Advertisement

Current Oncology Reports

, 21:107 | Cite as

Poor-Performance Status Assessment of Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Remains Vague and Blurred in the Immunotherapy Era

  • Alex Friedlaender
  • Giuseppe Luigi Banna
  • Lucio Buffoni
  • Alfredo AddeoEmail author
Lung Cancer (H Borghaei, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Lung Cancer

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In the latest decade, the introduction of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. First-line ICIs or chemo-ICI trials have demonstrated OS advantages but the accrual was limited to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)0-1 patients. ICI studies have for the vast majority excluded patients with poor performance status. PS 2 particularly is known as a negative prognostic factor for survival and a predictive factor of adverse events and poor response to treatments. Data on the activity of ICIs in PS2 patients are limited and come from heterogeneous meta-analyses and small phase II or expanded access trials. Often, terms such as “unfit” or “frail” ascertain the eligibility of patients to undergo cytotoxic chemotherapy, without specifying PS.

Recent Findings

Other tools exist to aid in decision-making, and one simple, rapid, and validated screening test for frailty is the FRAIL scale consisting of 5 straightforward questions that can be self-administered and may represent an efficient and cost-effective way to screen large groups of patients for frailty. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a widely used method to determine the medical, psychological, and functional capabilities of older patients. However, CGA is time-consuming and this could represent a real barrier to its adoption in clinical practice. For this reason, a quick screening tool, the G8 questionnaire, has been developed and demonstrated validity also in a younger population. A complementary tool to assess patients’ frailty is Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) which has become the most widely used clinical index for a variety of disorders and cancers. Yet, none of these tools has been validated as predictive in ICI.

Summary

In conclusion, solid data regarding the benefit of ICIs in ECOG PS2 NSCLC patients are currently lacking and the role of immunotherapy remains uncertain for PS2 patients. Prospective randomized trials addressing this question are warranted or ongoing. However, we are concerned that without a more extensive and objective assessment of patients’ fitness and frailty by using and validating appropriate tools a clear answer may not come to light.

Keywords

Performance status Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Frail Unfit Immunotherapy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Alex Friedlaender has received compensation from Roche, Pfizer, Astellas and Bristol-Myers Squibb for service as a consultant.

Giuseppe Luigi Banna has received compensation from Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen-Cilag and Roche for participating on advisory boards.

Lucio Buffoni has received compensation from Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim for participating on advisory boards.

Alfredo Addeo has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, and has received compensation from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Takeda, Pfizer, Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim for participating on advisory boards.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Cheng TY, Cramb SM, Baade PD, et al. The international epidemiology of lung cancer: latest trends, disparities, and tumor characteristics. J Thorac Oncol : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2016;11:1653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Addeo A, Banna GL, Metro G, Di Maio M. Chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2019;9:264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landi L, Tiseo M, Chiari R, et al. Activity of the EGFR-HER2 dual inhibitor afatinib in EGFR-mutant lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clin Lung Cancer. 2014;15:411–7 e414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Banna GL, Passiglia F, Colonese F, et al. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a tool to improve patients’ selection. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018;129:27–39. Important tool to better select patients to Immune checkpoint inhibitors.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Novello S, Barlesi F, Califano R, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2016;27:v1–v27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hanna N, Johnson D, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35:3484–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    • Ettinger DS, Wood DE, Aisner DL, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer, version 5.2017, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compre Cancer Netw : JNCCN. 2017;15:504–35. Guidelines showing the lack of strong data about activity in patients with NSCLC and performance status.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lilenbaum RC, Cashy J, Hensing TA, et al. Prevalence of poor performance status in lung cancer patients: implications for research. J Thorac Oncol : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2008;3:125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the eastern cooperative oncology group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5:649–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gajra A, Marr AS, Ganti AK. Management of patients with lung cancer and poor performance status. J Natl Compre Cancer Netw : JNCCN. 2014;12:1015–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Su C, Zhou F, Shen J, et al. Treatment of elderly patients or patients who are performance status 2 (PS2) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations - still a daily challenge. Eur J Cancer. 2017;83:266–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Passaro A, Spitaleri G, Gyawali B, de Marinis F. Immunotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with performance status 2: clinical decision making with scant evidence. J Clin Oncol : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2019;37:1863–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ethun CG, Bilen MA, Jani AB, et al. Frailty and cancer: implications for oncology surgery, medical oncology, and radiation oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:362–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morley JE, Vellas B, van Kan GA, et al. Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14:392–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, et al. The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008;12:29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, et al. Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2005;55:241–52. Stregthening the importnace and the role of CGA as an assesment tool in the geriatric population.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamaker ME, Mitrovic M, Stauder R. The G8 screening tool detects relevant geriatric impairments and predicts survival in elderly patients with a haematological malignancy. Ann Hematol. 2014;93:1031–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soubeyran P, Bellera C, Goyard J, et al. Screening for vulnerability in older cancer patients: the ONCODAGE Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kenis C, Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, et al. Performance of two geriatric screening tools in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2014;32:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agemi Y, Shimokawa T, Sasaki J, et al. Prospective evaluation of the G8 screening tool for prognostication of survival in elderly patients with lung cancer: a single-institution study. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0210499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schulkes KJG, Souwer ETD, van Elden LJR, et al. Prognostic value of geriatric 8 and identification of seniors at risk for hospitalized patients screening tools for patients with lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18:660–6 e661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    •• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83. This is the milestone for the development of an the tool to assess comorbidities.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stavem K, Hoel H, Skjaker SA, Haagensen R. Charlson comorbidity index derived from chart review or administrative data: agreement and prediction of mortality in intensive care patients. Clin Epidemiol. 2017;9:311–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao L, Leung LH, Wang J, et al. Association between Charlson comorbidity index score and outcome in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17:112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Muchnik E, Loh KP, Strawderman M, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in real-world treatment of older adults with non-small cell lung Cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67:905–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Planchard D, Popat S, Kerr K, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology. 2018;29:iv192–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Friedlaender
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Luigi Banna
    • 2
  • Lucio Buffoni
    • 3
  • Alfredo Addeo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Oncology DepartmentGeneva University HospitalGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Oncology DepartmentUnited Lincolnshire NHS Hospital TrustLincolnUK
  3. 3.Oncology DepartmentSan Luigi Hospital University of TurinTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations