Music Therapy and Music-Based Interventions for Movement Disorders

  • Kerry Devlin
  • Jumana T. Alshaikh
  • Alexander PantelyatEmail author
Neurorehabilitation and Recovery (J Krakauer and T Kitago, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Neurorehabilitation and Recovery


Purpose of Review

There is emerging evidence that music therapy and other methods using music and rhythm may meaningfully improve a broad range of symptoms in neurological and non-neurological disorders. This review highlights the findings of recent studies utilizing music and rhythm-based interventions for gait impairment, other motor symptoms, and non-motor symptoms in Parkinson disease (PD) and other movement disorders. Limitations of current studies as well as future research directions are discussed.

Recent Findings

Multiple studies have demonstrated short-term benefits of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait parameters including gait freezing in PD, with recent studies indicating that it may reduce falls. Demonstration of benefits for gait in both dopaminergic “on” and “off” states suggests that this intervention can be a valuable addition to the current armamentarium of PD therapies. There is also emerging evidence of motor and non-motor benefits from group dancing, singing, and instrumental music performance in PD. Preliminary evidence for music therapy and music-based interventions in movement disorders other than PD (such as Huntington disease, Tourette syndrome, and progressive supranuclear palsy) is limited but promising.


Music therapy and other music and rhythm-based interventions may offer a range of symptomatic benefits to patients with PD and other movement disorders. Studies investigating the potential mechanisms of music’s effects and well-controlled multicenter trials of these interventions are urgently needed.


Music therapy Movement disorders Parkinson disease Huntington disease Rhythmic cueing Rhythmic auditory stimulation 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Kerry Devlin, Jumana Alshaikh, and Alexander Pantelyat each declare no potential conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article is a review and reports only studies approved by editorial boards based on peer reviews. When we cited our own work, all the procedures performed in the studies involving human materials or animals were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of our institution, with informed consent obtained from patients and approval from ethics committees.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    • Cheever T, Taylor A, Finkelstein R, et al. NIH/Kennedy center workshop on music and the brain: finding harmony. Neuron. 2018;97(6):1214–8 This is a white paper broadly outlining the knowledge gaps in the mechanisms of music’s effect on the body and the effects of music-based interventions in improving health; findings from the workshop summarized in this paper informed a subsequent request for grant applications related to Music in Health (NIH/NEA). CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones CR, Jahanshahi M. Motor and perceptual timing in Parkinson’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;829:265–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashoori A, Eagleman DM, Jankovic J. Effects of auditory rhythm and music on gait disturbances in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2015;6:234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alves-Pinto A, Turova V, Blumenstein T, Thienel A, Wohlschlager A, Lampe R. fMRI assessment of neuroplasticity in youths with neurodevelopmental-associated motor disorders after piano training. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2015;19(1):15–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Batson G, Soriano C, Laurienti P, Burdette J, Migliarese S, Hristov N. Effects of group-delivered improvisational dance on balance in adults with middle stage Parkinson’s disease: a two-phase pilot with fMRI case study. J Park Dis. 2013;3:192.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braunlich K, Seger CA, Jentink KG, Buard I, Kluger BM, Thaut MH. Rhythmic auditory cues shape neural network recruitment in Parkinson’s disease during repetitive motor behavior. Eur J Neurosci. 2018.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma LY, Chen XD, He Y, Ma HZ, Feng T. Disrupted brain network hubs in subtype-specific Parkinson’s disease. Eur Neurol. 2017;78(3–4):200–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Hoemberg V. Neurobiological foundations of neurologic music therapy: rhythmic entrainment and the motor system. Front Psychol. 2015;6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thaut MH, McIntosh KW, McIntosh GC, Hoemberg V. Auditory rhythmicity enhances movement and speech motor control in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Funct Neurol. 2001;16(2):163–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thaut MH. The discovery of human auditory-motor entrainment and its role in the development of neurologic music therapy. Prog Brain Res. 2015;217:253–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thaut MH, Kenyon GP, Schauer ML, McIntosh GC. The connection between rhythmicity and brain function. IEEE. 1999;18(2):101–8.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buard I, Dewispelaere WB, Thaut M, Kluger BM. Preliminary neurophysiological evidence of altered cortical activity and connectivity with neurologic music therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:105.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Nozaradan S, Peretz I, Mouraux A. Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm. J Neurosci. 2012;32(49):72–81 This small study utilizing surface electroencephalography in healthy controls provides indirect evidence of neuronal rhythmic entrainment, with emergence of spontaneous internal representation of beat frequencies at multiples of beat frequencies being heard (e.g., hearing 1.25-Hz frequency and averaged EEG frequency spectrum peaks at 1.25 Hz, 2.5 Hz, 5 Hz, and 10 Hz). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clements-Cortes A, Bartel L. Are we doing more than we know? Possible mechanisms of response to music therapy. Frontiers in medicine. 2018;5:255.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vitorio R, Stuart S, Gobbi LTB, Rochester L, Alcock L, Pantall A. Reduced gait variability and enhanced brain activity in older adults with auditory cues: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(11):976–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schaefer RS. Auditory rhythmic cueing in movement rehabilitation: findings and possible mechanisms. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences. 2014;369(1658):20130402.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Angelucci F, Fiore M, Ricci E, Padua L, Sabino A, Tonali PA. Investigating the neurobiology of music: brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulation in the hippocampus of young adult mice. Behav Pharmacol. 2007;18(5–6):491–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thaut CP, Rice RR. Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS). In: New York: Oxford University Press. 2014.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    De l'Etoile SK. Neurologic music therapy: a scientific paradigm for clinical practice. Music and Medicine. 2010;2(2):78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dreu Md, Kwakkel G, Wegen, Erwin E H van. Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) in gait rehabilitation for patients with Parkinson’s disease: a research perspective. In: New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bella SD, Benoit CE, Farrugia N, Keller PE, Obrig H, Mainka S, et al. Gait improvement via rhythmic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease is linked to rhythmic skills. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benoit CE, Dalla Bella S, Farrugia N, Obrig H, Mainka S, Kotz SA. Musically cued gait-training improves both perceptual and motor timing in Parkinson’s disease. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:494.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Arias P, Cudeiro J. Effect of rhythmic auditory stimulation on gait in parkinsonian patients with and without freezing of gait. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9675.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thaut MH, Rice RR, Braun Janzen T, Hurt-Thaut C, McIntosh GC. Rhythmic auditory stimulation for reduction of falls in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33(1):34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghai S, Ghai I, Schmitz G, Effenberg AO. Effect of rhythmic auditory cueing on parkinsonian gait: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):506.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McIntosh GC, Brown SH, Rice RR, Thaut MH. Rhythmic auditory-motor facilitation of gait patterns in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(1):22–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pau M, Corona F, Pili R, Casula C, Sors F, Agostini T, et al. Effects of physical rehabilitation integrated with rhythmic auditory stimulation on spatio-temporal and kinematic parameters of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2016;7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rochester L, Hetherington V, Jones D, Nieuwboer A, Willems AM, Kwakkel G, et al. The effect of external rhythmic cues (auditory and visual) on walking during a functional task in homes of people with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(5):999–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thaut MH, McIntosh GC, Rice RR, Miller RA, Rathbun J, Brault JM. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in gait training for Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord. 1996;11(2):193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Willems AM, Nieuwboer A, Chavret F, Desloovere K, Dom R, Rochester L, et al. The use of rhythmic auditory cues to influence gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease, the differential effect for freezers and non-freezers, an explorative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28(11):721–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Plotnik M, Shema S, Dorfman M, Gazit E, Brozgol M, Giladi N, et al. A motor learning-based intervention to ameliorate freezing of gait in subjects with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol. 2014;261(7):1329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hausdorff JM, Lowenthal J, Herman T, Gruendlinger L, Peretz C, Giladi N. Rhythmic auditory stimulation modulates gait variability in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26(8):2369–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kadivar Z, Corcos DM, Foto J, Hondzinski JM. Effect of step training and rhythmic auditory stimulation on functional performance in Parkinson patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(7):626–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Benoit CE, Farrugia N, Schwartze M, Dalla Bella S, Kotz S. Non-gait related benefits of auditory cueing in Parkinson’s disease. J Park Dis. 2013;3:138.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Thaut MH, Abiru M. Rhythmic auditory stimulation in rehabilitation of movement disorders: a review of current research. Music Percept. 2010;27(4):263–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Matsumoto L, Magalhaes G, Antunes GL, Torriani-Pasin C. Effect of rhythmic auditory cue on gait in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Revista Neurociencias. 2014;22(3):404–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cubo E, Leurgans S, Goetz CG. Short-term and practice effects of metronome pacing in Parkinson’s disease patients with gait freezing while in the ‘on’ state: randomized single blind evaluation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004;10(8):507–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Baker K, Rochester L, Nieuwboer A. The immediate effect of attentional, auditory, and a combined cue strategy on gait during single and dual tasks in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bella SD, Dotov D, Bardy B, de Cock VC. Individualization of music-based rhythmic auditory cueing in Parkinson’s disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1423:308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cock CD, Dotov DG, Ihalainen P, et al. Rhythmic abilities and musical training in Parkinson’s disease: do they help? NPJ Parkinson’s disease. 2018;4:8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ready EA, McGarry LM, Rinchon C, Holmes JD, Grahn JA. Beat perception ability and instructions to synchronize influence gait when walking to music-based auditory cues. Gait Posture. 2019;68:555–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bukowska AA, Krężałek P, Mirek E, Bujas P, Marchewka A. Neurologic music therapy training for mobility and stability rehabilitation with Parkinson’s disease - a pilot study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;9.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wittwer JE, Winbolt M, Morris ME. A home-based, music-cued movement program is feasible and may improve gait in progressive supranuclear palsy. Front Neurol. 2019;10:116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    • van Bruggen-Rufi MC, Vink AC, Wolterbeek R, Achterberg WP, Roos RA. The effect of music therapy in patients with J Huntingtons Dis: a randomized controlled trial. J Huntingtons Dis. 2017;6(1):63–72 This was a randomized controlled trial that evaluated the effect of group music therapy when compared with group recreational therapy of social-cognitive functioning in HD and showed no difference in outcomes between both groups. Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wittwer JE, Webster KE, Hill K. Rhythmic auditory cueing to improve walking in patients with neurological conditions other than Parkinson’s disease—what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(2):164–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thaut MH, Miltner R, Lange HW, Hurt CP, Hoemberg V. Velocity modulation and rhythmic synchronization of gait in Huntington’s disease. Mov Disord. 1999;14(5):808–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hove MJ, Suzuki K, Uchitomi H, Orimo S, Miyake Y. Interactive rhythmic auditory stimulation reinstates natural 1/f timing in gait of Parkinson’s patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dauvergne C, Begel V, Geny C, Puyjarinet F, Laffont I, Dalla BS. Home-based training of rhythmic skills with a serious game in Parkinson’s disease: usability and acceptability. Ann PM&R. 2018;61(6):380–5.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zhu S, Ellis RJ, Schlaug G, Ng YS, Wang Y. Validating an iOS-based rhythmic auditory cueing evaluation (iRACE) for Parkinson’s disease. MM 2014 - Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Multimedia. 2014:487–496.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cancela J, Moreno EM, Arredondo MT, Bonato P. Designing auditory cues for Parkinson’s disease gait rehabilitation. Conference proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5852–5.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lopez WOC, Higuera CAE, Fonoff ET, de OS, Albicker U, JAE M. Listenmee® and listenmee® smartphone application: synchronizing walking to rhythmic auditory cues to improve gait in parkinson's disease. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;37:147–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mazilu S, Blanke U, Dorfman M, et al. A wearable assistant for gait training for Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait in out-of-the-lab environments. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. 2015;5(1).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    •• Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Randomized controlled trial of community-based dancing to modify disease progression in Parkinson disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26(2):132–43 This is a 12-month study of Argentine Tango (AT) vs. passive control in PD that demonstrated clinically and statistically significant motor benefits from AT at 12 months for gait (including freezing), balance, forward and dual task walking velocities, and 9-hole PEG test of upper extremity function. The assessments were performed in the dopaminergic off state and suggest that sustained twice-weekly AT may modify PD progression. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    • Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Are the effects of community-based dance on Parkinson disease severity, balance, and functional mobility reduced with time? A 2-year prospective pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2014;20(10):757–63 This small study represents the longest published follow up of a continued music-based intervention in PD to date and demonstrated both objective and patient-reported motor and non-motor ADL benefits sustained for 2 years since beginning Argentine Tango intervention. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Beevers WA, Morris ME. A structural analysis of music in tango dance classes for Parkinson’s disease. Aust J Music Ther. 2017;28:67–85.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bognar S, DeFaria AM, O'Dwyer C, et al. More than just dancing: experiences of people with Parkinson’s disease in a therapeutic dance program. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(11):1073–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    • McNeely ME, Mai MM, Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Differential effects of tango versus dance for PD in Parkinson disease. Front Ag Neurosci. 2015;7:239 This is one of a small number of studies comparing 2 active music-based interventions in PD. MDS-UPDRS motor ratings and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go test time) improved in the Tango group and worsened in the Dance for PD group, while gait velocity was not affected by either intervention. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Barnish J, Atkinson RA, Barran SM, Barnish MS. Potential benefit of singing for people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J Park Dis. 2016;6(3):473–84.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stegemöller EL, Radig H, Hibbing P, Wingate J, Sapienza C. Effects of singing on voice, respiratory control and quality of life in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(6):594–600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Han EY, Yun JY, Chong HJ, Choi KG. Individual therapeutic singing program for vocal quality and depression in Parkinson’s disease. J Mov Disord. 2018;11(3):121–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Butala A, Swaminathan A, Dunlop S, et al. Parkinsonics-a prospective, randomized, blinded, cross-over trial of group singing for motor and non-motor symptoms in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD). Mov Disord. 2017;32.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    • Harrison EC, Horin AP, Earhart GM. Internal cueing improves gait more than external cueing in healthy adults and people with Parkinson disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15525 This study suggests that internal cueing (singing while walking) may improve gait parameters in PD to a greater extent than external rhythmic cues. Internal cueing was associated with greater improvements in gait velocity, cadence, and stride length in the backward direction, and reduced variability in both forward and backward walking, with greater improvements observed among older controls and PD participants.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ang K, Maddocks M, Xu H, Higginson IJ. The effectiveness of singing or playing a wind instrument in improving respiratory function in patients with long-term neurological conditions: a systematic review. J Music Ther. 2017;54(1):108–31.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pacchetti C, Mancini F, Aglieri R, Fundaro C, Martignoni E, Nappi G. Active music therapy in Parkinson’s disease: an integrative method for motor and emotional rehabilitation. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(3):386–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Pfeiffer RF. Non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22 Suppl 1:119.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    • Spina E, Barone P, Mosca LL, et al. Music therapy for motor and nonmotor symptoms of parkinson's disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(9):e39 This was a randomized controlled trial that evaluated effects of several MT interventions in PD on motor function, quality of life, and cognition. Results showed short-term improvements in quality of life and cognition with MT that disappeared shortly after completion of MT. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Pohl P, Dizdar N, Hallert E. The ronnie Gardiner rhythm and music method - a feasibility study in Parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(26):2197–204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Elefant C, Baker FA, Lotan M, Lagesen SK, Skeie GO. The effect of group music therapy on mood, speech, and singing in individuals with Parkinson’s disease--a feasibility study. J Music Ther. 2012;49(3):278–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Haneishi E. Effects of a music therapy voice protocol on speech intelligibility, vocal acoustic measures, and mood of individuals with Parkinson’s disease. J Music Ther. 2001;38(4):273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lyons KE, Hamburg J, Clair AA. A feasibility study of the effects of music and movement on physical function, quality of life, depression, and anxiety in patients with Parkinson disease. Music Med. 2012;4(1):49–55.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pantelyat A, Syres C, Reichwein S, Willis A. DRUM-PD: the use of a drum circle to improve the symptoms and signs of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016;3(3):243–9.
  72. 72.
    Lee JH. The effects of music on pain: a meta-analysis. J Music Ther. 2016;53(4):430–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Skogar O, Lokk J. Pain management in patients with Parkinson’s disease: challenges and solutions. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9(1):469–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Daveson B. Findings of an audit of music therapy referrals in a specialist in-patient setting for 16 patients with advancing Huntington’s disease. Aust J Music Ther. 2007;18:2–19.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    O'Kelly J, Bodak R. Development of the music therapy assessment tool for advanced Huntington’s disease: a pilot validation study. J Music Ther. 2016;53(3):232–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    • Bodeck S, Lappe C, Evers S. Tic-reducing effects of music in patients with Tourette’s syndrome: self-reported and objective analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2015;352(1-2):41-47. This study evaluated the effects of musical performance, listening to music, and mental imagery of music on tic severity in Tourette’s syndrome. There was significant tic reduction with all musical interventions. The most profound effect was with musical performance. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kerry Devlin
    • 1
  • Jumana T. Alshaikh
    • 2
  • Alexander Pantelyat
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Peabody InstituteJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations