Electronic Assessment of Physical Decline in Geriatric Cancer Patients
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to explore state-of-the-art remote monitoring and emerging new sensing technologies for in-home physical assessment and their application/potential in cancer care. In addition, we discuss the main functional and non-functional requirements and research challenges of employing such technologies in real-world settings.
With rapid growth in aging population, effective and efficient patient care has become an important topic. Advances in remote monitoring and in its forefront in-home physical assessment technologies play a fundamental role in reducing the cost and improving the quality of care by complementing the traditional in-clinic healthcare. However, there is a gap in medical research community regarding the applicability and potential outcomes of such systems.
While some studies reported positive outcomes using remote assessment technologies, such as web/smart phone-based self-reports and wearable sensors, the cancer research community is still lacking far behind. Thorough investigation of more advanced technologies in cancer care is warranted.
KeywordsIn-home patient monitoring Remote physical assessment Cancer management Wireless health Aging Wearable sensors Smart-home technology Self-report
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Ramin Fallahzadeh, Hassan Ghasemzadeh, and Armin Shahrokni declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S, Ganz PA. Delivering high-quality cancer care [internet]. In: Challenges of an aging population. Board on Health Care Services. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2013. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18359.Google Scholar
- 2.Hurria A. Improving the quality of cancer care in an aging population. JAMA [Internet]. 2013;310:1795. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280416%5Cn. http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/Journals/JAMA/928522/jvp130139.pdf.
- 3.Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP, et al. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2011;29(25):3457–65. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810685%5Cn, http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3624700. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Schneider EB, Hyder O, Brooke BS, Efron J, Cameron JL, Edil BH, et al. Patient readmission and mortality after colorectal surgery for colon cancer: impact of length of stay relative to other clinical factors. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):390–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.12.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Greenblatt DY, Weber SM, O’Connor ES, LoConte NK, Liou J-I, Smith MA. Readmission after colectomy for cancer predicts one-year mortality. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2010;251(4):659–69. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2951007&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d3d27c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Spoelstra SL, Given BA, Given CW, Grant M, Sikorskii A, You M, et al. An intervention to improve adherence and management of symptoms for patients prescribed oral chemotherapy agents: an exploratory study. Cancer Nurs [Internet]. 2013;36:18–28. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Molassiotis A, Brearley S, Saunders M, Craven O, Wardley A, Farrell C, et al. Effectiveness of a home care nursing program in the symptom management of patients with colorectal and breast cancer receiving oral chemotherapy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2009;27:6191–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19917849 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mohan P, Marin D, Sultan S, Deen A. MediNet: personalizing the self-care process for patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease using mobile telephony. Eng Med Biol Soc 2008. EMBS 2008. 30th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE [Internet]. 2008;755–758. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19162765.
- 12.Nagai N, Fujii Y, Ueda H, Maru K, Kumakura S. PC-based monitoring system for efficient use of day care centers for elderly people. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. [Internet]. 2010;2:204–8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042810000376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Marques MR, Raymundo TM, Santana CS. Use of sensors systems to monitor the mobility of elderly. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. IOP Publishing; 2013 [cited 2017 Sep 11];477:12010. Available from: http://stacks.iop.org/1742-6596/477/i=1/a=012010?key=crossref.9b3bc7cc32691741ad02acbfca63ab4b.
- 17.Seto E, Leonard KJ, Masino C, Cafazzo JA, Barnsley J, Ross HJ. Attitudes of heart failure patients and health care providers towards mobile phone-based remote monitoring. J Med Internet Res 2010;12.Google Scholar
- 19.Fallahzadeh R, Pedram M, Ghasemzadeh H. SmartSock: a wearable platform for context-aware assessment of ankle edema. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2016;6302–6.Google Scholar
- 21.Klasnja P, Hartzler A, Powell C, Pratt W, et al. Supporting cancer patients’ unanchored health information management with mobile technology. AMIA Annual Symp. Proc./AMIA Symp. Symp. [Internet]. 2011;2011:732–41. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed10&NEWS=N&AN=22195130 Google Scholar
- 22.Cheng C, Stokes TH, Wang MD. CaREMOTE: the design of a cancer reporting and monitoring telemedicine system for domestic care. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2011:3168–3171.Google Scholar
- 24.Mooney KH, Beck SL, Wong B, Dunson W, Wujcik D, Whisenant M, et al. Automated home monitoring and management of patient-reported symptoms during chemotherapy: results of the symptom care at home RCT. Cancer Med. 2017;6(3):537–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Liptrott S, Bee P, Lovell K. Acceptability of telephone support as perceived by patients with cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017; https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12643.
- 27.Cowie J, McCann L, Maguire R, Kearney N, Connaghan J, Paterson C, et al. Real-time management of chemotherapy toxicity using the Advanced Symptom Management System (ASyMS). J. Decis. Syst. [Internet]. 2013;22:43–52. Available from: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84878253093&partnerID=40&md5=e11a527d125b782325fd7dc7af1b49f7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.• Maguire R, Fox PA, McCann L, Miaskowski C, Kotronoulas G, Miller M, et al. The eSMART study protocol: a randomised controlled trial to evaluate electronic symptom management using the advanced symptom management system (ASyMS) remote technology for patients with cancer. BMJ Open. 2017;7:7–9. This is the largest on-going study measuring oncology patient outcomes using an electronic symptom management system through randomised controlled trials in multiple clinical sites across Europe. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Derawi M, Bours P. Gait and activity recognition using commercial phones. Comput Secur [Internet]. 2013;39:137–44. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167404813000953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2013.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.• Sprint G, Cook D, Fritz R, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Detecting health and behavior change by analyzing smart home sensor data. 2016 I.E. Int. Conf. Smart Comput. IEEE. 2016. p. 1–3. This paper is the first feasibility study on using smarthome technology for health monitoring in oncology patients. Google Scholar
- 37.van Kasteren Y, Bradford D, Zhang Q, Karunanithi M, Ding H. Understanding smart home sensor data for ageing in place through everyday household routines: a mixed method case study. JMIR mHealth uHealth [Internet]. 2017;5:e52. Available from: http://mhealth.jmir.org/2017/6/e52/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.• Phillips SM, Dodd KW, Steeves J, McClain J, Alfano CM, McAuley E. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in breast cancer survivors: new insight into activity patterns and potential intervention targets. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015;138:398–404. This is an intensive study on activity patterns in breast cancer survivors using wearable tracking devices. It highlights the importance of emphasizing on monitoring less-intensive activities in oncology patients. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Maddocks M, Byrne A, Johnson CD, Wilson RH, Fearon KCH, Wilcock A. Physical activity level as an outcome measure for use in cancer cachexia trials: a feasibility study. Support Care Cancer [Internet]. 2010;18:1539–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19956982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Smith, WA, Nolan VG, Robison LL, Hudson MM, Ness KK. Physical activity among cancer survivors and those with no history of cancer—a report from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2006. Am J Transl Res. 2011;3(4):345-50.Google Scholar
- 43.Weiss GM, Timko JL, Gallagher CM, Yoneda K, Schreiber AJ. Smartwatch-based activity recognition: a machine learning approach. 2016 IEEE-EMBS Int Conf Biomed Heal Informatics [Internet]. 2016:426–429. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7455925/.
- 44.Johnston AH, Weiss GM. Smartwatch-based biometric gait recognition. 2015 I.E. 7th Int Conf Biometrics Theory, Appl Syst. BTAS. 2015.Google Scholar
- 46.Shoaib M, Scholten H, Havinga PJM. Towards physical activity recognition using smartphone sensors. 2013 I.E. 10th Int. Conf. Ubiquitous Intell. Comput. 2013 I.E. 10th Int. Conf. Auton. Trust. Comput. [Internet]. 2013. p. 80–87. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6726194/.
- 47.Lara OD, Labrador MA. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials [Internet]. 2012:1–18. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6365160.
- 48.Patel S, Park H, Bonato P, Chan L, Rodgers M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. [Internet]. 2012;9:21. Available from: http://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1743-0003-9-21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.• Seneviratne S, Hu Y, Nguyen T, Lan G, Khalifa S, Thilakarathna K, et al. A survey of wearable devices and challenges. IEEE Commun Survecognition using wearable sensors Tutorials [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Sep 11];1–1. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7993011. This paper is one of the two largest recent survey reports of state-of-the-art wearable technologies being developed, its potentials and limitations in various applications.
- 50.• Lara OD, Labrador MA. A survey on human activity recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials [Internet]. 2013;15:1192–1209. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6365160. This paper is one of the two largest recent survey reports of emerging wearable and e-textile technologies being proposed, its potential advantages, existing challenges, and limitations in different domains.
- 54.Wu F, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Zhong H. Development of a wearable-sensor-based fall detection system. Int J Telemed Appl 2015;2015.Google Scholar
- 57.Trojaniello D, Cereatti A, Bourke A. A wearable system for the measurement of the inter-foot distance during gait. 20th IMEKO T4 Int. Symp. [Internet]. 2014. 765–769. Available from: http://www.imeko.org/publications/tc4-2014/IMEKO-TC4-2014-337.pdf.
- 59.Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, Yoshioka M, Yoshitake Y, Shindo M, et al. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Br. J. Nutr. [Internet]. 2004;91:235. Available from: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0007114504000327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 61.Arcelus A, Goubran R, Jones MH, Knoefel F. Integration of smart home technologies in a health monitoring system for the elderly. Proc.–21st Int Conf Adv Inf Netw Appl Work AINAW’07. 2007. p. 820–825.Google Scholar
- 67.Rus S, Braun A, Kuijper A. E-textile couch: towards smart garments integrated furniture. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics). 2017. p. 214–224.Google Scholar
- 68.Heneghan C, Redmond S. Sleep monitoring system [Internet]. US Pat. 8,784,324. 2014 [cited 2017 Sep 11]. Available from: https://www.google.com/patents/US8784324.
- 69.Han C, Wu K, Wang Y, Ni LM. WiFall: device-free fall detection by wireless networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2014—IEEE Conf Comput Commun [Internet]. 2014;16:271–279. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6847948/.
- 71.Kumar S, Nilsen WJ, Abernethy A, Atienza A, Patrick K, Pavel M, et al. Mobile health technology evaluation: the mHealth evidence workshop. Am J Prev Med. 2013:228–236.Google Scholar
- 73.Fallahzadeh R, Ghasemzadeh H. Personalization without user interruption. In: Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Cyber-Physical Syst.—ICCPS ’17 [Internet]. New York: ACM Press; 2017. p. 293–302. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3055004.3055015.Google Scholar
- 74.Stisen A, Blunck H, Bhattacharya S, Prentow TS, Kjærgaard MB, Dey A, et al. Smart devices are different: assessing and mitigating mobile sensing heterogeneities for activity recognition. Proc. 13th ACM Conf. Embed. Networked Sens. Syst.—SenSys ’15 [Internet]. 2015;127–140. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2809695.2809718.
- 75.Rokni SA, Ghasemzadeh H. Plug-n-learn: automatic learning of computational algorithms in human-centered internet-of-things applications. Proc. 53rd Annu. Des. Autom. Conf. [Internet]. 2016;139:1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2898066.
- 76.National Expenditure for Cancer Sites. Cancer prevalence and cost of care projections [Internet]. [cited 2017 Sep 11]. Available from: https://costprojections.cancer.gov/expenditures.html.
- 79.Faust L, Purta R, Hachen D, Striegel A, Poellabauer C, Lizardo O, et al. Exploring compliance: observations from a large scale fitbit study. Proc. 2nd Int. Work. Soc. Sens.—Soc. [Internet]. 2017. p. 55–60. Available from: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3055601.3055608.
- 80.• Sun V, Dumitra S, Ruel N, Lee B, Melstrom L, Melstrom K, et al. Wireless monitoring program of patient-centered outcomes and recovery before and after major abdominal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. [Internet]. 2017;81:1061–1066. Available from: http://archsurg.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx? https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1519. This paper is among the first studies that investigates the outcome of using wireless monitoring and self-reported surveys with preoperative and postoperative patients. It shows the potential of using such systems in identifying high-risk populations who may need additional interventions.