Advertisement

Current Psychiatry Reports

, 21:12 | Cite as

Identification and Management of Domestic and Sexual Violence in Primary Care in the #MeToo Era: an Update

  • Kelsey HegartyEmail author
  • Laura Tarzia
Psychiatry in Primary Care (BN Gaynes, Section Editor)
  • 11 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychiatry in Primary Care

Abstract

Purpose of Review

We discuss recent evidence around the identification and response to domestic and sexual violence in primary care for perpetrators and victims, in the context of feminist social media movements such as #MeToo.

Recent Findings

There is no recent research on identification and response to perpetrators in health settings. There is some limited recent evidence for how health settings can address domestic and sexual violence for female victims and their children. Recent studies of mixed quality focus on advocacy and empowerment, integrated interventions (with alcohol and drug misuse) and couples counselling for domestic violence and cognitive behavioural or processing therapy for sexual violence.

Summary

Further research on perpetrator interventions in primary care is urgent. Larger sample sizes and a focus on sexual violence are needed to develop the evidence base for female survivors. Clinicians need to ask about violence and provide a first-line response depending on the patient’s needs.

Keywords

Domestic violence Partner abuse Social media Interventions Health settings 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Kelsey Hegarty and Laura Tarzia declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oram S, Trevillion K, Khalifeh H, Feder G, Howard LM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychiatric disorder and the perpetration of partner violence. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2014;23(4):361–76.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coben J, Friedman D. Health care use by perpetrators of domestic violence. J Emerg Med. 2002;22(3):313–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ayre J, Lum On M, Webster K, Gourley M, Moon L. Examination of the burden of disease of intimate partner violence against women. Sydney: ANROWS; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Felitti V, Anda R. The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult medical disease, psychiatric disorders and sexual behaviour: implications for healthcare. In: Lanius R, Vermetten E, Pain C, editors. The impact of early life trauma on health and disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. p. 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarzia L, Maxwell S, Valpied J, Novy K, Quake R, Hegarty K. Sexual violence associated with poor mental health in women attending Australian general practices. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017;41(5):518–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pico-Alfonso MA, Garcia-Linares MI, Celda-Navarro N, Blasco-Ros C, Echeburua E, Martinez M. The impact of physical, psychological, and sexual intimate male partner violence on women’s mental health: depressive symptoms, posttraumatic stress disorder, state anxiety, and suicide. J Women's Health. 2006;15(5):599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen L, Murad M, Paras M, Colbenson K, Sattler A, Goranson E, et al. Sexual abuse and lifetime diagnosis of psychiatric disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. Proc Mayo Clin. 2010;85(7):618–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mark H, Bitzker K, Klapp B, Rauchfuss M. Gynaecological symptoms associated with physical and sexual violence. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(3):167–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eby K, Campbell J, Sullivan C, Davidson W. Health effects of experiences of sexual violence for women with abusive partners. Health Care Women Int. 1995;16(6):563–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller E, Decker M, McCauley H, Tancredi D, Levenson R, Waldman J, et al. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(4):316–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization. Global plan of action to strengthen the role of the health system within a national multisectoral response to address interpersonal violence, in particular against women and girls, and against children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    United Nations. UN sounds alarm to end ‘global pandemic’ of violence against women. UN News [Internet]. 2014 1/10/18. Available from: https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/11/484692#.We-gOa2ZOU0.
  14. 14.
    Council of Australian Governments. National plan to reduce violence against women and their children 2010-2022. Canberra: Australian Government; 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hawley E, Clifford K, Konkes C. The “Rosie Batty Effect” and the framing of family violence in Australian news media. Journal Stud. 2018;19(5):2304–23.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendes K, Ringrose J, Keller J. #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism. Eur J Women's Stud. 2018;25(2):236–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira A, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2014;385(9977):1567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Plichta SB, Falik M. Prevalence of violence and its implications for women’s health. Womens Health Issues. 2001;11(3):244–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cox P. Violence against women in Australia: Additional analysis of the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ Personal Safety Survey 2012. ANROWS Horizons: 01/2015. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety Limited (ANROWS); 2015.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Feder G, Hutson M, Ramsay J, Taket A. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(1):22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garcia-Moreno C, Hegarty K, d’Oliveira A, Koziol-McLain J, Colombini M, Feder G. The health-systems response to violence against women. Lancet. 2015;385:1567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    NICE. Domestic violence and abuse: how health services, social care and the organisations they work with can respond effectively. London: NICE; 2014.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hegarty K, Feder G, Ramsay J. Identification of partner abuse in health care settings: should health professionals be screening? In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals. London: Elsevier; 2006. p. 79–92.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Tarzia L, Forsdike K, Feder G, Hegarty K. Interventions in health settings for male perpetrators or victims of intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838017744772. This systematic review highlights the paucity of robust evidence to support effective identification and response to male perpetrators of DV in health settings.
  26. 26.
    Williamson E, Jones S, Ferrari G, Debbonaire T, Feder G, Hester M. Health professionals responding to men for safety (HERMES): feasibility of a general practice training intervention to improve the response to male patients who have experienced or perpetrated domestic violence and abuse. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(3):281–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Penti B, Timmons J, Adams D. The role of the physician when a patient discloses intimate partner violence perpetration: a literature review. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(4):635–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Doherty L1, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G, Taft A. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healtcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007007.pub3.
  29. 29.
    Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, Rose M, Arsene C, Norman R, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different health-care settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(16):iii–v, xi-xiii, 1-113, 37-347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zink T, Levin L, Putnam F, Beckstrom A. Accuracy of five domestic violence screening questions with nongraphic language. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2007;46(2):127–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zink T, Levin L, Wollan P, Putnam F. Mothers’ comfort with screening questions about sensitive issues, including domestic violence. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19(4):358–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ahmad F, Hogg-Johnson S, Stewart D, Skinner H, Glazier R, Levinson W. Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(2):93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kataoka Y, Yaju Y, Eto H, Horiuchi S. Self-administered questionnaire versus interview as a screening method for intimate partner violence in the prenatal setting in Japan: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;10:84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Webster J, Holt V. Screening for partner violence: direct questioning or self-report? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(2):299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hussain N, Sprague S, Madden K, Hussain F, Pindiprolu B, Bhandari M. A comparison of the types of screening tool administration methods used for the detection of intimate partner violence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2015;16(1):60–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Arkins B, Begley C, Higgins A. Measures for screening for intimate partner violence: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2016;23(3/4):217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thompson M, Basile KC, Hertz M, Sitterle D. Measuring intimate partner violence victimization and perpetration: a compendium of assessment tools. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2006.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stevens L. Screening for sexual violence: gaps in research and recommendations for change 2007 1/10/18. Available from: https://vawnet.org/sites/default/files/materials/files/2016-09/AR_ScreeningforSV.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
  39. 39.
    Alvarez C, Fedock G, Grace K, Campbell J. Provider screening and counseling for intimate partner violence: a systematic review of practices and influencing factors. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016:1–17.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stayton C, Duncan M. Mutable influences on intimate partner abuse screening in health care settings. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2005;6(4):271–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hegarty K, O’Doherty L, Gunn J, Pierce D, Taft A. A brief counseling intervention by health professionals utilising the ‘readiness to change’ concept for women experiencing intimate partner abuse: the weave project. J Fam Stud. 2008;14(2–3):376–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hegarty K, O’Doherty L, Taft A, Chondros P, Brown S, Valpied J, et al. Screening and counselling in the primary care setting for women who have experienced intimate partner violence (WEAVE): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):249–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bair-Merritt M, Lewis-O’Connor A, Goel S, Amato P, Ismailji T, Jelley M, et al. Primary care-based interventions for intimate partner violence. Am J Prev Med. 2014;46(2):188–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zlotnick C, Capezza N, Perker D. An interpersonally based intervention for low income pregnant women with intimate partner violence: a pilot study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2011;14:5–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Campbell R, Patterson D, Lichty L. The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: a review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2005;6(4):313–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Campbell R, Bybee D, Townsend S, Shaw J, Karim N, Markowitz J. The impact of sexual assault nurse examiner programs on criminal justice case outcomes: a multisite replication study. Violence Against Women. 2014;20(5):607–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    • Parcesepe A, Martin SL, Pollock M, Garcia-Moreno C. The effectiveness of mental health interventions for adult female survivors of sexual assault: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2015;25:15–25 This systematic review provides a useful summary and critique of the current evidence around responding to adult female survivors of SV. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Regehr C, Alaggia R, Dennis J, Pitts A, Saini M. Interventions to reduce distress in adult victims of sexual violence and rape: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2013;2013(3).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Warshaw C, Sullivan CM, Rivera EA. A systematic review of trauma-focused interventions for domestic violence survivors. Chicago: National Center on Domestic Violence, Trauma & Mental Health. 2013. Available from: http://www.nationalcenterdvtraumamh.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/NCDVTMH_EBPLitReview2013.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  50. 50.
    Quadara A. Implementing trauma-informed systems of care in health settings: the WITH study. State of knowledge paper. Alexandria: Australia’s National Research Organization for Women’s Safety; 2015.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miller E, Jordan B, Levenson R, Silverman J. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception. 2010;81(6):457–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grace KT, Anderson JC. Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016;16:16.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tarzia L, Wellington M, Marino J, Hegarty K. ‘A huge, hidden problem’: Australian health practitioners’ views and understandings of reproductive coercion. Qual Health Res. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318819839.
  54. 54.
    Grace KT. Caring for women experiencing reproductive coercion. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016;61(1):112–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Miller E, Tancredi D, Decker MR, McCauley H, Jones K, Anderson H, et al. A family planning clinic-based intervention to address reproductive coercion: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2016;94(1):58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hegarty K, Tarzia L, Murray E, Valpied J, Humphreys C, Taft A, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a web-based healthy relationship tool and safety decision aid for women experiencing domestic violence (I-DECIDE). BMC Public Health. 2015;15(736).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ford-Gilboe M, Varcoe C, Scott-Storey K, Wuest J, Case J, Currie L, et al. A tailored online safety and health intervention for women experiencing intimate partner violence: the iCAN Plan 4 Safety randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(273):1–12.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Koziol-McLain J, Vandal A, Wilson D, Nada-Raja S, Dobbs T, McLean C, et al. Efficacy of a web-based safety decision aid for women experiencing intimate partner violence: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(1).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Glass N, Eden KB, Bloom T, Perrin N. Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Violence. 2010;25:1947–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Glass N, Perrin N, Hanson GC, Bloom T, Messing JT, Clough A, et al. The longitudinal impact of an internet safety decision aid for abused women. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):606–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zlotnick C, Tzilos Wernette G, Raker CA. A randomized controlled trial of a computer-based brief intervention for victimized perinatal women seeking mental health treatment. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-018-0895-1.
  62. 62.
    Tarzia L, Iyer D, Thrower E, Hegarty K. ‘Technology doesn’t judge you’: Young Australian women’s views on using the internet and smartphones to address intimate partner violence. J Technol Hum Serv. 2017;35(3):199–218.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tarzia L, Cornelio R, Forsdike K, Hegarty K. Women’s experiences receiving support online for intimate partner violence: how does it compare to face-to-face support from a health professional? Interact Comput. 2018;30(5):433–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Rivas C, Ramsay J, Sadowski L, Davidson L, Dunne D, Eldridge S, et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychosocial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3(12):CD005043.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    • Gupta J, Falb K, Ponta O, Xuan Z, Campos P, Gomez A, et al. A nurse-delivered, clinic-based intervention to address intimate partner violence among low-income women in Mexico City: findings from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2017;15(128) This study represents a robust trial of an advocacy intervention with a large sample size. It contradicts previous systematic review evidence (mostly small, low-quality trials) that suggests that advocacy interventions are effective for women experiencing DV. Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Stevens J, Scribano P, Marshall J, Nadkarni R, Hayes J, Kelleher K. A trial of telephone support services to prevent further intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women. 2015;21(12):1528–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sharps P, Bullock L, Campbell J, Alhusen J, Ghazarian S, Bhandari S, et al. Domestic violence enhanced perinatal home visits: the DOVE randomized clinical trial. J Women's Health. 2016;25(11):1129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rhodes K, Rodgers M, Sommers M, Hanlon A, Chittams J, Doyle A, et al. Brief motivational intervention for intimate partner violence and heavy drinking in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(5):466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rhodes K, Rodgers M, Sommers M, Hanlon A, Chittams J, Doyle A, et al., editors. Evaluating a motivational intervention for intimate partner violence & heavy drinking in emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. 38th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism; 2015; San Antonio Texas.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Tirado-Munoz J, Gilchrist G, Lligona E, Gilbert L, Torrens M. A group intervention to reduce intimate partner violence among female drug users. Results from a randomized controlled pilot trial in a community substance-abuse center. Adicciones. 2015;27(3):168–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Taft C, Creech S, Gallagher M, Macdonald A, Murphy C, Monson C. Strength at Home Couples program to prevent military partner violence: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016;84(11):935–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schumm J, O’Farrell T, Murphy M, Muchowski P. Partner violence among drug-abusing women receiving behavioral couples therapy versus individually-based therapy. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;92:1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Graham-Bermann S, Miller-Graff L. Community-based intervention for women exposed to intimate partner violence: a randomized control trial. J Fam Psychol. 2015;29(4):537–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Nixon R, Best T, Wilksch S, Angelakis S, Beatty L, Weber N. Cognitive processing therapy for the treatment of acute stress disorder following sexual assault: a randomised effectiveness study. Behav Chang. 2017;23(4):232–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Belleville G, Dube-Frenette M, Rousseau A. Efficacy of imagery rehearsal therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in sexual assault victims with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Stress. 2018;31:591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bacchus L, Bewley S, Fernandez C, et al. Health sector responses to domestic violence in Europe: a comparison of promising intervention models in maternity and primary care settings. London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2012.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Tarzia L, May C, Hegarty K. Assessing the feasibility of a web-based domestic violence intervention using chronic disease frameworks: reducing the burden of ‘treatment’ and promoting capacity for action in women abused by a partner. BMC Womens Health. 2016;16(73):1–9.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hegarty K, Tarzia L, Hooker L, Taft A. Interventions to support recovery after domestic and sexual violence in primary care. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016;28(5):519–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Reisenhofer S, Taft A. Women’s journey to safety - the transtheoretical model in clinical practice when working with women experiencing intimate partner violence: a scientific review and clinical guidance. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93(3):536–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Carlsen A, Salam M, Miller C, Lu D, Ngu A, Patel J, et al. #MeToo brought down 201 powerful men. Nearly half of their replacements are women. New York Times. 2018. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/23/us/metoo-replacements.html. Accessed 25 Oct 2018.
  81. 81.
    Mervosh S. Domestic violence awareness hasn’t caught up with #MeToo. Here’s why. New York Times. 2018. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/16/us/domestic-violence-hotline-me-too.html. Accessed 26 Oct 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General PracticeThe University of MelbourneCarltonAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Family Violence PreventionThe Royal Women’s HospitalParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations