Advertisement

Advances in Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapies for NSTE-ACS

  • Anish BadjatiyaEmail author
  • Sunil V. Rao
Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes (H Jneid, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes

Abstract

The treatment of patients requiring anticoagulation who develop acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or require percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) must balance the reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, stroke, and major bleeding. The development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation has ushered in an era of potential treatment options for these complex patients.

Purpose of Review

To review the clinical evidence underlying the use of DOACs for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS or PCI.

Recent Findings

Three trials studied this particular patient population; WOEST showed that dual therapy with warfarin and clopidogrel decreased hemorrhage at 1 year compared with standard triple therapy (19.4 vs. 44.4% HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.26–0.50; P < 0.0001), without increasing thromboembolic events (11.1 vs. 17.6% HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.38–0.94; P = 0.025). PIONEER AF-PCI showed that 10–15 mg rivaroxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months significantly lowered bleeding rates than standard triple therapy (16.8 vs. 26.7% HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.47–0.76; P < 0.001) and had equivalent rates of MACE. Finally, REDUAL-PCI compared two different doses of dabigatran (110 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily) plus P2Y12 inhibitor with standard triple therapy and reported reduced ISTH bleeding with both doses; HR 0.52 with 110 mg dabigatran (95% CI 0.42–0.63, P < 0.001) and HR 0.72 with 150 mg dabigatran (95% CI 0.58–0.88; P = 0.002). The rate of the composite of thromboembolic events, death, or unplanned revascularizations was similar between pooled dabigatran dual therapy and triple therapy groups (13.7 vs 13.4% HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.84–1.29; P = 0.005).

Summary

Recent evidence shows that DOACs plus one antiplatelet agent can decrease bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI for ACS. Although not powered to detect non-inferiority or superiority, large studies suggest rivaroxaban 10–15 mg plus P2Y12 inhibitor for 12 months or dabigatran 150 mg twice daily plus P2y12 inhibitor for 12 months will have similar rates of MACE and stent thrombosis as triple therapy. In patients who have contraindications to DOACs, the strategy of INR-adjusted warfarin plus clopidogrel appears to be safer than warfarin plus dual antiplatelet therapy.

Keywords

Antiplatelet therapy Anticoagulation Atrial fibrillation Acute coronary syndrome Bleeding 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Anish Badjatiya and Sunil V. Rao declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Callaway CW, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, et al. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018;137(12):e67–e492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28–e292.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gurbel PA, Tantry US. Antithrombotic therapy in medically managed patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Heart. 2016;102(11):882–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152(5):1243–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahaffey KW, Wojdyla DM, Carroll K, Becker RC, Storey RF, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel by geographic region in the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation. 2011;124(5):544–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rothwell PM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Price JF, Belch JFF, Roncaglioni MC, et al. Effects of aspirin on risks of vascular events and cancer according to bodyweight and dose: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2018;392(10145):387–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savi P, Nurden P, Nurden AT, Levy-Toledano S, Herbert JM. Clopidogrel: a review of its mechanism of action. Platelets. 1998;9(3–4):251–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox KA, Mehta SR, Peters R, Zhao F, Lakkis N, Gersh BJ, et al. Benefits and risks of the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin in patients undergoing surgical revascularization for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: the clopidogrel in unstable angina to prevent recurrent ischemic events (CURE) trial. Circulation. 2004;110(10):1202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(20):2001–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roe MT, Armstrong PW, Fox KA, White HD, Prabhakaran D, Goodman SG, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(14):1297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wiviott SD, Antman EM, Gibson CM, Montalescot G, Riesmeyer J, Weerakkody G, et al. Evaluation of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: design and rationale for the TRial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 38 (TRITON-TIMI 38). Am Heart J. 2006;152(4):627–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(11):1045–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dewilde WJ, Oirbans T, Verheugt FW, Kelder JC, De Smet BJ, Herrman JP, et al. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9872):1107–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    January CT, Wann LS, Alpert JS, Calkins H, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. 2014;130(23):2071–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hess CN, Peterson ED, Peng SA, De Lemos JA, Fosbol EL, Thomas L, et al. Use and outcomes of triple therapy among older patients with acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(6):616–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kubitza D, Becka M, Mueck W, Halabi A, Maatouk H, Klause N, et al. Effects of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(5):703–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(10):883–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sherwood MW, Cyr DD, Jones WS, Becker RC, Berkowitz SD, Washam JB, et al. Use of dual antiplatelet therapy and patient outcomes in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the ROCKET AF trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(16):1694–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Bassand JP, Bhatt DL, Bode C, et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(1):9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    • Gibson CM, Mehran R, Bode C, Halperin J, Verheugt FW, Wildgoose P, et al. Prevention of bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(25):2423–34 This was an important trial that studied triple therapy, and had two different dosages tested. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stahle H, Gansser D, Roth W. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(3):292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(12):1139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oldgren J, Budaj A, Granger CB, Khder Y, Roberts J, Siegbahn A, et al. Dabigatran vs. placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes on dual antiplatelet therapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase II trial. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(22):2781–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Cannon CP, Bhatt DL, Oldgren J, Lip GYH, Ellis SG, Kimura T, et al. Dual antithrombotic therapy with dabigatran after PCI in atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(16):1513–24 This was an important well designed trial that studied triple therapy. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eliquis. Eliquis Highlights of Prescribing Informatoin 2018 [Eliquis package insert ]. Available from: https://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_eliquis.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2018.
  27. 27.
    Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):981–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S, Kilaru R, He Y, Mohan P, et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(8):699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoshi T, Sato A, Nogami A, Gosho M, Aonuma K. Rationale and design of the SAFE-A study: SAFety and effectiveness trial of Apixaban use in association with dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Cardiol. 2017;69(4):648–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lopes RD, Vora AN, Liaw D, Granger CB, Darius H, Goodman SG, et al. An open-label, 2 x 2 factorial, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonist and aspirin vs. placebo in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome and/or percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the AUGUSTUS trial. Am Heart J. 2018;200:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    • Chiarito M, Cao D, Cannata F, Godino C, Lodigiani C, Ferrante G, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in addition to antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(3):234–41 This is the only meta-analysis that stratified studies based off of type of ACS, and actually found a difference. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineDuke University Health SystemDurhamUSA
  2. 2.The Duke Clinical Research InstituteDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations