Advertisement

Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Pericardial Diseases

  • Michael Chetrit
  • Bo Xu
  • Beni R. Verma
  • Allan L. KleinEmail author
Echocardiography (JM Gardin and AH Waller, Section Editors)
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Echocardiography

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The diagnosis of pericardial syndromes, while occasionally straightforward, includes a wide range of pathologies and is often a well-recognized clinical challenge. The aim of this review is to highlight the key role of the various imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of the spectrum of pericardial diseases.

Recent Findings

Cardiac imaging has become an integral part of the diagnostic process often beginning with echocardiography and supported by advanced imaging modalities including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positive emission tomography. These modalities go beyond the simple identification of the pericardium, to identifying increased pericardial thickness, active pericardial edema and inflammation, and its effect on cardiac hemodynamics.

Summary

Multimodality imaging has significantly facilitated the diagnosis and long-term management of patients with pericardial diseases. The role of these imaging modalities in overall prognosis and prevention remains to be investigated.

Keywords

Acute pericarditis Constrictive pericarditis Tamponade Effusive constrictive Transient constrictive Pericardial effusion 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Michael Chetrit, Bo Xu, and Beni R. Verma declare that they have no conflict of interest. Allan L. Klein has received honoraria from Sobi and a research grant from Kiniksa.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Verhaert D, Gabriel RS, Johnston D, Lytle BW, Desai MY, Klein AL. The role of multimodality imaging in the management of pericardial disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. May 2010;3(3):333–43.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yared K, Baggish AL, Picard MH, Hoffmann U, Hung J. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):650–60.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Mallah MH, Almasoudi F, Ebid M, Ahmed AM, Jamiel A. Multimodality imaging of pericardial diseases. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017;19(12):89.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levy-Ravetch M, Auh YH, Rubenstein WA, Whalen JP, Kazam E. CT of the pericardial recesses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(4):707–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB, Yeh BM, Hetts SW, Higgins CB. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics. 2003;23:S167–80.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ling LH, Oh JK, Tei C, Click RL, Breen JF, Seward JB, et al. Pericardial thickness measured with transesophageal echocardiography: feasibility and potential clinical usefulness. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29(6):1317–23.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sechtem U, Tscholakoff D, Higgins CB. MRI of the normal pericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986;147(2):239–44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Xu B, Harb SC, Cremer PC. New insights into pericarditis: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017;19(7):60 Review on the pathophysiology of pericarditis.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Imazio M, Gaita F, LeWinter M. Evaluation and treatment of pericarditis: a systematic review. Jama. 2015;314(14):1498–506.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dudzinski DM, Mak GS, Hung JW. Pericardial diseases. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2012;37(3):75–118.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lange RA, Hillis LD. Clinical practice. Acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(21):2195–202.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    LeWinter MM. Clinical practice. Acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(25):2410–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Barón-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surg. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–64.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spodick DH. Acute pericarditis: current concepts and practice. Jama. 2003;289(9):1150–3.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klein AL, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):965–1012.e15.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Leary SM et al., Imaging the pericardium: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac computed tomography, Br J Radiol, vol. 83, no. 987. 36 Portland Place, London, W1B 1AT, (2010) pp. 194–205Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eitel I, et al. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA. 2011;306(3):277–86.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Young PM, Glockner JF, Williamson EE, Morris MF, Araoz PA, Julsrud PR, et al. MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation. Int J Card Imaging. Jun. 2012;28(5):1099–109.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zurick AO, Bolen MA, Kwon DH, Tan CD, Popovic ZB, Rajeswaran J, et al. Pericardial delayed hyperenhancement with CMR imaging in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing surgical pericardiectomy: a case series with histopathological correlation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(11):1180–91.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J. Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(3):569–74.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kojima S, Yamada N, Goto Y. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(5):373–4.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Imazio M, Cecchi E, Demichelis B, Ierna S, Demarie D, Ghisio A, et al. Indicators of poor prognosis of acute pericarditis. Circulation. 2007;115(21):2739–44.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Imazio M, Spodick DH, Brucato A, Trinchero R, Adler Y. Controversial issues in the management of pericardial diseases. Circulation. 2010;121(7):916–28.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Imazio M, Brucato A, Rovere ME, Gandino A, Cemin R, Ferrua S, et al. Contemporary features, risk factors, and prognosis of the post-pericardiotomy syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(8):1183–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cremer PC, Kumar A, Kontzias A, Tan CD, Rodriguez ER, Imazio M, et al. Complicated pericarditis: understanding risk factors and pathophysiology to inform imaging and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(21):2311–28.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Srichai MB. CMR imaging in constrictive pericarditis: is seeing believing? J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4(11. United States):1192–4.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ristic AD, et al. Triage strategy for urgent management of cardiac tamponade: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(34):2279–84.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weitzman LB, Tinker WP, Kronzon I, Cohen ML, Glassman E, Spencer FC. The incidence and natural history of pericardial effusion after cardiac surgery--an echocardiographic study. Circulation. 1984;69(3):506–11.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cosyns B, Plein S, Nihoyanopoulos P, Smiseth O, Achenbach S, Andrade MJ, et al. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) position paper: multimodality imaging in pericardial disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):12–31.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bogaert J, Francone M. Pericardial disease: value of CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(2):340–56.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, Parker LA, et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(21):1961–5.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oyama N, Oyama N, Komuro K, Nambu T, Manning WJ, Miyasaka K. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: anatomy and pathology. Magn Reson Med Sci. Dec. 2004;3(3):145–52.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tomoda H, Hoshiai M, Furuya H, Oeda Y, Matsumoto S, Tanabe T, et al. Evaluation of pericardial effusion with computed tomography. Am Heart J. 1980;99(6):701–6.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Himelman RB, Kircher B, Rockey DC, Schiller NB. Inferior vena cava plethora with blunted respiratory response: a sensitive echocardiographic sign of cardiac tamponade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12(6):1470–7.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Popp RL. Superior vena cava and hepatic vein Doppler echocardiography in healthy adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10(5):1032–9.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Picard MH, Sanfilippo AJ, Newell JB, Rodriguez L, Guerrero JL, Weyman AE. Quantitative relation between increased intrapericardial pressure and Doppler flow velocities during experimental cardiac tamponade. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18(1):234–42.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Calkins H, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Eur. Eur. pacing, arrhythmias, Card. Electrophysiol. J. Work. groups Card. pacing, arrhythmias, Card. Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2012;14(4):528–606.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berge KH, Lanier WL, Reeder GS. Occult cardiac tamponade detected by transesophageal echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992;67(7):667–70.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baxi AJ, Restrepo C, Mumbower A, McCarthy M, Rashmi K. Cardiac injuries: a review of multidetector computed tomography findings. Trauma Monthly. 2015;20(4):e19086.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xu Y, Xu Z, Wang Y. Cardiac tamponade due to pneumopericardium. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):924–6.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Shabetai R, Fowler NO, Guntheroth WG. The hemodynamics of cardiac tamponade and constrictive pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 1970;26(5):480–9.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Porta-Sánchez A, Sagristà-Sauleda J, Ferreira-González I, Torrents-Fernández A, Roca-Luque I, García-Dorado D. Constrictive pericarditis: etiologic spectrum, patterns of clinical presentation, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed). 2015;68(12):1092–100.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bertog SC, Thambidorai SK, Parakh K, Schoenhagen P, Ozduran V, Houghtaling PL, et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(8):1445–52.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kusunose K, Dahiya A, Popović ZB, Motoki H, Alraies MC, Zurick AO, et al. Biventricular mechanics in constrictive pericarditis comparison with restrictive cardiomyopathy and impact of pericardiectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(3):399–406.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Welch TD, Ling LH, Espinosa RE, Anavekar NS, Wiste HJ, Lahr BD, et al. Echocardiographic diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis: Mayo Clinic criteria. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(3):526–34.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ha JW, Oh JK, Ling LH, Nishimura RA, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Annulus paradoxus: transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio is inversely proportional to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Circulation. 2001;104(9):976–8.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Klein AL, Cohen GI, Pietrolungo JF, White RD, Bailey A, Pearce GL, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of respiratory variations in pulmonary venous flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(7):1935–43.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    von Bibra H, Schober K, Jenni R, Busch R, Sebening H, Blomer H. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the hepatic vein. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63(7):483–8.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sengupta PP, Krishnamoorthy VK, Abhayaratna WP, Korinek J, Belohlavek M, Sundt TM 3rd, et al. Disparate patterns of left ventricular mechanics differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(1):29–38.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Veress G, Ling LH, Kim KH, Dal-Bianco JP, Schaff HV, Espinosa RE, et al. Mitral and tricuspid annular velocities before and after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(4):399–407.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Tajik AJ, Tazelaar HD, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1852–7.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Aljizeeri A, Sulaiman A, Alhulaimi N, Alsaileek A, Al-Mallah MH. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in heart failure: where the alphabet begins! Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(4):385–99.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rienmuller R, Groll R, Lipton MJ. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiol Clin N Am. 2004;42(3):587–601.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Giorgi B, Mollet NRA, Dymarkowski S, Rademakers FE, Bogaert J. Clinically suspected constrictive pericarditis: MR imaging assessment of ventricular septal motion and configuration in patients and healthy subjects. Radiology. 2003;228(2):417–24.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M, Rademakers FE, Bogaert J. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(4):944–51.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Thavendiranathan P, Verhaert D, Walls MC, Bender JA, Rajagopalan S, Chung YC, et al. Simultaneous right and left heart real-time, free-breathing CMR flow quantification identifies constrictive physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):15–24.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kumar A, Sato K, Yzeiraj E, Betancor J, Lin L, Tamarappoo BK, et al. Quantitative pericardial delayed hyperenhancement informs clinical course in recurrent pericarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(11):1337–46.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Reinmuller R, Gurgan M, Erdmann E, Kemkes BM, Kreutzer E, Weinhold C. CT and MR evaluation of pericardial constriction: a new diagnostic and therapeutic concept. J Thorac Imaging. 1993;8(2):108–21.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Sagrista-Sauleda J, Angel J, Sanchez A, Permanyer-Miralda G, Soler-Soler J. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(5):469–75.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, Martinez M, Syed IS, Araoz P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;124(17):1830–7.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Klein AL, Cremer PC. Ephemeral effusive constrictive pathophysiology. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2018;11(4. United States):542–5.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    •• Kim KH, Miranda WR, Sinak LJ, Syed FF, Melduni RM, Espinosa RE, et al. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis after pericardiocentesis: incidence, associated findings, and natural history. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(4):534–41 Insights into effusive constrictive pericardiris from one of the largest series of patients.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xu B, Harb SC, Klein AL. Utility of multimodality cardiac imaging in disorders of the pericardium. Echo Res Pract. 2018;5(2):R37–48.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gentry J, Klein AL, Jellis CL. Transient constrictive pericarditis: current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18(5):41.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    •• Chang S-A, et al. [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT predicts response to steroid therapy in constrictive pericarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(6):750–2 United States. Early experience with the use of PET/CT and response to therapy in patients with constrictive pericarditis.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Godar M, Liu J, Zhang P, Xia Y, Yuan Q. Primary pericardial mesothelioma: a rare entity. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2013;2013:283601.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sripariwuth A, Xu B, Shih-lin HS, Berry RS, Murthy S, Pettersson G, et al. Multimodality cardiac imaging assessment of a large metastatic pericardial leiomyosarcoma. CASE. 2018;2:156–62.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Klatt EC, Heitz DR. Cardiac metastases. Cancer. 1990;65(6):1456–9.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, Bergler-Klein J, Bogaert J, Davin L, et al. Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(8):721–40.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Funari M, Fujita N, Peck WW, Higgins CB. Cardiac tumors: assessment with Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15(6):953–8.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Patel J, Park C, Michaels J, Rosen S, Kort S. Pericardial cyst: case reports and a literature review. Echocardiography. 2004;21(3):269–72.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Demos TC, Budorick NE, Posniak HV. Benign mediastinal cysts: pointed appearance on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1989;13(1):132–3.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bogaert J, Francone M. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:14.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Garnier F, Eicher JC, Philip JL, Lalande A, Bieber H, Voute MF, et al. Congenital complete absence of the left pericardium: a rare cause of chest pain or pseudo-right heart overload. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33(2):E52–7.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Connolly HM, Click RL, Schattenberg TT, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Congenital absence of the pericardium: echocardiography as a diagnostic tool. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995;8(1):87–92.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Xu B, Betancor J, Asher C, Rosario A, Klein A. Congenital absence of the pericardium: a systematic approach to diagnosis and management. Cardiology. 2017;136(4):270–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Chetrit
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bo Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Beni R. Verma
    • 1
    • 2
  • Allan L. Klein
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Heart and Vascular Institute, Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pericardial DiseaseCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Pericardial Disease Center, Department of Cardiovascular MedicineCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations