Shoot/No-Shoot Decisions: Dissociation, Judgment, and Assailant/Weapon Characteristics
Shoot/no-shoot decisions in law enforcement are under increasing scrutiny nationwide. However, little research has addressed the ways in which factors related to assailants and weapons influence these decisions. In the present research, images of adult male, adult female, and juvenile (female) assailants presented simulated direct threats to respondents. Assailants were armed with a pistol, a knife, or a glass bottle. Respondents were asked to indicate whether or not they would shoot in the presence of these threats. Respondents also completed the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES). Tendencies toward dissociation, a process generating a sense of unreality, influenced the performance of males who shot; more dissociated men took more time to fire. However, dissociation did not influence the performance of women. Sex and youth of the assailant had no effects on the shoot/no-shoot performance of either men or women, and oddly, weapon type had no significant effect on women’s performance, although men were more likely to fire on an assailant of either age or sex armed with a gun or knife than a bottle. These results are discussed in terms of relevance for law enforcement training and for juridical proceedings in shoot/no-shoot cases.
KeywordsShoot/no-shoot decisions Tactical decisions Analogue/appraisal theory Dissociation
The authors would like to acknowledge that this research was conducted in laboratory facilities directed by the third author at the California State University, Fresno, and was also conducted under normal research auspices for faculty of that institution.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
This project received full ethical approval from the Human Subjects Committee, Department of Psychology, College of Science and Mathematics, California State University, Fresno. The project was approved as a “minimal risk” procedure for human subjects.
All human subjects of this research were provided with full informed consent according to the ethical standards of the American Psychological Association, standard for this field. All were adults, and all indicated that they had fully read the Informed Consent form and the research descriptions contained therein, and signed the form to give their consent to participation in the research.
- Cardena E (1997) Dissociative disorders: phantoms of the self. In: Turner SM, Hersen M (eds) Adult psychopathology and diagnosis (3rd ed.), 400. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McRae K, Sharps MJ, Power J, Newton A (2013) Eyewitness memory for typical and atypical weapons in cognitive context. J Investig Psychol Offender Profiling 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1410
- McRae K, Sharps MJ, Kimura N (2015) Error and accuracy in memory for firearms. Forensic Examiner 24:1–6Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ (2003) Aging, representation, and thought: gestalt and feature-intensive processing. Transaction Publishers, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
- Sharps MJ (2012) The mental edge: effective cognitive processing in law enforcement. The Police Chief 79:100–105Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ (2017) Processing under pressure: stress, memory, and decision in law enforcement, 2nd edn. Looseleaf Law, FlushingGoogle Scholar
- Sharps MJ, Hess AB (2008) To shoot or not to shoot: response and interpretation of response to armed assailants. Forensic Examiner 17:53–64Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ, Barber TL, Stahl H, Villegas AB (2003) Eyewitness memory for weapons. Forensic Examiner 12:34–37Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ, Liao SW, Herrera MR (2013) It’s the end of the world, and they don’t feel fine: the psychology of December 21, 2012. Skept Inq 37:34–39Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ, Liao SW, Herrera MR (2014) Remembrance of apocalypse past: the psychology of true believers when nothing happens. Skept Inq 38:54–58Google Scholar
- Sharps MJ, Liao SW, Herrera MR (2016a) Dissociation and paranormal beliefs: toward a taxonomy of belief in the unreal. Skept Inq 40:40–44Google Scholar