD, Richardson T, Brown GK, et al. Computer-assisted cognitive-behavior therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2019. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT for depression.Google Scholar
- 8.• Cuijpers P, Marks IM, van Straten A, Cavanaugh K, Gega L, Andersson G. Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2009;38(2):66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070802694776. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT for anxiety disorders.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.•• Haug T, Nordgreen T, Öst LG, Havik OE. Self-help treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of effects and potential moderators. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32:425–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.04.002. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT for anxiety disorders.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.•• Adelman CB, Panza KE, Bartley CA, Bontempo A, Bloch MH. A meta-analysis of computerized cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of DSM-5 anxiety disorders. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(7):e695–704. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.13r08894. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT for anxiety disorders.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Mohr DC, Ho J, Duffecy J, Baron KG, Lehman KA, Jin L, et al. Perceived barriers to psychological treatments and their relationship to depression. J Clin Psychol. 2010;66(4):394–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20659.
- 16.Proudfoot J, Ryden C, Everitt B, Shapiro DA, Goldberg D, Mann A, et al. Clinical efficacy of computerized cognitive-behavioural therapy for anxiety and depression in primary care: randomized controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;185(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.185.1.46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Glozier N, Christensen H, Naismith S, Cockayne N, Donkin L, Neal B, et al. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with mild to moderate depression and high cardiovascular disease risks: a randomized attention-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hoifodt RS, Lillevoll KR, Griffiths KM, et al. The clinical effectiveness of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy with face-to-face therapist support for depressed primary care patients: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(8):e153. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lintvedt OK, Griffiths KM, Sorense K, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of unguided internet-based self-help intervention for the prevention of depression: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2013;20:10–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.770.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Phillips R, Schneider J, Molosankwe I, Leese M, Foroushani PS, Grime P, et al. Randomized controlled trial of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy for depressive symptoms: effectiveness and costs of a workplace intervention. Psychol Med. 2014;44(4):741–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.•• Carlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018. A recent meta-analysis of CCBT compared with standard CBT;47(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115.47.
- 37.Robinson E, Titov N, Andrews G, McIntyre K, Schwencke G, Solley K. Internet treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinician vs. technician assistance. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10942. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010942.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 39.Newman MG, Szkodny LE, Llera SJ, Przeworski A. A review of technology-assisted self-help and minimal contact therapies for anxiety and depression: is human contact necessary for therapeutic efficacy? Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(1):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.09.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Price RB, Kuckertz JM, Amir N, Bar-Haim Y, Carlbring P, Wallace ML. Less is more: patient-level meta-analysis reveals paradoxical dose-response effects of a computer- based social anxiety intervention targeting attentional bias. Depress Anxiety. 2017;34(12):1106–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22634.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Torous J, Chan RS, Yee Marie Tan S, Behrens J, Mathew I, Conrad EJ, et al. Patient smartphone ownership and interest in mobile apps to monitor symptoms of mental health conditions: a survey in four geographically distinct psychiatric clinics. JMIR Mental Health. 2014;1(1):e5. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.4004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 50.Poushter J Smartphone ownership and internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emergning-economies/. Accessed 9/15/2017, 2017.
- 52.Perrin A. Smartphones help blacks, Hispanics bridge some – but not all – digital gaps with whites: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewrsr.ch/2vMt0iN. Accessed 28 May 2018.
- 53.Anderson M. Racial and ethnic differences in how people use mobile technology. Fact tank: news in the numbers: Pew Research Center. 2015. http://www.pewrsr.ch/1Q346jZ.
- 55.• Huguet A, Rao S, McGrath PJ, Wozney L, Wheaton M, Conrod J, et al. A systematic review of cognitive behavioral therapy and behavioral activation apps for depression. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154248. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154248. A recent review of mobile apps for depression.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Gajecki M, Andersson C, Rosendahl I, Sinadinovic K, Fredriksson M, Berman AH. Skills training via smartphone app for university students with excessive alcohol consumption: a randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2017;2017:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-016-9629-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Meinlschmidt G, Lee JH, Stalujanis E, Belardi A, Oh M, Jung EK, et al. Smartphone-based psychotherapeutic micro-interventions to improve mood in a real-world setting. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1112. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01112.
- 62.• Mohr DC, Tomasino KN, Lattie EG, Palac HL, Kwasny MJ, Weingardt K, et al. IntelliCare: an eclectic, skills-based app suite for the treatment of depression and anxiety. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(1):e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6645. A recent study of mobile apps for depression and anxiety.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 63.• Bush NE, Smolenski DJ, Denneson LM, Williams HB, Thomas EK, Dobscha SK. A Virtual Hope Box: randomized controlled trial of a smartphone app for emotional regulation and coping with distress. Psychiatr Serv. 2017;68(4):330–6. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201600283. A recent study of a mobile app for depression and anxiety.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.•• Firth J, Torous J, Nicholas J, Carney R, Pratap A, Rosenbaum S, et al. The efficacy of smartphone-based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World Psychiatry. 2017;16(3):287–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20472. A recent meta-analysis of mobile apps for depression.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 66.•• Firth J, Torous J, Nicolas J, Carney R, Rosenbaum S, Sarris J. Can smartphone mental health interventions reduce symptoms of anxiety? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.046. A recent meta-analysis of mobile apps for anxiety.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 67.• Kertz SJ, Kelly JM, Stevens KT, Schrock M, Danitz SB. A review of free iPhone applications designed to target anxiety and worry. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science. 2017;2017:1–10. A recent review of mobile apps for anxiety.Google Scholar
- 68.van Velthoven M, Powell J. Do health apps need endorsement? Challenges for giving advice about which health apps are safe and effective to use. Digital Health. 2017;3:1–4.Google Scholar
- 69.NHS Digital (Health and Social Care Information Centre). Information and technology for better care: Health and Social Care Information Centre Strategy. 2015;2015–20. https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/corporate-information-and-documents/our-strategy.
- 74.American Psychiatric Association. Mental Health Apps American Psychiatric Associationh, 2017. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/practice/mental-health-apps. Accessed July 4, 2017, 2017.