Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 34, Issue 1, pp 78–86 | Cite as

Object–Color Stroop Task to Assess Selective Attention in “True” and “Legally Considered” Juvenile Delinquents

  • Tanusree MoitraEmail author
  • Diganta Mukherjee
  • Garga Chatterjee


The present study compared selective attention processing among juvenile delinquents of two different citizenships and matched control groups. The sample consisted of 70 “true” juvenile delinquents (Indian citizen—charged for theft, rape or murder), 54 “legally considered” delinquents (Bangladesh citizens—charged only with illegal immigration), and 70 matched control group of Indian citizens. They were tested on object–color Stroop task designed specifically with objects typically found in South Asia. Results show that participants had taken less time in typical condition (for example, red color of red apple) compared to atypical condition (blue color of red apple). This behavioral characteristic is more specifically present in Bangladeshi delinquents and non-delinquent controls, while Indian delinquents are different from both on this measure. Demographic variables also have an influence on performance. Differences in selective attention processing were found between “true” and “legally considered” juvenile delinquents. Furthermore, the age of participants also had an influence on performance. These findings together suggest establishment of separate observation homes for juvenile delinquents. Furthermore, this is the first study to test response modulation hypothesis among offenders with psychopathic traits in an Asian country.


Juvenile delinquent Stroop task Selective attention Bangladesh India 



TM received the research grant. She conceived study, participated in its design and data collection, performed the statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. DM helped in statistical analyses and critically reviewed the results. GC participated in its design and coordination, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Funding Acknowledgement

This study was funded by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (SR/CSRI/PDF - 01/2013).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Baskin-Sommers AR, Zeier JD, Newman JP (2009) Self-reported attentional control differentiates the major factors of psychopathy. Personal Individ Differ 47(6):626–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskin-Sommers A, Curtin J, Li W, Newman J (2012) Psychopathy-related differences in selective attention are captured by an early event-related potential. Personal Disord 3:370–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cedrus Corporation (1997) SuperLab experimental laboratory software. Phoenix, AZ: CedrusGoogle Scholar
  4. Cliffordson C, Gustafsson J (2008) Effects of age and schooling on intellectual performance: estimates obtained from analysis of continuous variation in age and length of schooling. Intelligence 36:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diamond A (2002) Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to juvenile adulthood: cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In: Stuss DT, Knight RT (eds) Principles of frontal lobe function. Oxford University Press, London, pp 466–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falch T, Sandgren Massih S (2011) The effect of education on cognitive ability. Econ Inq 49:838–856. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrington D (1987) Implications of biological findings for criminological research. The causes of crime: new biological approaches. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Hare R, Jutai J (1988) Psychopathy and cerebral asymmetry in semantic processing. Personal Individ Differ 9:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hiatt K, Schmitt W, Newman J (2004) Stroop tasks reveal abnormal selective attention among psychopathic offenders. Neuropsychology 18:50–59. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoppenbrouwers SS, Stigchel S, Slotboom J, Dalmaijer ES, Theeuwes J (2015) Disentangling attentional deficits in psychopathy using visual search: failures in the use of contextual information. Personal Individ Differ 86:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurt J, Naglieri J (1992) Performance of delinquent and nondelinquent males on planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks. J Clin Psychol 48:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jacobsen L, Pugh K, Constable R, Westerveld M, Mencl E (2007) Functional correlates of verbal memory deficits emerging during nicotine withdrawal in abstinent adolescent cannabis users. Biol Psychiatry 61:31–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jutai J, Hare R (1983) Psychopathy and selective attention during performance of a complex perceptual-motor task. Psychophysiology 20:146–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. (2000). Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. Government of India. Retrived from (
  15. Krusemark EA, Kiehl KA, Newman JP (2016) Endogenous attention modulates early selective attention in psychopathy: an ERP investigation. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 16(5):779–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. La Heij W, Boelens H (2011) Color–object interference: further tests of an executive control account. J Exp Child Psychol 108:156–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Luna B, Garver K, Urban T, Lazar N, Sweeney J (2004) Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Dev 75:1357–1372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacLeod C (1992) The Stroop task: the “gold standard” of attentional measures. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:12–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maylor E, Lavie N (1998) The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychol Aging 13:563–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Naor-Raz G, Tarr M, Kersten D (2003) Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception 32:667–680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman J (1998) Psychopathic behavior: an information processing perspective. In: Cooke DJ, Forth AE, Hare RD (eds) Psychopathy: theory, research and implications for society. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 81–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newman J, Lorenz A (2003) Response modulation and emotion processing: implications for psychopathy and other dysregulatory psychopathology. In: Davidson RJ, Scherer K, Goldsmith HH (eds) Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford University Press, London, pp 1043–1067Google Scholar
  23. Newman J, Patterson M, Kosson D (1987) Response perseveration in psychopaths. J Abnorm Psychol 96:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newman J, Schmitt W, Voss M (1997) Processing of contextual cues in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic offenders. J Abnorm Psychol 106:563–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman JP, Curtin JJ, Bertsch JD, Baskin-Sommers AR (2010) Attention moderates the fearfulness of psychopathic offenders. Biol Psychiatry 67(1):66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prevor M, Diamond A (2005) Color-object interference in young children: a Stroop effect in children 3 1/2–6 1/2years old. Cogn Dev 20:256–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Racer KH, Gilbert TT, Luu P, Felver-Gant J, Abdullaev Y, Dishion TJ (2011) Attention network performance and psychopathic symptoms in early adolescence: an ERP study. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39:100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Raven J (2000) The Raven’s progressive matrices: change and stability over culture and time. Cogn Psychol 41:1–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rocha NBF, Marques AB, Fortuna RB, Antunes A, Hoaken PNS (2014) Effectiveness of cognitive remediation for female inmates: a pilot study. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol 25:224–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross, E. (2012) Are offence-focused correctional rehabilitation programs affecting inmates’ executive cognitive functions? (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Western Ontario, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  31. Sadeh N, Verona E (2008) Psychopathic traits associated with abnormal selective attention and impaired cognitive control. Neuropsychology 22:669–680. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salihov S, Kerr M, Stattin H (2014) Under the surface of adolescent psychopathic traits: high – anxious and low – anxious subgroups in a community sample of youths. J Adolesc 37(5):681–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sargunaraj D, Kumaraiah V (1991) The reliability of translations of STAI, CSAQ, EPI, and I-E Scale. J Personal Clin Stud 7:99–101Google Scholar
  34. Segalowitz S, Dywan J (2009) Individual differences and developmental change in the ERN response: implications for models of ACC function. Psychol Res 73(6):857–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stroop R (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18:643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thoma R, Monnig M, Lysne P, Ruhl D, Pommy J, Bogenschutz M, Tonigan S, Yeo R (2011) Adolescent substance abuse: the effects of alcohol and marijuana on neuropsychological performance. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 35:39–46. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United Nations Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division.(2009) International migration. Retrieved from ( )
  38. Vitale J, Newman J, Bates J, Goodnight J, Dodge K, Pettit G (2005) Deficient behavioral inhibition and anomalous selective attention in a community sample of adolescents with psychopathic traits and low-anxiety traits. J Abnorm Child Psychol 33:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vitale J, Brinkley C, Hiatt K, Newman J (2007) Abnormal selective attention in psychopathic female offenders. Neuropsychology 21:301–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeier J, Newman J (2013) Feature-based attention and conflict monitoring in criminal offenders: interactive relations of psychopathy with anxiety and externalizing. J Abnorm Psychol 122:797–806. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Police and Criminal Psychology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations