Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain: Current Treatment Strategies and Future Options—a Literature Review
Purpose of Review
Many studies have demonstrated that discogenic low back pain is the most common type of chronic low back pain (CLBP), one of the major causes of disability, and has a major socioeconomic impact. Our aim is to review present therapeutic interventions for discogenic low back pain.
There are a multitude of treatments used in clinical practice to treat CLBP, but there is continued debate and lack of consensus among clinicians and the policy makers as to which modality is the best approach. Based on controlled evaluations, lumbar intervertebral discs have been shown to be the source of chronic back pain without disc herniation in 26 to 39% of patients. Treatment modalities include noninvasive treatments such as drug therapy, multiple physical modalities, and multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation; interventional modalities such as intradiscal therapies and epidural injections; and regenerative modalities with disc injections of various solutions; and, finally, surgical approaches such as fusion and artificial disc replacement, all of which are accompanied by significant discussion, limited evidence, and lack of consensus.
The results of this evaluation show that the evidence for drug therapy in chronic discogenic low back pain is limited; for multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, it is moderate; and for multiple physical and behavioral therapies, the evidence is limited. For intradiscal therapies, it is poor; for epidural injections, it is moderate; and for regenerative therapies, evidence levels of 3 to 4. The evidence for surgical fusions and disc replacement is similar, without superiority when compared with multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation, well-designed physical therapy, or epidural injections.
KeywordsIntervertebral disc Degeneration Diagnosis Treatment Discogenic low back pain
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Lei Zhao and Laxmaiah Manchikanti declare no conflict of interest. Dr. Kaye is a speaker for Merck. Dr. Abd-Elsayed is a consultant for Medtronic, StimWave, Avanos and Sollis.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 5.• Manchikanti L, Soin A, Benyamin RM, Singh V, Falco FJ, Calodney AK, et al. An update of the systematic appraisal of the accuracy and utility of discography in chronic spinal pain. Pain Physician. 2018;21:91–110 Important update on discography in chronic spinal pain.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.• Manchikanti L, Staats PS, Nampiaparampil DE, Hirsch JA. What is the role of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain: a systematic review of comparative analysis with fusion and disc arthroplasty. Korean J Pain. 2015;28:75–87 Important review on the role of epidurals in lumbar discogenic pain.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.• Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Benyamin RM, Boswell MV. Analysis of efficacy differences between caudal and lumbar interlaminar epidural injections in chronic lumbar axial discogenic pain: local anesthetic alone vs. local combined with steroids. Int J Med Sci. 2015;12:214–22 Important analysis of efficacy between caudal and lumbar interlaminar injections in discogenic pain.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.• Helm S 2nd, Simopoulos TT, Stojanovic MP, Abdi S, El Terany MA. Effectiveness of thermal annular procedures in treating discogenic low back pain. Pain Physician. 2017;20:447–70 Important review on thermal annular procedures for discogenic low back pain.Google Scholar
- 23.Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Benyamin RM, Hirsch JA. Declining utilization of percutaneous epidural adhesiolysis in Medicare population: evidence-based or over-regulated? IPM Reports. 2018;2:9–18.Google Scholar
- 24.Manchikanti MV, Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Pampati V, Hirsch JA. Usage patterns of sacroiliac joint injections – a comparative evaluation of pre and post Affordable Care Act in Medicare population. IPM Reports. 2018;2:157–66.Google Scholar
- 25.Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Benyamin RM, Hirsch JA. Cost calculation methodology exacerbates site-of-service differentials by 10- to 18-fold for soft tissue and joint injections in hospital outpatient departments. IPM Reports. 2017;1:183–9.Google Scholar
- 27.• Manchikanti L, Knezevic NN, Boswell MV, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. Epidural injections for lumbar radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2016;19:E365–410 Systematic review on epidural injections for spinal stenosis and lumbar radiculopathy.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Manchikanti L, Nampiaparampil DE, Manchikanti KN, Falco FJE, Singh V, Benyamin RM, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of saline, local anesthetics, and steroids in epidural and facet joint injections for the management of spinal pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:S194–235.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Kaye AD, Manchikanti L, Novitch MB, Mungrue IN, Anwar M, Jones MR, et al. Responsible, safe, and effective use of antithrombotics and anticoagulants in patients undergoing interventional techniques: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) guidelines. Pain Physician. 2019;22:S75–S128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Vu Tran Z, Ivashchenko A, Brooks L. Sacroiliac joint fusion methodology - minimally invasive compared to screw-type surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician. 2019;22:29–40.Google Scholar
- 72.Leavitt SB. NSAID dangers may limit pain-relief options. Pain-Topics http://updates.pain-topics.org
- 79.Furlan AD, Yazdi F, Tsertsvadze A, Gross A, Van Tulder M, Santaguida L, et al. Complementary and alternative therapies for back pain II. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010;194:1–764.Google Scholar
- 81.Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, Smeets RJ, Ostelo RW, Guzman J, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;9:CD000963.Google Scholar
- 85.Manchikanti L, Falco FJE, Pampati V, Cash KA, Benyamin RM, Hirsch JA. Cost utility analysis of caudal epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, axial or discogenic low back pain, central spinal stenosis, and post lumbar surgery syndrome. Pain Physician. 2013;16:E129–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 90.Desai MJ, Kapural L, Petersohn JD, Vallejo R, Menzies R, Creamer M, et al. A prospective, randomized, multi-center, open-label clinical trial comparing intradiscal biacuplasty to conventional medical management for discogenic lumbar back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:1065–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 96.Guo J, Wang Y, Chen ZQ, Liu BW, Yang M, Bai ZL. Effect of radiofrequency versus anterior discectomy and posterior lumbar fixation on discogenic low back pain. J Clin Rehabil Tissue Eng Res. 2007;11:2205–8.Google Scholar