Advertisement

Serial Homicide Perpetrators’ Self-Reported Psychopathy and Criminal Thinking

  • Scott E. CulhaneEmail author
  • Stephannie Walker
  • Meagen M. Hildebrand
Article

Abstract

The current research reports 61 male serial murderers’ responses to self-report questionnaires designed to assess levels of psychopathy and criminal thinking. Three separate measures of psychopathy were included. Contrary to our predictions, results indicated that our sample of serial murderers did not demonstrate strong evidence of psychopathy. Rather, the percentage of inmates who could be classified as having psychopathic tendencies is on par with the general population of prisoners. Only half of the participants had an interpretable criminal thinking style scale. Temperament and power issues were the two factors of greatest significance for understanding the serial homicide perpetrators’ criminal cognition. In line with expectations, multiple significant correlations were observed for the measures. Implications and limitations of the research are discussed.

Keywords

Serial murder Psychopathy Criminal thinking PICTS PPI-R 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Thanks are extended to Adrienne Freng for her assistance in the development of the project and to Kathyrn Nicola, Janelle Klemm, Alicia Young, Ellen Watson, Rebecca Luze, and Alek Johnson for their assistance in data collection.

Funding Information

This research was supported in part by the President Tom Buchanan’s Foundation Fund at the University of Wyoming, the Arts and Sciences Dean’s Office at the University of Wyoming, and the Department of Criminal Justice at the University of Wyoming.

References

  1. Andrews DA, Bonta J (1994) The psychology of criminal conduct. Anderson, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  2. Busch KA, Cavanaugh JL (1986) The study of multiple murder: preliminary examination of the interface between epistemology and methodology. J Interpers Violence 1(1):5–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/088626086001001002 Google Scholar
  3. Butcher JN, Dahlstrom WG, Graham JR, Tellegen A, Kaemmer B (1989) MMPI-2: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: manual for administration and scoring. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleckley H (1976) The mask of sanity, 5th edn. Mosby, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. Clow KA, Scott HS (2007) Psychopathic traits in nursing and criminal justice majors: a pilot study. Psychol Rep 100(2):495–498.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.100.2.495-498 Google Scholar
  6. Cornell DG, Miller C, Benedek EP (1988) MMPI profiles of adolescents charged with homicide. Behav Sci Law 6(3):401–407.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370060308 Google Scholar
  7. Cornell DG, Warren J, Hawk G, Stafford E, Oram G, Pine D (1996) Psychopathy in instrumental and reactive violent offenders. J Consult Clin Psychol 64(4):783–790.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.4.783 Google Scholar
  8. Culhane SE, Hildebrand MM, Walker S, Gray MJ (2014) MMPI-2 characteristics of male serial murderers [electronic version]. Appl Psychol Crim Just 10(1):21–45Google Scholar
  9. Culhane SE, Hildebrand MM, Mullings AF, Klemm J (2016) Self-reported disorders among serial homicide offenders: data from the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory—III. J Forensic Psychol Pract 16(4):268–286.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2016.1196099 Google Scholar
  10. DeLisi M (2009) Psychopathy is the unified theory of crime. Youth Violence Juvenile Justice 7(3):256–273.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204009333834 Google Scholar
  11. Edens JF, Buffington JK, Tomicic TL (2000) An investigation of the relationship between psychopathic traits and malingering on the Psychopathic Personality Inventory. Assessment 7(3):281–296.  https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700307 Google Scholar
  12. Forth AE, Book AS (2007) Psychopathy in youth: a valid construct. In: Hervé H, Yuille JC (eds) The psychopath: theory, research, and practice. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 369–387Google Scholar
  13. Fox JA, Levin J (1998) Multiple homicides: patterns of serial and mass murder. Crime Justice 23:407–455.  https://doi.org/10.1086/449274 Google Scholar
  14. Fox JA, Levin J (2015) Extreme killing: understanding serial and mass murder, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  15. Gendreau P, Little T, Goggin C (1996) A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works! Criminology 34(4):575–607.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01220.x Google Scholar
  16. Greene E, Heilbrun K (2011) Wrightsman’s psychology and the legal system, 7th edn. Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  17. Häkkänen-Nyholm H, Hare RD (2009) Psychopathy, homicide, and the courts: working the system. Crim Justice Behav 36(8):761–777.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809336946 Google Scholar
  18. Hare RD (1996) Psychopathy: a clinical construct whose time has come. Crim Justice Behav 23(1):25–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854896023001004 Google Scholar
  19. Hare RD (2003) The hare psychopathy checklist—revised manual, 2nd edn. Multi-Health Systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. Hare RD, McPherson LM (1984) Violent and aggressive behavior by criminal psychopaths. Int J Law Psychiatry 7(1):35–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(84)90005-0 Google Scholar
  21. Harris GT, Skilling TA, Rice ME (2001) The construct of psychopathy. Crime Justice 28:197–264.  https://doi.org/10.1086/652211 Google Scholar
  22. Hickey, E. (2010) Serial murderers and their victims (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. Hildebrand, M. M., & Culhane, S. E. (2015) Personality characteristics of the female serial murderer. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 5 (1), 34–50.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-04-2014-000710.1108/JCP-04-2014-0007
  24. Holmes, R. H., & Holmes, S. T. (2010) Serial murder (3rd. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Huss MT, Langhinrichsen-Rohling J (2000) Identification of the psychopathic batterer: the clinical, legal, and policy implications. Aggress Violent Behav 5:403–422Google Scholar
  26. Kraemer, G. W., Lord, W. D., & Heilbrun, K. (2004) Comparing single and serial homicide offenses. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 22(3), 325–343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.581
  27. Levenson MR, Kiehl KA, Fitzpatrick CM (1995) Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. J Pers Soc Psychol 68(1):151–158.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.151 Google Scholar
  28. Lilienfeld SO, Fowler KA (2006) The self-report assessment of psychopathy: problems, pitfalls, and promises. In: Patrick CJ (ed) Handbook of psychopathy. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 107–132Google Scholar
  29. Lilienfeld SO, Widows MR (2005) Professional manual of the psychopathic personality inventory—revised. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., LutzGoogle Scholar
  30. Mandracchia JT, Gonzalez RA, Patterson KL, Smith PN (2015) Psychopathy and criminogenic thinking in adult male prisoners. J Contemp Crim Just 31(4):409–425.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986215608472 Google Scholar
  31. Miller JD, Lynam DR (2012) An examination of the psychopathic personality inventory’s nomological network: a meta-analytic review. Personal Disord 3(3):305–326.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024567 Google Scholar
  32. Millon T, Millon C, Davis RD, Grossman S (2009) MCMI-III manual, 4th edn. Pearson, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Morton RJ, Hilts MA (eds) (2008) Serial murder: multi-disciplinary perspectives for investigators. National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Morton RJ, McNamara JJ (2005) Serial murder. In: Byard R, Corey T, Henderson C, Payne-James J (eds) Encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. Elsevier, London.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369399-3/00319-0 Google Scholar
  35. Morton RJ, Tillman JM, Gaines SJ (2014) Serial murder: pathways for investigations. National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime (NCAVC), Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  36. Neumann CS, Declercq F (2009) Latent variable models of the Self-Report of Psychopathy—III (SRP-III) across three large diverse samples and replication in an offender sample. Paper presented at the Biennial Conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy. New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  37. Paulhus DL, Hemphill JF, Hare RD (in press) Scoring manual for the Hare Self-Report Psychopathy Scale—III. Multi-Health Systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  38. Seibert LA, Miller JD, Few LR, Zeichner A, Lynam DR (2011) An examination of the structure of self-report psychopathy measures and their relations with general traits and externalizing behaviors. Personal Disord 2(3):193–208.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019232 Google Scholar
  39. Skrapec, C. A. (2001) Phenomenology and serial murder: Asking different Questions. Homicide Studies, 5(1), 46–63.Google Scholar
  40. Walters GD (1995) The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles: part I: reliability and preliminary validity. Crim Justice Behav 22(3):307–325.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022003008 Google Scholar
  41. Walters GD (2006) The psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles (PICTS) professional manual. Center for Lifestyle Studies, AllentownGoogle Scholar
  42. Walters GD (2012a) Criminal thinking and recidivism: meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggress Violent Behav 17(3):272–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.010 Google Scholar
  43. Walters GD (2012b) Psychopathy and crime: testing the incremental validity of PCL-R—measured psychopathy as a predictor of general and violent recidivism. Law Hum Behav 36(5):404–412.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093928 Google Scholar
  44. Walters GD, Geyer MD (2005) Construct validity of the psychological inventory of criminal thinking styles in relationship to the PAI, disciplinary adjustment, and program completion. J Pers Assess 84(3):252–260.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8403_04 Google Scholar
  45. Walters GD, Yurvati E (2017) Testing the construct validity of the PICTS proactive and reactive scores against six putative measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Psychol Crime Law 23(1):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1217335 Google Scholar
  46. Walters GD, Brinkley CA, Magaletta PR, Diamond PM (2008) Taxometric analysis of the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy scale. J Pers Assess 90(5):491–498.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802248828 Google Scholar
  47. Ward, J. H., Jr.. (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244Google Scholar
  48. Whited WH, Wagar L, Mandracchia JT, Morgan RD (2017) Partners or partners in crime? The relationship between criminal associates and criminogenic thinking. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 61(5):491–507.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15599605 Google Scholar
  49. Williamson SE, Hare RD, Wong S (1987) Violence: criminal psychopaths and their victims. Can J Behav Sci 19(4):454–462.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080003 Google Scholar
  50. Woodworth M, Porter S (2002) In cold blood: characteristics of criminal homicides as a function of psychopathy. J Abnorm Psychol 111(3):436–445.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843X.111.3.436 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Police and Criminal Psychology 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott E. Culhane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stephannie Walker
    • 2
  • Meagen M. Hildebrand
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeAustin Peay State UniversityClarksvilleUSA
  2. 2.Wake Forest School of MedicineWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA
  3. 3.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations