Screening Gene Knockout Mice for Variation in Bone Mass: Analysis by μCT and Histomorphometry
- 78 Downloads
Purpose of review
The international mouse phenotyping consortium (IMPC) is producing defined gene knockout mouse lines. Here, a phenotyping program is presented that is based on micro-computed tomography (μCT) assessment of distal femur and vertebra. Lines with significant variation undergo a computer-based bone histomorphometric analysis.
Of the 220 lines examined to date, approximately 15% have a significant variation (high or low) by μCT, most of which are not identified by the IMPC screen. Significant dimorphism between the sexes and bone compartments adds to the complexity of the skeletal findings. The μCT information that is posted at www.bonebase.org can group KOMP lines with similar morphological features. The histological data is presented in a graphic form that associates the cellular features with a specific anatomic group.
The web portal presents a bone-centric view appropriate for the skeletal biologist/clinician to organize and understand the large number of genes that can influence skeletal health. Cataloging the relative severity of each variant is the first step towards compiling the dataset necessary to appreciate the full polygenic basis of degenerative bone disease.
KeywordsIMPC and KOMP Bone phenotyping μCT Histomorphometry Web portal
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
David Rowe, Seung-Hyun Hong, Caibin Zhang, Dong-Guk Shin, Renata Rydzik, Li Chen, Zhihua Wu, Gaven Garland, Dana Godfrey, and John Sundberg declare no conflict of interest. Cheryl Ackert-Bicknell reports grants from National Institutes of Health/NIAMS during the conduct of the study. Douglas Adams reports grants from National Institutes of Health.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Weinstein, S.L. and E.H. Yelin. The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States (BMUS). United States Bone and Joint Initiative 2014 [cited 2014; Third Edition:[Available from: http://www.boneandjointburden.org/2014-report/if0/health-care-utilization-and-economic-cost.
- 2.Jacobs, J.J., et al., Beyond the decade: strategic priorities to reduce the burden of musculoskeletal disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013. 95(17): p. e1251–6. 3748998.Google Scholar
- 3.• Alonso N, Ralston SH. Unveiling the mysteries of the genetics of osteoporosis. J Endocrinol invest. 2014;37(10):925–34. Until reference 4 is published, this is the most recent overview of the clinical linkage studies that identify gentic loci that impact skeletal variation. The goal is to associate the GWAS studies in humans to the KOMP data in mice. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Qaseem A, Forciea MA, McLean RM, Denberg TD, for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(11):818–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Brommage R, et al. High-throughput screening of mouse gene knockouts identifies established and novel skeletal phenotypes. Bone Res. 2014;(2):14034–40. 4472125Google Scholar
- 16.• Freudenthal B, et al. Rapid phenotyping of knockout mice to identify genetic determinants of bone strength. J Endocrinol. 2016;231(1):R31–46. This is the most recent overview of the various IMPC-relatd bone phenotyping programs with particular emphasis on the mechanical and structural aspects of bone. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.• Meehan TF, et al. Disease model discovery from 3,328 gene knockouts by The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Nat Genet. 2017;49(8):1231–8. This is the most recent update of the IMPC screening activity. There is no mention of skeletal disorders in the screen, which emphasizes the need for a bone-focused component to this international project. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Hong SH, et al. Computer-automated static, dynamic and cellular bone histomorphometry. J Tissue Sci Eng. 2012;(Suppl 1):004.Google Scholar
- 21.Dyment NA, Jiang X, Chen L, Hong SH, Adams DJ, Ackert-Bicknell C, et al. High-throughput, multi-image cryohistology of mineralized tissues. J Vis Exp. 2016;(115)Google Scholar
- 37.Chen Z, Su L, Xu Q, Katz J, Michalek SM, Fan M, et al. IL-1R/TLR2 through MyD88 divergently modulates Osteoclastogenesis through regulation of nuclear factor of activated T cells c1 (NFATc1) and B lymphocyte-induced maturation protein-1 (Blimp1). J Biol Chem. 2015;290(50):30163–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Vallet M, Soares DC, Wani S, Sophocleous A, Warner J, Salter DM, et al. Targeted sequencing of the Paget’s disease associated 14q32 locus identifies several missense coding variants in RIN3 that predispose to Paget’s disease of bone. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(11):3286–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Kemp JP, Medina-Gomez C, Estrada K, St Pourcain B, Heppe DHM, Warrington NM, et al. Phenotypic dissection of bone mineral density reveals skeletal site specificity and facilitates the identification of novel loci in the genetic regulation of bone mass attainment. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(6):e1004423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.• Adams DJ, Rowe DW, Ackert-Bicknell CL. Genetics of aging bone. Mamm Genome. 2016;27(7–8):367–80. Besides providing the bone phenotypic changes with aging, the paper provides a concise comparison of the BMD measurement by DXA and cortical bone measurement by μCT. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 58.Sims NA, Martin TJ. Coupling signals between the osteoclast and osteoblast: how are messages transmitted between these temporary visitors to the bone surface? Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:41.Google Scholar
- 60.Andersen TL, Hauge EM, Rolighed L, Bollerslev J, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Delaisse JM. Correlation between absence of bone remodeling compartment canopies, reversal phase arrest, and deficient bone formation in post-menopausal osteoporosis. Am J Pathol. 2014;184(4):1142–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar