Advertisement

Phosphodiesterase Inhibition in the Treatment of Preeclampsia: What Is New?

  • Anne Brandolt Larré
  • Fernando Sontag
  • Débora Montenegro Pasin
  • Nathália Paludo
  • Rayssa Ruszkowski do Amaral
  • Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
  • Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo
Preeclampsia (V Garovic, Section Editor)
  • 98 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Preeclampsia

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The present study intends to review the possibility of using phosphodiesterase inhibitors as a treatment option for preeclampsia, addressing potential risks and benefits.

Recent Findings

Preeclampsia is the most common hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, often responsible for severe maternal and fetal complications, which can lead to early pregnancy termination and death. Despite the numerous studies, its pathophysiology is still unclear, although it seems to involve a multiplicity of complex factors related to angiogenesis, ineffective vasodilation, oxidative stress, inflammatory cytokines, and endothelial dysfunction. It has been hypothetically suggested that the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors is capable of improving placental and fetal perfusion, contributing to gestational scenario, by decreasing the symptomatology and severity of this syndrome. In this literature review, it has been found that most of the studies were conducted in animal models, and there is still lack of evidence supporting its use in clinical practice. Research in human indicates conflicting findings; randomized controlled trials were scarce and did not demonstrate any benefit in morbidity or mortality. Data regarding to pathophysiological and interventional research are described and commented in this review.

Summary

The use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the treatment of preeclampsia is controversial and should not be encouraged taking into account recent data.

Keywords

Sildenafil Phosphodiesterase Hypertension, pregnancy-induced Models, animal 

Notes

Authors’ Contributions

Regarding authorship: Anne Brandolt Larré, Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa, Fernando Sontag, and Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo worked at conception, planning, writing the paper, and final version revising. Débora Montenegro Pasin, Nathália Paludo, and Rayssa Ruszkowski do Amaral worked at planning, writing the paper, and final version revising.

Financial Support and Sponsorship

Source of Support

Laboratory of Nephrology receives support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Research Support Foundation of the State of Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS). Poli-de-Figueiredo is a CNPq researcher.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors report any conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy, Hypertension in pregnancy, Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1122–31. This comprehensive guideline from The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists consists in an important tool to the definition, diagnosis, classification, prediction, and prevention of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It approaches clinical considerations and recommendations in different scenarios, regarding evaluation, managment, and treatment. Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:130–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, Roberts J, Sibai BM, Steyn W, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014;4:97–104. This statement from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy comprises an updated view over definition, classification, diagnostic criteria, and management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Considering previous key guidelines, it intends to give a new perspective over the disease in face of recent data, focusing mainly in the importance of proteinuria, antihypertensive treatment, and blood pressure target. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ACOG practice bulletin no. 33: diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:159–67.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Turner JA. Diagnosis and management of pre-eclampsia: an update. Int J Women’s Health. 2010;2:327–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salles AM, Galvão TF, Silva MT, Motta LCD, Pereira MG. Antioxidants for preventing preeclampsia: a systematic review. Sci World J. 2012;2012:243476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levine RJ, Maynard SE, Qian C, Lim KH, England LJ, Yu KF, et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:672–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Founds SA, Conley YP, Lyons-Weiler JF, Jeyabalan A, Hogge WA, Conrad KP. Altered global gene expression in first trimester placentas of women destined to develop preeclampsia. Placenta. 2009;30:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keravis T, Lugnier C. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) isozymes as targets of the intracellular signaling network: benefits of PDE inhibitors in various diseases and perspectives for future therapeutic developments. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;165:1288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amer MS. Cyclic nucleotides as targets for drug design. Adv Drug Res. 1977;12:1–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Conrad KP, Kerchner LJ, Mosher MD. Plasma and 24-h NOx and cGMP during normal pregnancy and preeclampsia in women on a reduced NOx diet. Am J Phys. 1999;277:48–57.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinheiro da Costa BE, Scocco C, Poli de Figueiredo CE, Guimaraes JA. Increased serum phosphodiesterase activity in women with pre-eclampsia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:577–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gamboa A, Shibao C, Diedrich A, Choi L, Pohar B, Jordan J, et al. Contribution of endothelial nitric oxide to blood pressure in humans. Hypertension. 2007;49:170–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khong TY, De Wolf F, Robertson WB, Brosens I. Inadequate maternal vascular response to placentation in pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and by small-for-gestational age infants. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93:1049–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    • Chaiworapongsa T, Chaemsaithong P, Yeo L, Romero R. Pre-eclampsia part 1: current understanding of its pathophysiology. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10:466–80. This review describes, mostly, the pathophysiology of preeclampsia disease, providing a very complete view over mechanisms and pathways involved in placental ischaemia, vascular remodeling, hypoxia, oxidative stress, inflammation, and immune and platelet activation. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brosens IA, Robertson WB, Dixon HG. The role of the spiral arteries in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol Annu. 1972;1:177–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redman CW, Sargent IL. Placental stress and pre-eclampsia: a revised view. Placenta. 2009;30:38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    •• Sasser JM, Murphy SR, Granger JP. Emerging drugs for preeclampsia--the endothelium as a target. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2015;20:527–30. This review focus especially on the importance of endothelial dysfunction to the development of preeclampsia, addressing emerging therapies such as the inhibition of endothelin type A and phosphodiesterase-5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anumba DO, Robson SC, Boys RJ, Ford GA. Nitric oxide activity in the peripheral vasculature during normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancy. Am J Phys. 1999;  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1999;277:848-54.
  20. 20.
    Knock GA, Poston L. Bradykinin-mediated relaxation of isolated maternal resistance arteries in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1668–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seligman SP, Buyon JP, Clancy RM, Young BK, Abramson SB. The role of nitric oxide in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:944–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaamash AH, Elsnosy ED, Makhlouf AM, Zakhari MM, Ibrahim OA, EL-dien HM. Maternal and fetal serum nitric oxide (NO) concentrations in normal pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, and eclampsia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;68:207–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murad F. Regulation of cytosolic guanylyl cyclase by nitric oxide: the NO-cyclic GMP signal transduction system. Adv Pharmacol. 1994;26:19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Moncada S, Higgs A. The l-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:2002–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schneider F, Lutun P, Baldauf JJ, Quirin L, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, et al. Plasma cyclic GMP concentrations and their relationship with changes of blood pressure levels in pre-eclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996;75:40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kouvelas D, Goulas A, Papazisis G, Sardeli C, Pourzitaki C. PDE5 inhibitors: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological profile. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15:3464–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Downinga JW, Ramasubramaniana R, Johnsona RF, Minztera BH, Paschalla RL, Sundellb HW, et al. Hypothesis: selective phosphodiesterase-5 inhibition improves outcome in preeclampsia. Med Hypotheses. 2004;63:1057–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Everett TR, Wilkinson IB, Lees CC. Drug development in preeclampsia: a ‘no go’ area? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:50–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Larré AB, Parisotto A, Rockenbach BF, Pasin DM, Capellari C, Escouto DC, et al. Phosphodiesterases and preeclampsia. Med Hypotheses. 2017;108:94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Sibley CP. Treating the dysfunctional placenta. Endocr J. 2017;234(2):R81–97. This review describes preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction’ pathophysiology, while highlights therapeutic targets and potential drug therapies, proposing experimental pathways for treatment design. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tanaka H, Kubo M, Nii M, Maki S, Umekawa T, Ikeda T. Treatment using tadalafil for severe pre-eclampsia with fetal growth restiction. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;43:1205–8.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Podjarny E, Losonczy G, Baylis C. Animal models of preeclampsia. Semin Nephrol. 2004;24:596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    George EM, Palei AC, Dent EA, Granger JP. Sildenafil attenuates placental ischemia-induced hypertension. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys. 2013;305:397–403.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Motta C, Grosso C, Zanuzzi C, Molinero D, Picco N, Bellingeri R, et al. Effect of sildenafil on pre-eclampsia-like mouse model induced by L-NAME. Reprod Domest Anim. 2015;50:611–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soobryan N, Murugesan S, Phoswa W, Gathiram P, Moodley J, Mackraj I. The effects of sildenafil citrate on uterine angiogenic status and serum inflammatory markers in an L-NAME rat model of pre-eclampsia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;795:101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baijnath S, Murugesan S, Mackraj I, Gathiram P, Moodley J. The effects of sildenafil citrate on urinary podocin and nephrin mRNA expression in an L-NAME model of pre-eclampsia. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;427(1–2):59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yoshikawa K, Umekawa T, Maki S, Kubo M, Nii M, Tanaka K, et al. Tadalafil improves l-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester-induced preeclampsia with fetal growth restriction-like symptoms in pregnant mice. Am J Hypertens. 2017;31:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ramesar SV, Mackraj I, Gathiram P, Moodley J. Sildenafil citrate decreases sFlt-1 and sEng in pregnant L-NAME treated Sprague–Dawley rats. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157:136–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Burke SD, Zsengellér ZK, Khankin EV, Lo AS, Rajakumar A, DuPont JJ, et al. Soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 promotes angiotensin II sensitivity in preeclampsia. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2561–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    He H, Venema VJ, Gu X, Venema RC, Marrero MB, Caldwell RB. Vascular endothelial growth factor signals endothelial cell production of nitric oxide and prostacyclin through flk-1/KDR activation of c-Src. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, Hanai J, Mammoto T, Kim YM, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med. 2006;12:642–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Stanley JL, Sulek K, Andersson IJ, Davidge ST, Kenny LC, Sibley CP, et al. Sildenafil therapy normalizes the aberrant metabolomic profile in the COMT−/− mouse model of preeclampsia/fetal growth restriction. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stanley JL, Andersson IJ, Poudel R, Rueda-Clausen CF, Sibley CP, Davidge ST, et al. Sildenafil citrate rescues fetal growth in the catechol-O-methyl transferase knockout mouse model. Hypertension. 2012;59:1021–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Turgut NH, Temiz TK, Bagcivan I, Turgut B, Gulturk S, Karadas B. The effect of sildenafil on the altered thoracic aorta smooth muscle responses in rat pre-eclampsia model. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;589:180–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baijnath S, Soobryan N, Mackraj I, Gathiram P, Moodley J. The optimization of a chronic nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition model of pre-eclampsia by evaluating physiological changes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;182:71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramesar SV, Mackraj I, Gathiram P, Moodley J. Sildenafil citrate improves fetal outcomes in pregnant, L-NAME treated, Sprague–Dawley rats. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;149:22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Herraiz S, Pellicer B, Serra V, Cauli O, Cortijo J, Felipo V, et al. Sildenafil citrate improves perinatal outcome in fetuses from pre-eclamptic rats. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;11:1394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gillis EE, Mooney JN, Garrett MR, Granger JP, Sasser JM. Sildenafil treatment ameliorates the maternal syndrome of preeclampsia and rescues fetal growth in the dahl salt–sensitive rat. Hypertension. 2016;67:647–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ounsted MK, Moar VA, Good FJ, Redman CW. Hypertension during pregnancy with and without specific treatment; the development of the children at the age of four years. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cauli O, Herraiz S, Pellicer B, Pellicer A, Felipo A. Treatment with sildenafil prevents impairment of learning in rats born to pre-eclamptic mothers. Neuroscience. 2010;171:506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Acauan Filho BJ, Pinheiro da Costa BE, Ogando PB, Vieira MC, Antonello IC, Poli-de-Figueiredo CE. Serum nitrate and NOx levels in preeclampsia are higher than in normal pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2016;35:226–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sohlberg S, Wikström AK, Olovsson M, Lindgren P, Axelsson O, Mulic-Lutvica A, et al. In vivo 31P-MR spectroscopy in normal pregnancy, early and late preeclampsia: a study of placental metabolism. Placenta. 2014;35:318–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Samangaya RA, Wareing M, Skillern L, Philip N, Baker PN. Phosphodiesterase inhibitor effect on small artery function in preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2011;30:144–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wareing M, Myers JE, O’hara M, Kenny LC, Warren AY, Taggart MJ, et al. Effects of a phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitor on endothelium-dependent relaxation of myometrial small arteries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wareing M, Myers JE, O'Hara M, Kenny LC, Taggart MJ, Skillern L, et al. Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and omental and placental small artery function in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;127:41–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Karasu E, Kayacan N, Sadan G, Dinc B. Endothelial dysfunction in the human umbilical artery due to preeclampsia can be prevented by sildenafil. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2012;34:79–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Reyna-Villasmil E, Torres-Cepeda D, Peña-Paredes E, Mejía-Montilla J, Reyna-Villasmil N, González-Rodríguez P. Efecto de citrato de sildenafil sobre el flujo sanguíneo de las arterias uterina, umbilical y cerebral media fetal en preeclámpticas / effect of sildenafil cytrate on blood flow of uterine, umbilical artery and cerebral media fetal artery in preeclamptic patients. Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez. 2008;68:187–94.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dastjerdi MV, Hosseini S, Bayani L. Sildenafil citrate and uteroplacental perfusion in fetal growth restriction. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17:632–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kakigano A, Tomimatsu T, Mimura K, Kanayama T, Fujita S, Minato K, et al. Drug repositioning for preeclampsia therapeutics by in vitro screening: phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor vardenafil restores endothelial dysfunction via induction of placental growth factor. Reprod Sci. 2015;22:1272–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    • Trapani A Jr, Gonçalves LF, Trapani TF, Vieira S, Pires M, Pires MM. Perinatal and hemodynamic evaluation of sildenafil citrate for preeclampsia treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:253–9. One of the most recent clinical trials regarding the use of sildenafil citrate in the treatment of preeclampsia. Benefits were observed in blood pressure control during the first day after administration; and in pregnancy prolongation of approximately 4 days. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Samangaya RA, Mires G, Shennan A, Skillern L, Howe D, McLeod A, et al. A randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil for the treatment of preeclampsia. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;28:369–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Brandolt Larré
    • 1
  • Fernando Sontag
    • 1
  • Débora Montenegro Pasin
    • 1
  • Nathália Paludo
    • 2
  • Rayssa Ruszkowski do Amaral
    • 2
  • Bartira Ercília Pinheiro da Costa
    • 3
    • 4
  • Carlos Eduardo Poli-de-Figueiredo
    • 3
  1. 1.Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health Sciences (Nephrology), Laboratory of Nephrology–School of MedicinePontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Internal MedicinePontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  4. 4.São Lucas HospitalPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations